World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
8076
World Ranking
7034
National Ranking
2513

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
7131
World Ranking
7634
National Ranking
2099

Mitchell J. Small publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell J. Small sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 253 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mitchell J. Small D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell J. Small sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mitchell J. Small is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering, with a focus on Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection

Mitchell J. Small has contributed to several academic journals, frequently publishing in:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Applied Geochemistry
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Applied Energy

Their recent papers include:

  • Global knowledge base for municipal solid waste management: Framework development and application in waste generation prediction, 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Forecast of the U.S. Copper Demand: a Framework Based on Scenario Analysis and Stock Dynamics, 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Impacts of projected climate change scenarios on heating and cooling demand for industrial broiler chicken farming in the Eastern U.S, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Applying risk tolerance and socio-technical dynamics for more realistic energy transition pathways, 2021, Applied Energy
  • Utilization of produced water baseline as a groundwater monitoring tool at a CO2-EOR site in the Permian Basin, Texas, USA, 2020, Applied Geochemistry

Frequent coauthors of Mitchell J. Small are:

  • Gabrielle Wong-Parodi
  • James Gardiner
  • Randall Thomas
  • Jiaan Wang
  • Christina Lopano

Best Publications

  • The battle of the water sensor networks (BWSN): A design challenge for engineers and algorithms

    Avi Ostfeld;James G. Uber;Elad Salomons;Jonathan W. Berry

  • Sustainability Science and Engineering: The Emergence of a New Metadiscipline

    James R. Mihelcic;John C. Crittenden;Mitchell J. Small;David R. Shonnard

  • U.S. DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale

    Angela Goodman;Alexandra Hakala;Grant Bromhal;Dawn Deel

  • Risks and risk governance in unconventional shale gas development.

    Mitchell J. Small;Paul C. Stern;Elizabeth Bomberg;Susan M. Christopherson

  • Extending the Boundaries of Life‐Cycle Assessment through Environmental Economic Input‐Output Models

    H. Scott Matthews;Mitchell J. Small

  • Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption?

    Shahzeen Z. Attari;Mary Schoen;Cliff I. Davidson;Michael L. DeKay

  • Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Decision Making

    Granger Morgan;Hadi Dowlatabadi

  • Integrated Environmental Modeling: Pollutant Transport, Fate, and Risk in the Environment

    Anu Ramaswami;Jana B. Milford;Mitchell J. Small

  • Correlation of the physicochemical properties of natural organic matter samples from different sources to their effects on gold nanoparticle aggregation in monovalent electrolyte.

    Stacey M. Louie;Eleanor R. Spielman-Sun;Mitchell J. Small;Robert D. Tilton

  • Managing China’s coal power plants to address multiple environmental objectives

    Wei Peng;Wei Peng;Wei Peng;Fabian Wagner;Fabian Wagner;M. V. Ramana;M. V. Ramana;Haibo Zhai

  • Risk‐Based Environmental Remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo Analysis and the Expected Value of Sample Information

    Maxine E. Dakins;John E. Toll;Mitchell J. Small;Kevin P. Brand

  • An environmental sensor network to determine drinking water quality and security

    Anastassia Ailamaki;Christos Faloutos;Paul S. Fischbeck;Mitchell J. Small

  • What information belongs in a warning

    Baruch Fischhoff;Donna Riley;Daniel C. Kovacs;Mitchell Small

  • Designing cost-effective seawater reverse osmosis system under optimal energy options

    Asmerom M. Gilau;Mitchell J. Small

  • Updating Uncertainty in an Integrated Risk Assessment: Conceptual Framework and Methods

    Kevin P. Brand;Mitchell J. Small

  • Agent‐Based Modeling and Industrial Ecology

    Robert L. Axtell;Clinton J. Andrews;Mitchell J. Small

  • Quantifying the hurricane risk to offshore wind turbines

    Stephen Rose;Paulina Jaramillo;Mitchell J. Small;Iris Grossmann

  • Elicitation of expert judgments of uncertainty in the risk assessment of herbicide-tolerant oilseed crops.

    Martin P. Krayer von Krauss;Elizabeth A. Casman;Mitchell J. Small

  • Seasonal variations in sulfate, nitrate and chloride in the greenland ice sheet: Relation to atmospheric concentrations

    C.I. Davidson;J.R. Harrington;M.J. Stephenson;M.J. Small

  • Bayesian Environmental Policy Decisions: Two Case Studies

    Lara J. Wolfson;Joseph B. Kadane;Mitchell J. Small

  • Identifying Sets of Key Nodes for Placing Sensors in Dynamic Water Distribution Networks

    Jianhua Xu;Paul S. Fischbeck;Mitchell J. Small;Jeanne M. VanBriesen

  • Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field

    Timothy McDaniels;Mitchell J. Small

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Schervish
Mark J. Schervish Carnegie Mellon University
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Cliff I. Davidson
Cliff I. Davidson Syracuse University
Paulina Jaramillo
Paulina Jaramillo Carnegie Mellon University
David A. Dzombak
David A. Dzombak Carnegie Mellon University
Jay Apt
Jay Apt Carnegie Mellon University
Edward S. Rubin
Edward S. Rubin Carnegie Mellon University
Joseph B. Kadane
Joseph B. Kadane Carnegie Mellon University
Timothy L. McDaniels
Timothy L. McDaniels University of British Columbia
Fabian Wagner
Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students prioritize affordability, and finding the best affordable online general studies degree programs can be a great starting point. These programs often provide flexible options to build a foundation before specializing.

If you're looking for a streamlined path, some may consider pursuing the easiest degree to get that still complements environmental science careers. However, balancing ease with relevance ensures you gain the skills necessary for the job market.

Specialized degrees, such as an online geology degree, are closely aligned with environmental studies and can lead to roles in resource management, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Another promising area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Graduates with skills from the best GIS graduate programs are in high demand, as GIS expertise is critical for environmental mapping, planning, and data analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell J. Small

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles