World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy L. McDaniels

Timothy L. McDaniels

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4990 4629 299 287 96 8207

Timothy L. McDaniels publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy L. McDaniels between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy L. McDaniels published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2012. 1 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2012. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1987 2021

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy L. McDaniels: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 3
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 0
1994 2
1995 4
1996 5
1997 1
1998 5
1999 7
2000 2
2001 7
2002 2
2003 5
2004 1
2005 6
2006 5
2007 3
2008 4
2009 1
2010 4
2011 2
2012 9
2013 3
2014 3
2015 5
2016 1
2017 3
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Timothy L. McDaniels publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy L. McDaniels sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 96 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 96
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy L. McDaniels D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy L. McDaniels sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Timothy L. McDaniels is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their academic profile lacks published papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues listed in the available data.

There is no record of book publications associated with this researcher, nor are there specified fields or subfields of study or main research topics detailed.

No awards or honors are documented for Timothy L. McDaniels in the provided information.

The academic focus and detailed contributions of Timothy L. McDaniels remain unspecified based on the current data set.

Best Publications

  • Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices

    R. Gregory;L. Failing;M. Harstone;G. Long

  • Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation

    Timothy McDaniels;Stephanie Chang;Darren Cole;Joseph Mikawoz

  • Democratizing Risk Management: Successful Public Involvement in Local Water Management Decisions

    Timothy L. McDaniels;Robin S. Gregory;Daryl Fields

  • Characterizing Perception of Ecological Risk

    Timothy McDaniels;Lawrence J. Axelrod;Paul Slovic

  • Perception of ecological risk to water environments

    T.L. McDaniels;L.J. Axelrod;N.S. Cavanagh;P. Slovic

  • Toward disaster-resilient cities: characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments.

    Stephanie E. Chang;Timothy McDaniels;Jana Fox;Rajan Dhariwal

  • Infrastructure failure interdependencies in extreme events: power outage consequences in the 1998 Ice Storm

    Stephanie E. Chang;Timothy L. McDaniels;Joey Mikawoz;Æ Krista Peterson

  • Empirical Framework for Characterizing Infrastructure Failure Interdependencies

    Timothy McDaniels;Stephanie Chang;Krista Peterson;Joey Mikawoz

  • Testing a Structured Decision Approach: Value‐Focused Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication

    Joseph L. Arvai;Robin Gregory;Timothy L. McDaniels

  • Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions

    Robin Gregory;Tim McDaniels;Daryl Fields

  • Risk perception and the value of safety.

    Timothy L. McDaniels;Mark S. Kamlet;Gregory W. Fischer

  • The ecological footprint: a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America

    Maged Senbel;Timothy McDaniels;Hadi Dowlatabadi

  • Value-Focused Thinking about Strategic Decisions at BC Hydro

    Ralph L. Keeney;Timothy L. McDaniels

  • Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: Factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica

    Raffaele Vignola;Thomas Koellner;Thomas Koellner;Roland W. Scholz;Tim L. McDaniels

  • Expert views on biodiversity conservation in an era of climate change

    Shannon Hagerman;Hadi Dowlatabadi;Hadi Dowlatabadi;Terre Satterfield;Tim McDaniels

  • Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: Using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas

    Raffaele Vignola;Raffaele Vignola;Timothy L. McDaniels;Roland W. Scholz

  • Perceived ecological risks of global change: A psychometric comparison of causes and consequences☆

    Timothy McDaniels;Lawrence J Axelrod;Paul Slovic

  • Acceptable Input: Using Decision Analysis to Guide Public Policy Deliberations

    Robin Gregory;Baruch Fischhoff;Tim McDaniels

  • Learning as an Objective within a Structured Risk Management Decision Process

    Timothy L. Mcdaniels;Robin Gregory

  • Identifying and Structuring Values to Guide Integrated Resource Planning at Bc Gas

    Ralph L. Keeney;Timothy L. McDaniels

  • Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field

    Timothy McDaniels;Mitchell J. Small

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin Gregory
Robin Gregory University of British Columbia
Paul Slovic
Paul Slovic University of Oregon
Ralph L. Keeney
Ralph L. Keeney Duke University
Bruno Locatelli
Bruno Locatelli Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
Kai M. A. Chan
Kai M. A. Chan University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Social Sciences and Humanities education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with a growing emphasis on flexible online learning. Students interested in meaningful careers can now access a range of specialized degree programs tailored to busy schedules and diverse career goals.

For those seeking to make a difference in social work, online accelerated msw programs offer a fast-track route to a Master of Social Work and open doors to vital roles in community organizations or clinical settings. If psychology is your passion, a fast psychology degree enables you to build foundational knowledge and launch into careers or further graduate studies in less time.

Students focused on counseling can benefit from cacrep online counseling programs, which provide high-quality, accredited preparation for licensure and professional practice. Meanwhile, those aiming to work in therapy with couples and families will find online marriage and family therapy graduate programs to be an accessible and affordable path toward a rewarding career.

These flexible online degree options make it easier than ever to pursue careers that empower, heal, and support others, all while accommodating your personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy L. McDaniels

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles