World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
51
Citations
16280
World Ranking
2520
National Ranking
137

Terre Satterfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terre Satterfield sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Terre Satterfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terre Satterfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terre Satterfield is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans several fields within environmental science and social sciences, with a strong interdisciplinary approach that integrates ecological, social, and policy dimensions.

Their work is primarily situated in the fields of Environmental Science and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to various subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, and Oceanography.

Key topics covered by their research include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Climate Change Communication and Perception, Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses, Climate Change and Geoengineering, Environmental Education and Sustainability, and Risk Perception and Management.

Terre Satterfield has authored notable papers such as:

  • Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability (2020, People and Nature)
  • The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation? (2020, People and Nature)
  • Sociotechnical Considerations About Ocean Carbon Dioxide Removal (2022, Annual Review of Marine Science)
  • Why People Do What They Do: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Human Action Theories (2022, Annual Review of Environment and Resources)
  • Public evaluations of four approaches to ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (2023, Climate Policy)

Their frequent coauthors include Kai M. A. Chan, Sara Nawaz, Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent, Milind Kandlikar, and Robin Gregory.

Terre Satterfield has published extensively in several venues, with the majority of their work appearing in People and Nature. Other frequent publication venues include Conservation Biology, Environment and Planning E Nature and Space, SSRN Electronic Journal, and State of the Planet.

Best Publications

  • Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values

    Kai M.A. Chan;Terre Satterfield;Joshua Goldstein

  • Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

    Kai M. A. Chan;Patricia Balvanera;Karina Benessaiah;Mollie Chapman

  • Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect

    Melissa L. Finucane;Paul Slovic;C.K. Mertz;James Flynn

  • Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement

    Kai M. A. Chan;Anne D. Guerry;Patricia Balvanera;Sarah Klain

  • A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations

    Natalie C. Ban;Morena Mills;Morena Mills;Jordan Tam;Christina C. Hicks

  • Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis

    Nathan J. Bennett;Nathan J. Bennett;Terre Satterfield

  • The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment

    Debra Satz;Rachelle K. Gould;Kai M. A. Chan;Anne Guerry

  • Culture, Intangibles and Metrics in Environmental Management

    Terre Satterfield;Robin Gregory;Sarah C. Klain;Mere Roberts

  • From Invisibility to Transparency: Identifying the Implications

    Nancy J. Turner;Robin Gregory;Cheryl Brooks;Lee Failing

  • Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk.

    Terre A. Satterfield;C. K. Mertz;Paul Slovic

  • Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm.

    Sarah C. Klain;Paige Olmsted;Kai M. A. Chan;Terre Satterfield

  • Cultural services and non-use values

    Kai M. A. Chan;Joshua Goldstein;Terre Satterfield;Neil Hannahs

  • Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies

    Terre Satterfield;Milind Kandlikar;Christian E. H. Beaudrie;Joseph Conti

  • Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability

    Kai M. A. Chan;David R. Boyd;Rachelle K. Gould;Jens Jetzkowitz

  • A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame

    Rachelle K. Gould;Sarah C. Klain;Nicole M. Ardoin;Terre Satterfield

  • Engage key social concepts for sustainability

    Christina C. Hicks;Christina C. Hicks;Christina C. Hicks;Arielle Levine;Arun Agrawal;Xavier Basurto

  • Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management

    Sara Jo Breslow;Brit Sojka;Raz Barnea;Xavier Basurto

  • What Matters and Why? Ecosystem Services and Their Bundled Qualities

    Sarah C. Klain;Terre A. Satterfield;Kai M.A. Chan

  • Whakapapa as a Maori Mental Construct: Some Implications for the Debate over Genetic Modification of Organisms

    Mere Roberts;Bradford Haami;Richard Anthony Benton;Terre Satterfield

  • When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?

    Mollie Chapman;Terre A. Satterfield;Kai M. A. Chan

  • Expert views on biodiversity conservation in an era of climate change

    Shannon Hagerman;Hadi Dowlatabadi;Hadi Dowlatabadi;Terre Satterfield;Tim McDaniels

Frequent Co-Authors

Kai M. A. Chan
Kai M. A. Chan University of British Columbia
Christina C. Hicks
Christina C. Hicks Lancaster University
Robin Gregory
Robin Gregory University of British Columbia
Nathan J. Bennett
Nathan J. Bennett University of British Columbia
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern University of California, Santa Barbara
Xavier Basurto
Xavier Basurto Duke University
Michael B. Mascia
Michael B. Mascia Duke University
Phillip S. Levin
Phillip S. Levin University of Washington
Bryan G. Norton
Bryan G. Norton Georgia Institute of Technology
Nicholas Frank Pidgeon
Nicholas Frank Pidgeon Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens various career pathways for students. Popular options include social work, counseling, and psychology—all critical fields that offer both personal fulfillment and strong job prospects.

An online Master of Social Work is a popular path, with many students searching for most affordable online msw programs to minimize costs. Those seeking faster credentialing may consider accelerated msw programs online that allow graduates to enter the workforce sooner.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, bcba certification can lead to specialized roles supporting individuals with behavioral challenges. Additionally, students can gain foundational knowledge through an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online, which prepares graduates for entry-level careers or advanced study.

Regardless of your chosen path, online programs offer flexible learning and can lead to impactful careers serving individuals, families, and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Terre Satterfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles