World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 45 5389 5193 1509 1397 128 9751
Environmental Sciences 45 6307 6055 2276 2111 134 9870

Paulina Jaramillo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paulina Jaramillo between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paulina Jaramillo published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 8 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 3 publications
2005 2026

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paulina Jaramillo: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 2
2008 2
2009 7
2010 3
2011 10
2012 9
2013 10
2014 10
2015 15
2016 9
2017 12
2018 10
2019 8
2020 12
2021 10
2022 10
2023 10
2024 3
2025 5
2026 3
Total 161
Download as CSV

Paulina Jaramillo publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulina Jaramillo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386 128
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Paulina Jaramillo D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulina Jaramillo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341 45
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow

Overview

Paulina Jaramillo is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science, with an emphasis on the intersections of climate change, energy systems, and sustainability.

Their research spans several specific topics, including:

  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Key subfields of study for Jaramillo include:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Pollution

Frequent publication venues where their work has appeared are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
  • Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability
  • Nature Communications

Among recent papers by Paulina Jaramillo are the following:

  • "Effects of Climate Change on Capacity Expansion Decisions of an Electricity Generation Fleet in the Southeast U.S.", 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Hydropower under climate uncertainty: Characterizing the usable capacity of Brazilian, Colombian and Peruvian power plants under climate scenarios", 2021, Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
  • "Impacts of projected climate change scenarios on heating and cooling demand for industrial broiler chicken farming in the Eastern U.S", 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Air pollution emission effects of changes in transport supply: the case of Bogotá, Colombia", 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • "Leveraging Open-Source Tools for Collaborative Macro-energy System Modeling Efforts", 2020, Joule

Jaramillo collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Katherine Jordan
  • Nicholas Z. Muller
  • P. J. Adams
  • Bart Nijssen
  • Nathaniel J. Williams

In 2020, Paulina Jaramillo was awarded the Andrew Carnegie Fellow distinction.

Best Publications

  • Net-Zero Emissions Energy Systems

    Steven J Davis;Nathan S. Lewis;Matthew Shaner;Sonia Aggarwal

  • A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies

    Edward S. Rubin;Inês M.L. Azevedo;Paulina Jaramillo;Sonia Yeh

  • Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.

    Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas

    Mohan Jiang;W Michael Griffin;Chris Hendrickson;Paulina Jaramillo

  • Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar

    Christopher T. M. Clack;Christopher T. M. Clack;Staffan A. Qvist;Jay Apt;Morgan Bazilian

  • Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Mikhail Chester;Paulina Jaramillo;Constantine Samaras

  • Enabling private sector investment in microgrid-based rural electrification in developing countries: A review

    Nathaniel J. Williams;Paulina Jaramillo;Jay Taneja;Taha Selim Ustun

  • Life Cycle Assessment and Grid Electricity: What Do We Know and What Can We Know?

    Christopher L. Weber;Paulina Jaramillo;Joe Marriott;Constantine Samaras

  • Life Cycle Inventory of CO2 in an Enhanced Oil Recovery System

    Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;Sean T. McCoy

  • Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.

    Aranya Venkatesh;Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Internet of Things: Energy boon or bane?

    Eric Hittinger;Paulina Jaramillo

  • Landfill-gas-to-energy projects: analysis of net private and social benefits.

    Paulina Jaramillo;H. Scott Matthews

  • Air pollution emissions and damages from energy production in the U.S.: 2002–2011

    Paulina Jaramillo;Nicholas Z. Muller

  • Greenhouse gas mitigation for U.S. plastics production: energy first, feedstocks later

    I Daniel Posen;Paulina Jaramillo;Amy E Landis;W Michael Griffin

  • Estimating the potential of controlled plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging to reduce operational and capacity expansion costs for electric power systems with high wind penetration

    Allison Weis;Paulina Jaramillo;Jeremy Michalek

  • Greenhouse gas implications of using coal for transportation: Life cycle assessment of coal-to-liquids, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen pathways

    Paulina Jaramillo;Constantine Samaras;Heather Wakeley;Kyle W Meisterling

  • Comparison of Life Cycle Greenhouse Gases from Natural Gas Pathways for Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles

    Fan Tong;Paulina Jaramillo;Inês M. L. Azevedo

  • Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from future Amazonian hydroelectric reservoirs

    Felipe A M de Faria;Paulina Jaramillo;Henrique O Sawakuchi;Jeffrey E Richey

  • Uncertainty analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum-based fuels and impacts on low carbon fuel policies.

    Aranya Venkatesh;Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Comparative Analysis of the Production Costs and Life-Cycle GHG Emissions of FT Liquid Fuels from Coal and Natural Gas

    Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Life cycle comparison of traditional retail and e-commerce logistics for electronic products: A case study of buy.com

    Christopher L. Weber;Chris T. Hendrickson;H. Scott Matthews;Amy Nagengast

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Michael Griffin
W. Michael Griffin Carnegie Mellon University
H. Scott Matthews
H. Scott Matthews Carnegie Mellon University
Jay Apt
Jay Apt Carnegie Mellon University
Inês L. Azevedo
Inês L. Azevedo Stanford University
Bri-Mathias Hodge
Bri-Mathias Hodge University of Colorado Boulder
Chris Hendrickson
Chris Hendrickson Carnegie Mellon University
Mitchell J. Small
Mitchell J. Small Carnegie Mellon University
Jeremy J. Michalek
Jeremy J. Michalek Carnegie Mellon University
Bart Nijssen
Bart Nijssen University of Washington
Steven J. Davis
Steven J. Davis Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible education options in Engineering and Technology has surged, giving rise to a variety of online degree pathways. Many students now opt for college classes online, which provide accessible and efficient routes to gain essential skills and credentials. This flexibility is especially useful for those who need to balance education with work or family responsibilities.

For those seeking to accelerate their careers, accelerated online finance degree programs and fastest mba programs offer intensive coursework tailored for rapid completion. Such programs often integrate technology-driven modules, making them relevant to engineering professionals interested in expanding business or finance expertise.

Diverse career pathways also exist outside traditional engineering fields. For example, online paralegal programs can equip graduates with the legal knowledge needed in technical industries, emphasizing the cross-disciplinary value of online education. Exploring these related online degrees can open new career possibilities and support ongoing professional development in technology-driven sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Paulina Jaramillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles