World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
6928
World Ranking
7964
National Ranking
2189

Jeremy J. Michalek publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy J. Michalek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 109 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jeremy J. Michalek D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy J. Michalek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy J. Michalek is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within engineering, with a strong emphasis on electric vehicles, transportation, and energy systems.

Their work covers several main fields of study, including:

  • Engineering

Within this broad field, their subfields of expertise include:

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Transportation
  • Building and Construction

Jeremy J. Michalek's research topics highlight a focus on technologies and policies related to transportation and energy:

  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Smart Grid Energy Management

The scientist has recently contributed to publications in several peer-reviewed journals, including the following representative papers:

  • "Electric vehicle battery chemistry affects supply chain disruption vulnerabilities," 2024, Nature Communications
  • "Utility-Scale Portable Energy Storage Systems," 2020, Joule
  • "Technology advancement is driving electric vehicle adoption," 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Air Pollution, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic Externality Benefits and Costs of Shifting Private Vehicle Travel to Ridesourcing Services," 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "The impact of Uber and Lyft on vehicle ownership, fuel economy, and transit across U.S. cities," 2021, iScience

Frequent venues for their research publication include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
  • Journal of Mechanical Design

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work, with frequent coauthors comprising:

  • Kate S. Whitefoot
  • Connor Forsythe
  • Destenie Nock
  • Corey D. Harper
  • Matthew Bruchon

Best Publications

  • Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China

    John Paul Helveston;Yimin Liu;Elea McDonnell Feit;Erica Fuchs

  • Effects of Regional Temperature on Electric Vehicle Efficiency, Range, and Emissions in the United States

    Tugce Yuksel;Jeremy J. Michalek

  • Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Fred M. Feinberg;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles

    Ching-Shin Norman Shiau;Constantine Samaras;Richard Hauffe;Jeremy J. Michalek

  • Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Mikhail Chester;Paulina Jaramillo;Constantine Samaras

  • Architectural layout design optimization

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Ruchi Choudhary;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Influence of driving patterns on life cycle cost and emissions of hybrid and plug-in electric vehicle powertrains

    Orkun Karabasoglu;Jeremy Michalek

  • Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO2 Emissions across the United States

    Mili-Ann M. Tamayao;Jeremy J. Michalek;Chris Hendrickson;Inês M. L. Azevedo

  • A techno-economic analysis and optimization of Li-ion batteries for light-duty passenger vehicle electrification

    Apurba Sakti;Jeremy J. Michalek;Erica R.H. Fuchs;Jay F. Whitacre

  • Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Oben Ceryan;Panos Y. Papalambros;Yoram Koren

  • A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Panos Y. Papalambros;Steven J. Skerlos

  • Cost-effectiveness of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle battery capacity and charging infrastructure investment for reducing US gasoline consumption

    Scott B. Peterson;Jeremy J. Michalek

  • Optimal Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Design and Allocation for Minimum Life Cycle Cost, Petroleum Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    Ching-Shin Norman Shiau;Nikhil Kaushal;Chris T. Hendrickson;Scott B. Peterson

  • Effect of regional grid mix, driving patterns and climate on the comparative carbon footprint of gasoline and plug-in electric vehicles in the United States

    Tugce Yuksel;Mili-Ann M Tamayao;Chris Hendrickson;Inês M L Azevedo

  • Enhancing marketing with engineering: Optimal product line design for heterogeneous markets☆

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Peter Ebbes;Feray Adigüzel;Fred M. Feinberg

  • Estimating the potential of controlled plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging to reduce operational and capacity expansion costs for electric power systems with high wind penetration

    Allison Weis;Paulina Jaramillo;Jeremy Michalek

  • Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle LiFePO4 battery life implications of thermal management, driving conditions, and regional climate

    Tugce Yuksel;Shawn Litster;Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan;Jeremy J. Michalek

  • Labeling energy cost on light bulbs lowers implicit discount rates

    Jihoon Min;Inês L. Azevedo;Jeremy Michalek;Wändi Bruine de Bruin;Wändi Bruine de Bruin

  • A structural analysis of vehicle design responses to Corporate Average Fuel Economy policy

    Ching-Shin Norman Shiau;Jeremy J. Michalek;Chris T. Hendrickson

  • AN EFFICIENT WEIGHTING UPDATE METHOD TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTABLE CONSISTENCY DEVIATION IN ANALYTICAL TARGET CASCADING

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Panos Y. Papalambros

Frequent Co-Authors

Inês L. Azevedo
Inês L. Azevedo Stanford University
Panos Y. Papalambros
Panos Y. Papalambros University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jay Whitacre
Jay Whitacre Carnegie Mellon University
Chris Hendrickson
Chris Hendrickson Carnegie Mellon University
Paulina Jaramillo
Paulina Jaramillo Carnegie Mellon University
Jonathan Cagan
Jonathan Cagan Carnegie Mellon University
Kevin G. Gallagher
Kevin G. Gallagher Argonne National Laboratory
Timothy W. Simpson
Timothy W. Simpson Pennsylvania State University
Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Wändi Bruine de Bruin University of Southern California
Soummya Kar
Soummya Kar Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can help you find flexible, affordable pathways in Engineering and Technology fields. For those focused on cost, the cheapest online master's in urban planning options make it possible to gain expertise without major financial stress. These programs are particularly valuable for students who want to impact communities through sustainable design and planning.

If speed is your priority, choosing a 6 month masters degree can help you fast-track your career advancement. Completing a master’s in such a short period lets you quickly acquire new skills and credentials while balancing your current responsibilities.

Not all high-paying technology careers require a traditional degree. Many students are now pursuing jobs that only require a certificate. These certifications can open doors to roles in IT, engineering technology, and related sectors—often within just a few months of study.

Flexibility is also crucial for parents and working professionals. The best online degrees for moms allow learners to manage family commitments while gaining valuable qualifications for technology-focused career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy J. Michalek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles