World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 72 342 312 157 133 484 18591

Panos Y. Papalambros publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Panos Y. Papalambros between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Panos Y. Papalambros published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2010. 4 of the 510 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2010. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1979 2025

510 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Panos Y. Papalambros: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 1
1981 3
1982 4
1983 6
1984 7
1985 4
1986 2
1987 7
1988 4
1989 10
1990 5
1991 4
1992 5
1993 9
1994 9
1995 9
1996 9
1997 8
1998 4
1999 12
2000 17
2001 12
2002 23
2003 20
2004 19
2005 23
2006 23
2007 15
2008 24
2009 25
2010 35
2011 35
2012 17
2013 17
2014 11
2015 15
2016 12
2017 8
2018 4
2019 4
2020 6
2021 4
2022 9
2023 5
2024 1
2025 3
Total 510
Download as CSV

Panos Y. Papalambros publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Panos Y. Papalambros sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 477–486 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 484 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24 484
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Panos Y. Papalambros D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Panos Y. Papalambros sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19 72
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Panos Y. Papalambros is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to engineering and management, with a focus on design, technology innovation, and system optimization.

Their scholarly work covers several main fields of study, including:

  • Engineering
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these broader fields, their subfields of specialization include:

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Water Science and Technology

The central topics of their research include:

  • Design Education and Practice
  • Product Development and Customization
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Open Source Software Innovations

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research: 10 years later" (2022), published in International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
  • "Micro Water-Energy-Food (MicroWEF) Nexus: A system design optimization framework for Integrated Natural Resource Conservation and Development (INRCD) projects at community scale" (2023), published in Applied Energy
  • "CROWDSOURCING: A PRIMER AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING" (2024), published in SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • "UNDERSTANDING RESILIENCE OF AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW" (2023), published in Proceedings of the Design Society
  • "On the use of coordination strategies in complex engineered system design projects" (2020), published in Design Science

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Nökkvi S. Sigurdarson
  • Tobias Eifler
  • Emmanuel Wokulira Miyingo
  • Peter Ozaveshe Oviroh
  • Jesse Austin-Breneman

Papanlambros has contributed regularly to notable publication venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the Design Society
  • Journal of Mechanical Design
  • Design Science
  • Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference
  • International Journal of Vehicle Design

Best Publications

  • Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation

    Panos Y. Papalambros;Douglass J. Wilde

  • Target Cascading in Optimal System Design

    Hyung Min Kim;Nestor F. Michelena;Panos Y. Papalambros;Tao Jiang

  • Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Fred M. Feinberg;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • On the coupling between the plant and controller optimization problems

    H.K. Fathy;J.A. Reyer;P.Y. Papalambros;A.G. Ulsov

  • A NOTE ON WEIGHTED CRITERIA METHODS FOR COMPROMISE SOLUTIONS IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION

    Timothy Ward Athan;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Analytical Target Cascading in Automotive Vehicle Design

    Harrison Hyung Min Kim;D. Geoff Rideout;Panos Y. Papalambros;Jeffrey L. Stein

  • An augmented Lagrangian relaxation for analytical target cascading using the alternating direction method of multipliers

    S. Tosserams;L. F. P. Etman;P. Y. Papalambros;J. E. Rooda

  • Convergence properties of analytical target cascading

    Nestor Michelena;Hyungju Park;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Architectural layout design optimization

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Ruchi Choudhary;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • A Sequential Linearization Approach for Solving Mixed-Discrete Nonlinear Design Optimization Problems

    Han Tong Loh;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN PRODUCT PLATFORM DESIGN

    Sigurd A. Nelson;Matthew B. Parkinson;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Combined optimisation of design and power management of the hydraulic hybrid propulsion system for the 6 × 6 medium truck

    Z. Filipi;L. Louca;B. Daran;C-C Lin

  • A Survey of Structural Optimization in Mechanical Product Development

    Kazuhiro Saitou;Kazuhiro Izui;Shinji Nishiwaki;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Oben Ceryan;Panos Y. Papalambros;Yoram Koren

  • A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Panos Y. Papalambros;Steven J. Skerlos

  • A Hypergraph Framework for Optimal Model-Based Decomposition ofDesign Problems

    Nestor F. Michelena;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Design Optimization of Hierarchically Decomposed Multilevel Systems Under Uncertainty

    Michael Kokkolaras;Zissimos P. Mourelatos;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Target cascading in vehicle redesign: a class VI truck study

    Hyung Min Kim;Michael Kokkolaras;Loucas S. Louca;George J. Delagrammatikas

  • Enhancing marketing with engineering: Optimal product line design for heterogeneous markets☆

    Jeremy J. Michalek;Peter Ebbes;Feray Adigüzel;Fred M. Feinberg

  • Probabilistic Analytical Target Cascading: A Moment Matching Formulation for Multilevel Optimization Under Uncertainty

    Huibin Liu;Wei Chen;Michael Kokkolaras;Panos Y. Papalambros

  • Optimization approach to hybrid electric propulsion system design

    D. Assanis;G. Delagrammatikas;R. Fellini;Z. Filipi

  • Comparing time histories for validation of simulation models : Error measures and metrics

    H. Sarin;Michael Kokkolaras;G. Hulbert;Panos Papalambros

  • Preference Inconsistency in Multidisciplinary Design Decision Making

    Erin F. MacDonald;Richard Gonzalez;Panos Y. Papalambros

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Gonzalez
Richard Gonzalez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
A. Galip Ulsoy
A. Galip Ulsoy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dennis N. Assanis
Dennis N. Assanis University of Delaware
Jeremy J. Michalek
Jeremy J. Michalek Carnegie Mellon University
John L. Volakis
John L. Volakis Florida International University
Noboru Kikuchi
Noboru Kikuchi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Zoran Filipi
Zoran Filipi Clemson University
Jeffrey L. Stein
Jeffrey L. Stein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hosam K. Fathy
Hosam K. Fathy University of Maryland, College Park
Bogdan I. Epureanu
Bogdan I. Epureanu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new doors for students interested in expanding their career options beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For example, those seeking to enter healthcare fields may find value in studying online speech pathology degree tuition and program costs to plan their education effectively.

Veterans interested in transitioning to civilian careers might explore specialized options such as a speech pathology degree online for veterans. These programs often provide flexible schedules and tailored support to ease the shift from military to academic life.

Students aiming for accelerated pathways should consider programs like the 5-year speech pathology programs, which combine undergraduate and graduate studies efficiently, saving time and tuition costs.

Beyond engineering and speech pathology, unique career paths such as criminal profiling offer promising salaries and job outlooks. Understanding roles like those described in criminal profiler salary insights may inspire interdisciplinary career decisions that blend technical expertise with investigative skills.

Best Scientists Citing Panos Y. Papalambros

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles