World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 57 2650 2530 809 734 177 12020
Environmental Sciences 58 3260 3119 1262 1170 193 12636

Adam R. Brandt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam R. Brandt between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam R. Brandt published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2025. 45 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2025. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 27 publications
2006 2025

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam R. Brandt: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 1
2008 4
2009 2
2010 8
2011 7
2012 5
2013 12
2014 8
2015 26
2016 14
2017 21
2018 18
2019 11
2020 22
2021 19
2022 24
2023 23
2024 18
2025 27
Total 272
Download as CSV

Adam R. Brandt publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam R. Brandt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 177 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407 177
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam R. Brandt D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam R. Brandt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167 57
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam R. Brandt is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Engineering, Environmental Science, and Energy. The main areas of study focus on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Global and Planetary Change, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics within environmental and energy research. Key topics include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, Integrated Energy Systems Optimization, Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics, Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues, as well as Energy Load and Power Forecasting.

Adam R. Brandt has frequently published in several venues, with repeated contributions to Applied Energy, SSRN Electronic Journal, arXiv (Cornell University), Environmental Science & Technology, and Energy. These journals and platforms underscore their focus on energy systems and environmental impacts.

Coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Brandt include Evan David Sherwin, Yuhao Nie, Yuanlei Chen, Mohammad S. Masnadi, and Jeff Rutherford. These collaborations indicate a consistent engagement with researchers in related energy and environmental disciplines.

Recent publications by Adam R. Brandt illustrate the focus of their research efforts:

  • Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a Comprehensive Aerial Survey, 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Carbon intensity of global crude oil refining and mitigation potential, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Inefficient and unlit natural gas flares both emit large quantities of methane, 2022, Science
  • Concurrent variation in oil and gas methane emissions and oil price during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

These works involve detailed assessments of methane emissions, the environmental impacts of oil and natural gas operations, and broader energy sustainability challenges. Their research methodology incorporates emissions inventories, aerial surveys, and analyses of carbon intensity and gas flaring efficiency.

Adam R. Brandt's publications demonstrate an engagement with critical environmental issues related to fossil fuel production and its atmospheric impacts, with extensive citation records evidencing the research's influence across scientific communities.

Best Publications

  • Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain

    Ramón A. Alvarez;Daniel Zavala-Araiza;David R. Lyon;David T. Allen

  • Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems

    A. R. Brandt;G. A. Heath;E. A. Kort;F. O'Sullivan

  • Global oil depletion: A review of the evidence

    Steve Sorrell;Jamie Speirs;Roger Bentley;Adam Brandt

  • Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar

    Christopher T. M. Clack;Christopher T. M. Clack;Staffan A. Qvist;Jay Apt;Morgan Bazilian

  • Global carbon intensity of crude oil production

    Mohammad S. Masnadi;Hassan M. El-Houjeiri;Dominik Schunack;Yunpo Li

  • Methane Leaks from Natural Gas Systems Follow Extreme Distributions.

    Adam R. Brandt;Garvin A. Heath;Daniel Cooley

  • Converting oil shale to liquid fuels: energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions of the Shell in situ conversion process.

    Adam R. Brandt

  • The energetic implications of curtailing versus storing solar- and wind-generated electricity

    Charles J. Barnhart;Adam R. Brandt;Sally M. Benson

  • Clustering methods to find representative periods for the optimization of energy systems: An initial framework and comparison

    Holger Teichgraeber;Adam R. Brandt

  • Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions in the New Mexico Permian Basin with a Comprehensive Aerial Survey.

    Unknown

  • Closing the methane gap in US oil and natural gas production emissions inventories.

    Jeffrey S. Rutherford;Evan D. Sherwin;Arvind P. Ravikumar;Garvin A. Heath

  • Scraping the bottom of the barrel: greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources

    Adam R. Brandt;Alexander E. Farrell

  • Inefficient and unlit natural gas flares both emit large quantities of methane

    Unknown

  • Short-term solar power forecast with deep learning: Exploring optimal input and output configuration

    Yuchi Sun;Vignesh Venugopal;Adam R. Brandt

  • Aerial Surveys of Elevated Hydrocarbon Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Sites.

    David R. Lyon;David R. Lyon;Ramón A. Alvarez;Daniel Zavala-Araiza;Adam R. Brandt

  • Solar PV output prediction from video streams using convolutional neural networks

    Yuchi Sun;Gergely Szűcs;Adam R. Brandt

  • Risks of the oil transition

    A E Farrell;A R Brandt

  • Machine vision for natural gas methane emissions detection using an infrared camera

    Jingfan Wang;Lyne P. Tchapmi;Arvind P. Ravikumar;Mike McGuire

  • Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from oil and natural gas production in the Bakken shale region of North Dakota

    J. Peischl;J. Peischl;A. Karion;A. Karion;A. Karion;C. Sweeney;C. Sweeney;E. A. Kort

  • Carbon intensity of global crude oil refining and mitigation potential

    Liang Jing;Hassan M. El-Houjeiri;Jean-Christophe Monfort;Adam R. Brandt

  • Converting Oil Shale to Liquid Fuels with the Alberta Taciuk Processor: Energy Inputs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    Adam R. Brandt

  • Review of mathematical models of future oil supply: Historical overview and synthesizing critique

    Adam R. Brandt

  • Are Optical Gas Imaging Technologies Effective For Methane Leak Detection

    Arvind P. Ravikumar;Jingfan Wang;Adam R. Brandt

  • Global oil depletion - an assessment of the evidence for a near-term peak in global oil production

    Steven Sorrell;Jamie Speirs;Roger Bentley;Adam Brandt

  • Testing Hubbert

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A. Kort
Eric A. Kort University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Louis J. Durlofsky
Louis J. Durlofsky Stanford University
Garvin Heath
Garvin Heath National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Colm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Sally M. Benson
Sally M. Benson Stanford University
Jennifer Wilcox
Jennifer Wilcox University of Pennsylvania
Deborah M. Gordon
Deborah M. Gordon Stanford University
Anna Karion
Anna Karion National Institute of Standards and Technology
Robert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of rewarding online degree programs and career pathways. For those interested in the built environment and property markets, pursuing a real estate degree online can offer practical business knowledge and flexible learning options.

If you’re more focused on designing digital experiences, a ux design degree online equips you with creative and technical skills for high-demand tech roles. Project leadership is another key area; earning a project management degree salary can significantly boost your earnings as you manage teams and innovate across industries.

For those interested in emerging technologies, consider programs specializing in blockchain or fintech. Several institutions now offer comprehensive blockchain degree programs online, helping you prepare for the future of finance and secure digital transactions.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees provide the flexibility and career advancement opportunities essential for today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Adam R. Brandt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles