World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
59
Citations
58305
World Ranking
1497
National Ranking
713

Sarah Lichtenstein publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Lichtenstein sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 104 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Sarah Lichtenstein D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Lichtenstein sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah Lichtenstein was affiliated with the Oregon Research Institute in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the academic community primarily through research conducted under this institution.

There are no specific records available regarding their recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics. Likewise, no awards or honors are documented for Sarah Lichtenstein.

Given the absence of detailed publications or listed works, the full scope of Sarah Lichtenstein's academic focus remains unspecified.

Sarah Lichtenstein is recorded as deceased.

Best Publications

  • The psychometric study of risk perception

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH? A PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS AND BENEFITS

    Baruch Fischhoff;Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein;Stephen Read

  • Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff;Lawrence D. Phillips

  • Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment.

    Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff;Lawrence D. Phillips

  • Behavioral Decision Theory

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions.

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Paul Slovic

  • Judged frequency of lethal events

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Mark Layman

  • Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.

    Baruch Fischhoff;Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Reasons for confidence.

    Asher Koriat;Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Rating the Risks

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Do Those Who Know More Also Know More about How Much They Know

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Why Study Risk Perception

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation.

    Baruch Fischhoff;Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Preference reversals: A broader perspective

    Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas.

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Paul Slovic

  • Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking

    Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Judgment under uncertainty: Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • The Construction of Preference: Index

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Paul Slovic

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Slovic
Paul Slovic University of Oregon
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Robin Gregory
Robin Gregory University of British Columbia
Joseph B. Kadane
Joseph B. Kadane Carnegie Mellon University
Stephen J. Read
Stephen J. Read University of Southern California
William C. Clark
William C. Clark Harvard University
Robert L. Winkler
Robert L. Winkler Duke University
Thomas C. Brown
Thomas C. Brown US Forest Service
Ward Edwards
Ward Edwards University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities unlocks a range of online degree options and flexible pathways to advanced roles. Students interested in clinical psychology can consider the online psyd programs, which offer advanced training for future psychologists in a convenient, virtual format.

If you're passionate about marriage and family therapy, several lmft programs are now available online, making it easier to meet educational requirements while balancing other commitments. These programs open doors to counseling and community support professions.

Many students seek the flexibility and affordability of a masters in psychology online. Graduates can pursue roles in counseling, research, and organizational development, depending on their specialization.

For those aiming for leadership in education or policy, accelerated edd programs online provide a fast-track option. These programs are ideal for professionals looking to advance quickly without career interruption.

Each of these online degrees supports a variety of career paths and helps students achieve their professional goals in an accessible, modern learning environment.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah Lichtenstein