World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 109 407 256 175 361640

Amos Tversky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amos Tversky between 1964 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amos Tversky published across 56 years, from 1964 to 2019, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 1982. 2 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 1982. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 3 publications 1967: 5 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 3 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 11 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 23 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 15 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication
1964 2019

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amos Tversky: publications per year, 1964 to 2019
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 3
1967 5
1968 1
1969 3
1970 4
1971 11
1972 3
1973 2
1974 2
1975 1
1976 2
1977 6
1978 2
1979 6
1980 3
1981 6
1982 23
1983 10
1984 6
1985 3
1986 5
1987 4
1988 15
1989 9
1990 13
1991 7
1992 8
1993 8
1994 2
1995 5
1996 7
1997 4
1998 2
1999 0
2000 4
2001 0
2002 5
2003 5
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
Total 216
Download as CSV

Amos Tversky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos Tversky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amos Tversky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos Tversky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24 109
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Grawemeyer Award in Psychology, University of Louisville
  • 1989 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1985 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1984 - Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation
  • 1984 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1982 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association

Overview

Amos Tversky was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. The academic record available does not list specific papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work associated with this researcher.

The awards received by Amos Tversky reflect recognition across multiple esteemed organizations and foundations. These include:

  • APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association, 1982
  • Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation, 1984
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, 1984
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 1985
  • William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA), 1989
  • Grawemeyer Award in Psychology, University of Louisville, 2003

The timeline of awards spans over two decades, indicating an active and respected career in psychological science and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk

    Daniel Kahneman;Amos Tversky

  • Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

    A. Tversky;D. Kahneman

  • Choices, Values, and Frames

    Daniel Kahneman;Amos Tversky

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Amos Tversky;Daniel Kahneman

  • Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability

    Amos Tversky;Daniel Kahneman

  • Features of Similarity

    Amos Tversky

  • On the psychology of prediction

    Daniel Kahneman;Amos Tversky

  • Judgment under uncertainty: List of contributors

    Daniel Kahneman;Paul Slovic;Amos Tversky

  • Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution

    Daniel Kahneman;Paul Slovic;Amos Tversky

  • Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model

    Amos Tversky;Daniel Kahneman

  • Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness

    Daniel Kahneman;Amos Tversky

  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.

    Amos Tversky;Daniel Kahneman

  • Rational choice and the framing of decisions

    A. Tversky;D. Kahneman

  • Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

    Glenn R. Shafer;Daniel Kahnerman;Paul Slovic;Amos Tversky

  • Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice.

    Amos Tversky

  • BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS

    Amos Tversky;Daniel Kahneman

  • Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

    Elizabeth C. Hirschman;Daniel Kahneman;Paul Slovic;Amos Tversky

  • Intransitivity of preferences.

    Amos Tversky

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Daniel Kahneman;Paul Slovic;Amos Tversky

  • Judgment under uncertainty: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

    Amos Tversky;Daniel Kahneman

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Patrick Suppes
Patrick Suppes Stanford University
Paul Slovic
Paul Slovic University of Oregon
R. Duncan Luce
R. Duncan Luce University of California, Irvine
Eldar Shafir
Eldar Shafir Princeton University
Derek J. Koehler
Derek J. Koehler University of Waterloo
Itamar Gati
Itamar Gati Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Glenn Shafer
Glenn Shafer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Itamar Simonson
Itamar Simonson Stanford University
Craig R. Fox
Craig R. Fox University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career paths, especially in mental health counseling. Online programs offer flexible learning options, allowing students to balance studies with work or personal commitments. Popular online degree focuses include clinical psychology, counseling, and behavioral health.

Starting a career as a mental health counselor requires careful attention to local licensure regulations. For example, mental health counselor requirements in Tucson involve specific educational qualifications and supervised clinical experience. If you're looking at options in Oklahoma, discover how to become a mental health counselor in Tulsa, where the pathway includes graduate studies and state-approved exams.

Each region may set unique certification standards. For example, understanding Virginia Beach mental health counselor certification requirements is vital if you plan to practice there. Meanwhile, those interested in federal advocacy or policy work might research how to become a mental health counselor in Washington DC.

With online study and a clear understanding of local requirements, you can map a fulfilling psychology career path wherever you choose to work.

Best Scientists Citing Amos Tversky

Recently Published Articles