D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Business and Management D-index 42 Citations 13,899 119 World Ranking 854 National Ranking 130

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Law
  • Statistics
  • Management

His scientific interests lie mostly in Management science, Delphi method, Scenario planning, Social psychology and Empirical research. His work carried out in the field of Management science brings together such families of science as Technology forecasting and Multitude. His study focuses on the intersection of Delphi method and fields such as Control with connections in the field of Actuarial science and Task.

His Scenario planning study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Scenario analysis, Risk analysis and Process. The study incorporates disciplines such as Private sector, Probabilistic logic, Organization development and Cultural diversity in addition to Social psychology. George Wright has researched Empirical research in several fields, including Empirical evidence, Wideband delphi, Impact factor and Risk perception.

His most cited work include:

  • The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis (1500 citations)
  • The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning (709 citations)
  • Decision Analysis for Management Judgment (696 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

George Wright mainly focuses on Management science, Scenario planning, Process, Knowledge management and Decision analysis. As a part of the same scientific study, George Wright usually deals with the Management science, concentrating on Delphi method and frequently concerns with Control and Dilemma. His Scenario planning course of study focuses on Scenario analysis and Process management.

His research integrates issues of Risk management, Cognitive reframing and Set in his study of Process. His Knowledge management research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Government, Futures studies and Public relations. George Wright combines subjects such as Decision tree and Risk analysis with his study of Decision analysis.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Management science (25.93%)
  • Scenario planning (25.93%)
  • Process (16.05%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Scenario planning (25.93%)
  • Process (16.05%)
  • Futures contract (10.49%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Scenario planning, Process, Futures contract, Management science and Scenario analysis. George Wright has included themes like Range and Decision analysis in his Scenario planning study. His work deals with themes such as Causality, Industrial organization, Competitor analysis, Risk management and Process management, which intersect with Process.

His work in Process management addresses issues such as Delphi method, which are connected to fields such as Crowdsourcing, Causal model and Judgement. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Contrast, Social change, Causation, Technology forecasting and Complement. The Scenario analysis study combines topics in areas such as Organizational strategy and Moral imperative.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Augmenting the Intuitive Logics scenario planning method for a more comprehensive analysis of causation (42 citations)
  • Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process (32 citations)
  • The critical role of history in scenario thinking: augmenting causal analysis within the intuitive logics scenario development methodology (30 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Law
  • Statistics
  • Management

His scientific interests lie mostly in Scenario planning, Management science, Process, Scenario analysis and Causation. His studies deal with areas such as Corporate social responsibility, Strategic planning, Decision analysis, Variety and Stakeholder analysis as well as Scenario planning. His Management science study incorporates themes from Quality, Conceptualization, Risk management, Anticipation and Normative.

His study in Process is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Judgement and Delphi method. His work focuses on many connections between Scenario analysis and other disciplines, such as Positive economics, that overlap with his field of interest in Causality. His Causation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Knowledge elicitation and nobody.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis

Gene Rowe;George Wright.
(1999)

3137 Citations

Decision Analysis for Management Judgment

Paul Goodwin;George Wright.
(1991)

1871 Citations

The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning

Ron M. Bradfield;George Wright;George Burt;George Cairns.
(2005)

1417 Citations

Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory

Gene Rowe;George Wright;Fergus Bolger.
(1991)

923 Citations

Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique

Gene Rowe;George Wright.
(2001)

879 Citations

The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios

K. van der Heijden;R.M. Bradfield;George Burt;George Cairns.
(2002)

687 Citations

Enhancing Strategy Evaluation in Scenario Planning: a Role for Decision Analysis

Paul Goodwin;George Wright.
(2001)

526 Citations

The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue☆

Gene Rowe;George Wright.
(2011)

418 Citations

Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk: myth or reality?

Gene Rowe;George Wright.
Risk Analysis (2001)

358 Citations

Confronting Strategic Inertia in a Top Management Team: Learning from Failure:

Gerard P. Hodgkinson;George Wright.
(2002)

346 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing George Wright

Paul Goodwin

Paul Goodwin

University of Bath

Publications: 38

James H. Lambert

James H. Lambert

University of Virginia

Publications: 25

J. Scott Armstrong

J. Scott Armstrong

University of Pennsylvania

Publications: 22

Lynn J. Frewer

Lynn J. Frewer

Newcastle University

Publications: 19

Gerard P. Hodgkinson

Gerard P. Hodgkinson

University of Manchester

Publications: 18

Mark A. Burgman

Mark A. Burgman

Imperial College London

Publications: 17

William J. Sutherland

William J. Sutherland

University of Cambridge

Publications: 14

Madjid Tavana

Madjid Tavana

La Salle University

Publications: 14

Thomas Gilovich

Thomas Gilovich

Cornell University

Publications: 13

Simon French

Simon French

University of Warwick

Publications: 13

Theodor J. Stewart

Theodor J. Stewart

University of Cape Town

Publications: 13

Gene Rowe

Gene Rowe

Norwich University

Publications: 12

Richard J. Whittington

Richard J. Whittington

University of Sydney

Publications: 11

Lennart Sjöberg

Lennart Sjöberg

Stockholm School of Economics

Publications: 11

Tugrul U. Daim

Tugrul U. Daim

Portland State University

Publications: 11

Roger Bennett

Roger Bennett

Kingston University

Publications: 10

Trending Scientists

Sorin Cristoloveanu

Sorin Cristoloveanu

Grenoble Institute of Technology

Wei Zhang

Wei Zhang

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Alan M. Lambowitz

Alan M. Lambowitz

The University of Texas at Austin

Daniel A. Friess

Daniel A. Friess

National University of Singapore

Alan J. L. Phillips

Alan J. L. Phillips

University of Lisbon

Péter Csermely

Péter Csermely

Semmelweis University

Maria Teresa Bassi

Maria Teresa Bassi

MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology

H B Brewer

H B Brewer

National Institutes of Health

Yunqiang Wang

Yunqiang Wang

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Heping Liu

Heping Liu

Washington State University

Raimo O. Salonen

Raimo O. Salonen

National Institutes of Health

Michael J. Krashes

Michael J. Krashes

National Institutes of Health

Enrique Gracia

Enrique Gracia

University of Valencia

Frank Rauch

Frank Rauch

McGill University

Kwame McKenzie

Kwame McKenzie

University of Toronto

Bill McKelvey

Bill McKelvey

University of California, Los Angeles

Something went wrong. Please try again later.