World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
52
Citations
18878
World Ranking
852
National Ranking
129

George Wright publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Wright sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 148 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

George Wright D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Wright sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Wright is affiliated with the University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields including Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their published work reflects a focus on topics such as the Delphi Technique in Research, Disaster Management and Resilience, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Team Dynamics and Performance, Digital Marketing and Social Media, Climate Change Communication and Perception, and COVID-19 epidemiological studies.

George Wright has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • "Scenario planning and foresight: Advancing theory and improving practice" (2020), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "Delphi with feedback of rationales: How large can a Delphi group be such that participants are not overloaded, de-motivated, or disengaged?" (2021), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "A critical evaluation of 42, large-scale, science and technology foresight Delphi surveys" (2022), published in Futures & Foresight Science
  • "The value of mass-produced COVID-19 scenarios: A quality evaluation of development processes and scenario content" (2022), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "A reflection on the mass production of scenarios in response to COVID-19" (2020), published in Futures & Foresight Science

Frequent collaborators in their recent publications include Bovas Abraham, Monica Adya, Georges Bastin, Keith Beven, and Rajendra Bhansali.

Their work appears consistently in journals such as the Journal of Forecasting, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Futures & Foresight Science, Perception, and Dental Nursing.

Best Publications

  • The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Decision Analysis for Management Judgment

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning

    Ron M. Bradfield;George Wright;George Burt;George Cairns

  • Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory

    Gene Rowe;George Wright;Fergus Bolger

  • The Sixth Sense: Accelerating Organizational Learning with Scenarios

    K. van der Heijden;R.M. Bradfield;George Burt;George Cairns

  • The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue☆

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Enhancing Strategy Evaluation in Scenario Planning: a Role for Decision Analysis

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk: myth or reality?

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Confronting Strategic Inertia in a Top Management Team: Learning from Failure:

    Gerard P. Hodgkinson;George Wright

  • Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: enhancing the scenario method

    George Wright;Paul Goodwin

  • Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process

    Ian Belton;Alice MacDonald;George Wright;Iain Hamlin

  • Interaction of judgemental and statistical forecasting methods: issues &

    Derek Bunn;George Wright

  • The limits of forecasting methods in anticipating rare events

    Paul Goodwin;George Wright

  • Behavioral Decision Theory: An Introduction

    George Wright

  • Assessing the quality of expert judgment: issues and analysis

    Fergus Bolger;George Wright

  • Does the intuitive logics method – and its recent enhancements – produce “effective” scenarios?

    George Wright;Ronald Bradfield;George Cairns

  • Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research

    Fergus Bolger;George Wright

  • CULTURAL VARIATION IN PROBABILISTIC THINKING: ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY*

    George N. Wright;Lawrence D. Phillips

  • Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence

    Gene Rowe;George Wright;Andy McColl

  • Cultural Differences in Probabilistic Thinking

    George N. Wright;Lawrence D. Phillips;Peter C. Whalley;Gerry T. Choo

Frequent Co-Authors

Gene Rowe
Gene Rowe Norwich University
Paul Goodwin
Paul Goodwin University of Bath
Gerard P. Hodgkinson
Gerard P. Hodgkinson University of Manchester
Ann E. Nicholson
Ann E. Nicholson Monash University
John Yearwood
John Yearwood Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can offer greater flexibility and affordability for students interested in business and management careers. Accelerated degree programs are growing in popularity, enabling students to graduate faster than traditional timelines. For those seeking to quickly enter the workforce, consider a fast track bachelor degree in business or related fields.

If cost is a factor, there are many choices for a business degree online, with programs designed to fit a wide range of budgets and schedules. Students interested in the healthcare industry may wish to pursue a health administration degree online, opening doors to vital roles in hospitals, clinics, and medical organizations.

For those looking to advance even further, a healthcare management master’s degree can help unlock leadership opportunities. Each of these pathways allows students to tailor their education to fit their career goals—and all can be pursued remotely to better balance work, life, and study.

Best Scientists Citing George Wright

Trending Scientists