World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 44 1360 1273 574 524 269 7616
Engineering and Technology 43 6157 5938 1713 1586 289 7492

James H. Lambert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James H. Lambert between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James H. Lambert published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2020. 28 of the 355 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2020. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 10 publications
1974 2025

355 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James H. Lambert: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 4
1995 2
1996 5
1997 0
1998 5
1999 8
2000 6
2001 5
2002 10
2003 9
2004 8
2005 8
2006 10
2007 7
2008 4
2009 3
2010 10
2011 18
2012 18
2013 17
2014 13
2015 10
2016 13
2017 22
2018 18
2019 22
2020 27
2021 14
2022 10
2023 18
2024 18
2025 10
Total 355
Download as CSV

James H. Lambert publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 265–269 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 269 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16 269
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

James H. Lambert D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68 44
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

James H. Lambert is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their primary field of study is Engineering, with a focus on areas including Civil and Structural Engineering, Strategy and Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Transportation, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research covers key topics such as Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management, Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis, Risk and Safety Analysis, Transportation Planning and Optimization, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, and Traffic and Road Safety.

Lambert's recent publications include:

  • Trust and security of electric vehicle-to-grid systems and hardware supply chains, 2022, Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • Managing Pandemic Resilience with Other Cascading Disruptions of a Socio-Technical System, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)
  • Evaluating capacity of transportation operations with highway travel time reliability, 2020, Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • Prioritization of Resilience Initiatives for Climate-Related Disasters in the Metropolitan City of Venice, 2021, Risk Analysis
  • Global Systemic Risk and Resilience for Novel Coronavirus and COVID-19, 2021, Risk Analysis

Their frequent co-authors include Zachary A. Collier, Thomas L. Polmateer, Igor Linkov, Cody A. Pennetti, and Davis C. Loose.

Typical publication venues for Lambert's work are:

  • Risk Analysis
  • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
  • Environment Systems & Decisions
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Lambert was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Changing the resilience paradigm

    Igor Linkov;Todd Bridges;Felix Creutzig;Jennifer Decker

  • Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology

    Yacov Y. Haimes;Barry M. Horowitz;James H. Lambert;Joost R. Santos

  • Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling.

    Yacov Y. Haimes;Stan Kaplan;James H. Lambert

  • Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. II: Case Studies

    Yacov Y. Haimes;Barry M. Horowitz;James H. Lambert;Joost Santos

  • Risk of Extreme Events Under Nonstationary Conditions

    J. Rolf Olsen;James H. Lambert;Yacov Y. Haimes

  • Reducing vulnerability of water supply systems to attack

    Yacov Y. Haimes;Nicholas C. Matalas;James H. Lambert;Bronwyn A. Jackson

  • A Survey of Approaches for Assessing and Managing the Risk of Extremes

    Vicki M. Bier;Yacov Y. Haimes;James H. Lambert;Nicholas C. Matalas

  • Tiered Approach to Resilience Assessment.

    Igor Linkov;Cate Fox-Lent;Laura Read;Craig R. Allen

  • Scenario and multiple criteria decision analysis for energy and environmental security of military and industrial installations.

    Christopher W Karvetski;James H Lambert;Igor Linkov

  • A Methodology for

    P. Iiiiisili S. Lu;Joshua L. Tsang;James H. Lambert;Robert C. Patev

  • Identification, ranking, and management of risks in a major system acquisition

    James H. Lambert;Yacov Y. Haimes;Duan Li;Richard M. Schooff

  • Integration of Decision Analysis and Scenario Planning for Coastal Engineering and Climate Change

    C W Karvetski;J H Lambert;J M Keisler;I Linkov

  • Defining resilience analytics for interdependent cyber-physical-social networks

    Kash Barker;James H. Lambert;Christopher W. Zobel;Andrea H. Tapia

  • Selection of Probability Distributions in Characterizing Risk of Extreme Events

    James H. Lambert;Nicholas C. Matalas;Con Way Ling;Yacov Y. Haimes

  • Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies

    Igor Linkov;Benjamin D. Trump;Elke Anklam;David Berube

  • A Risk‐Based Approach to Setting Priorities in Protecting Bridges Against Terrorist Attacks

    Maria Leung;James H. Lambert;Alexander Mosenthal

  • Climate Change Influence on Priority Setting for Transportation Infrastructure Assets

    James H. Lambert;Yao Jan Wu;Haowen You;Andres Clarens

  • Emergent conditions and multiple criteria analysis in infrastructure prioritization for developing countries

    Christopher W. Karvetski;James H. Lambert;Igor Linkov

  • Prioritizing Infrastructure Investments in Afghanistan with Multiagency Stakeholders and Deep Uncertainty of Emergent Conditions

    James H. Lambert;Christopher W. Karvetski;David K. Spencer;Barbara J. Sotirin

  • Evaluating deep uncertainties in strategic priority-setting with an application to facility energy investments

    Christopher W. Karvetski;James H. Lambert

  • Advances in risk analysis with big data

    Tsan-Ming Choi;James H. Lambert

Frequent Co-Authors

Igor Linkov
Igor Linkov Engineer Research and Development Center
Yacov Y. Haimes
Yacov Y. Haimes University of Virginia
Duan Li
Duan Li City University of Hong Kong
Tsan-Ming Choi
Tsan-Ming Choi University of Liverpool
Ortwin Renn
Ortwin Renn University of Stuttgart
Vicki M. Bier
Vicki M. Bier University of Wisconsin–Madison
Anders Levermann
Anders Levermann Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Benoit Montreuil
Benoit Montreuil Georgia Institute of Technology
Russell S. Harmon
Russell S. Harmon North Carolina State University
Kash Barker
Kash Barker University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of career paths—many of which can be launched or advanced with an online degree. Popular options include highly flexible programs like a 2 year construction management degree online. This pathway is ideal for those interested in overseeing building projects and moving into leadership roles quickly.

Healthcare remains a rapidly growing field. Pursuing an online health administration degree prepares graduates for essential managerial roles in hospitals, clinics, and beyond—often without stepping foot in a classroom.

Many learners are seeking faster, more affordable routes to a career. An accelerated degree program allows students to complete their studies in less time, often with options tailored for working adults.

There is also a growing demand for accessible and affordable business education. By choosing from the most reliable business schools online, students can access versatile business degrees to help shape their professional future.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Lambert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles