World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
31152
World Ranking
12168
National Ranking
6240

Ken Resnicow publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Resnicow sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 404 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ken Resnicow D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Resnicow sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ken Resnicow is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with particular specialization in General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Health.

The main topics of their scientific work include:

  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • BRCA Gene Mutations in Cancer
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Some of Ken Resnicow's recent papers illustrating their research interests are:

  • Novel Predictors of COVID-19 Protective Behaviors Among US Adults: Cross-sectional Survey, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Relationship Between Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-Based Survey Study, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Exercise Effects on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, 2020, Cancer Nursing
  • Tobacco Smoking, Cancer and Social Class, 2023, PubMed
  • Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Tailoring: Lessons Learned and Refinements After Two Decades of Incorporating Culture in Health Communication Research, 2023, Annual Review of Public Health

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Minal Patel
  • Michele Heisler
  • Emerson Delacroix
  • John D. Piette
  • Elizabeth Bacon

Ken Resnicow has published multiple articles in venues such as:

  • Gastroenterology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • Preventive Medicine Reports

The diversity of publication venues reflects a multidisciplinary approach engaging clinical, behavioral, and public health domains. Their work covers clinical health interventions, population health strategies, and the integration of cultural sensitivity in health communication.

Best Publications

  • Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified.

    Ken Resnicow;Tom Baranowski;Jasjit S. Ahluwalia;Ronald L. Braithwaite

  • Understanding tailoring in communicating about health

    Robert P. Hawkins;Matthew Kreuter;Kenneth Resnicow;Martin Fishbein

  • Church-Based Health Promotion Interventions: Evidence and Lessons Learned

    Marci Kramish Campbell;Marlyn Allicock Hudson;Ken Resnicow;Natasha Blakeney

  • Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention

    Ken Resnicow;Robin Soler;Ronald L. Braithwaite;Jasjit S. Ahluwalia

  • Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity.

    Matthew M. Davis;Bonnie Gance-Cleveland;Sandra Hassink;Rachel Johnson

  • A Motivational Interviewing Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake Through Black Churches: Results of the Eat for Life Trial

    Ken Resnicow;Alice Jackson;Terry Wang;Anindya K. De

  • Gimme 5 Fruit, Juice, and Vegetables for Fun and Health: Outcome Evaluation

    Tom Baranowski;Marsha Davis;Ken Resnicow;Janice Baranowski

  • Environmental Influences on Dietary Behavior among Children: Availability and Accessibility of Fruits and Vegetables Enable Consumption

    Marsha Davis Hearn;Tom Baranowski;Janice Baranowski;Colleen Doyle

  • Interviewer effects in public health surveys

    R. E. Davis;M. P. Couper;N. K. Janz;C. H. Caldwell

  • Motivational interviewing in health promotion: it sounds like something is changing.

    Ken Resnicow;Colleen DiIorio;Johanna E. Soet;Belinda Borrelli

  • Psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption in adults a review of the literature.

    Abdul R. Shaikh;Amy L. Yaroch;Linda Nebeling;Ming Chin Yeh

  • Motivational interviewing for pediatric obesity: Conceptual issues and evidence review.

    Ken Resnicow;Rachel Davis;Stephen Rollnick

  • Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study.

    Robert P. Schwartz;Robin Hamre;William H. Dietz;Richard C. Wasserman;Richard C. Wasserman

  • Social-cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in children.

    Ken Resnicow;Marsha Davis-Hearn;Matt Smith;Tom Baranowski

  • The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Survey

    Paula Anne Newman-Casey;Alan L. Robin;Taylor Blachley;Karen Farris

  • Body and Soul: A Dietary Intervention Conducted Through African-American Churches

    Ken Resnicow;Marci Kramish Campbell;Carol Carr;Frances McCarty

  • Food purchased away from home as a predictor of change in BMI z -score among girls

    O M Thompson;C Ballew;K Resnicow;A Must

  • Theory as Mediating Variables: Why Aren't Community Interventions Working as Desired?

    Tom Baranowski;Lillian S. Lin;David W. Wetter;Ken Resnicow

  • Motivational Interviewing: moving from why to how with autonomy support

    Ken Resnicow;Fiona McMaster

  • Results of the healthy body healthy spirit trial.

    Ken Resnicow;Alice Jackson;Dhana Blissett;Terry Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Jasjit S. Ahluwalia
Jasjit S. Ahluwalia Brown University
Tom Baranowski
Tom Baranowski Baylor College of Medicine
Geoffrey C. Williams
Geoffrey C. Williams University of Rochester
Michele Heisler
Michele Heisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Donna Cross
Donna Cross Telethon Kids Institute
Matthew R. Smith
Matthew R. Smith Harvard University
Delwyn Catley
Delwyn Catley Children's Mercy Hospital
Karen E. Peterson
Karen E. Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roger D. Vaughan
Roger D. Vaughan Rockefeller University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always begin with medical school. There are many related degrees and certifications you can pursue online, offering flexibility and affordability for students and working professionals.

For those interested in healthcare management, online RHIT degree programs provide foundational knowledge in health information management and prepare you for roles in data and records management within healthcare settings.

If you’re looking for a quick entry into the medical field, consider earning a credential through medical billing and coding certification online. This pathway opens doors to essential administrative roles critical to the effective operation of healthcare facilities.

Nursing continues to be in high demand. Programs such as the cheapest nurse practitioner programs and the cheapest online MSN programs allow registered nurses to advance their qualifications, increase earning potential, and expand clinical responsibilities—all from the convenience of online learning.

No matter your starting point, these online degrees and certifications are affordable, flexible options to launch or advance your healthcare career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Ken Resnicow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles