World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
26090
World Ranking
15088
National Ranking
7619

Sally W. Vernon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally W. Vernon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 340 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sally W. Vernon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sally W. Vernon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sally W. Vernon is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Oncology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Vernon's publication venues feature a range of journals and platforms, notably:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Applied Research on Children Informing Policy for Children at Risk
  • Vaccines
  • Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials

Frequent collaborators include Lara S. Savas, Ross Shegog, C. Mary Healy, Erica L. Frost, and Stanley W Spinner, reflecting an active network of co-authorship within their research community.

Recent publications by Vernon cover various aspects of cancer screening, vaccine hesitancy, trust in medical research, and communication behaviors related to vaccination:

  • "Community Health Workers to Increase Cancer Screening: 3 Community Guide Systematic Reviews" (2022) published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • "Racial/ethnic disparities in use of surveillance mammogram among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review" (2021) published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
  • "Using increased trust in medical researchers to increase minority recruitment: The RECRUIT cluster randomized clinical trial" (2021) published in Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • "Parents' stigmatizing beliefs about the HPV vaccine and their association with information seeking behavior and vaccination communication behaviors" (2023) published in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • "Predictors of overall and test-specific colorectal Cancer screening adherence" (2020) published in Preventive Medicine

Best Publications

  • The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: its use in a community sample.

    Robert E. Roberts;Sally W. Vernon

  • Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review

    Sally W. Vernon

  • The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer

    Lynn A. G. Ries;Phyllis A. Wingo Ph.D.;M.P.H. Daniel S. Miller M.D.;Holly L. Howe

  • Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake among Men and Women in the United States

    Helen I. Meissner;Nancy Breen;Carrie N. Klabunde;Sally W. Vernon

  • Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

    Laura C. Seeff;M.P.H. Marion R. Nadel Ph.D.;Carrie N. Klabunde;B S Trevor Thompson

  • Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: a systematic review.

    Caitlin C. Murphy;L. Kay Bartholomew;Melissa Y. Carpentier;Shirley M. Bluethmann

  • National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15-17, 2002.

    Patrick Dl;Ferketich Sl;Frame Ps;Harris Jj

  • Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.

    Susan A. Sabatino;Briana Lawrence;Randy Elder;Shawna L. Mercer

  • National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom Management in Cancer: Pain, Depression, and Fatigue, July 15-17, 2002.

    Donald L. Patrick;Jürgen Unützer

  • Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults.

    Carrie N. Klabunde;Sally W. Vernon;Marion R. Nadel;Nancy Breen

  • A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices

    Carrie N Klabunde;Paul S Frame;Ann Meadow;Elizabeth Jones

  • Colorectal Cancer Test Use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey

    Jean A. Shapiro;Laura C. Seeff;Trevor D. Thompson;Marion R. Nadel

  • Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review.

    Sally W. Vernon

  • Participation in breast screening programs: a review.

    Sally W. Vernon;Elizabeth A. Laville;Gilchrist L. Jackson

  • Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

    Carrie N. Klabunde;David Lanier;Marion R. Nadel;Caroline McLeod

  • Effects of Language and Ethnic Status on Reliability and Validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-depression Scale with Psychiatric Patients

    Robert E. Roberts;Sally W. Vernon;Howard M. Rhoades

  • Decision latitude, psychologic demand, job strain, and coronary heart disease in the Western Electric Study.

    Toni Alterman;Richard B. Shekelle;Sally W. Vernon;Keith D. Burau

  • Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in association with survival in a large population‐based cohort of elderly patients with colon cancer

    Xianglin L. Du;Shenying Fang;Sally W. Vernon;Hashem El-Serag

  • A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

    Ronald E. Myers;Randa Sifri;Terry Hyslop;Michael Rosenthal

  • Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among U.S. adults, age 50 years and older.

    Vilma E. Cokkinides;Ann Chao;Robert A. Smith;Sally W. Vernon

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria E. Fernandez
Maria E. Fernandez The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Robert E. Roberts
Robert E. Roberts The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Barbara C. Tilley
Barbara C. Tilley The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
William Rakowski
William Rakowski Brown University
Diana J. Burgess
Diana J. Burgess United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Ellen R. Gritz
Ellen R. Gritz The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Carrie N. Klabunde
Carrie N. Klabunde National Institutes of Health
Luisa Franzini
Luisa Franzini University of Maryland, College Park
Paul R. Swank
Paul R. Swank The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Barbara K. Rimer
Barbara K. Rimer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of medicine in the USA offers numerous online degree pathways for students seeking flexibility or alternative routes into healthcare careers. For registered nurses looking to advance, asn to fnp programs provide a seamless bridge toward becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, often designed for working professionals.

For those interested in holistic wellness or public health, pursuing online degrees in nutrition can open doors to roles in clinical settings, research, or health education. These programs equip students with the knowledge to impact community and individual health outcomes.

Leadership-minded students may consider enrolling in cahme accredited online mha programs, which focus on healthcare administration and management. These programs are vital for those aiming to influence healthcare systems at an organizational level.

For RNs wishing to complete their bachelor’s degree quickly, some rn to bsn online with no clinicals programs allow completion without in-person practicums, making it easier for working nurses to advance their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Sally W. Vernon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles