World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4650 4305 222 213 179 9596

Anne Roefs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne Roefs between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne Roefs published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2008. 23 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2008. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne Roefs: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 2
2006 8
2007 2
2008 20
2009 11
2010 15
2011 11
2012 7
2013 10
2014 5
2015 14
2016 13
2017 5
2018 5
2019 9
2020 5
2021 2
2022 11
2023 11
2024 14
2025 9
Total 198
Download as CSV

Anne Roefs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Roefs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 179
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne Roefs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Roefs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anne Roefs is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and focuses their research primarily within the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and sensory systems.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Some of the recent papers associated with Anne Roefs include:

  • "A new science of mental disorders: Using personalised, transdiagnostic, dynamical systems to understand, model, diagnose and treat psychopathology" (2022), published in Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • "Power of mind: Attentional focus rather than palatability dominates neural responding to visual food stimuli in females with overweight" (2020), published in Appetite
  • "Interpersonal Psychotherapy Versus Cognitive Therapy for Depression: How They Work, How Long, and for Whom-Key Findings From an RCT" (2020), published in American Journal of Psychotherapy
  • "Tackling sabotaging cognitive processes to reduce overeating; expectancy violation during food cue exposure" (2020), published in Physiology & Behavior
  • "Food Captures Attention, but Not the Eyes: An Eye-Tracking Study on Mindset and BMI's Impact on Attentional Capture by High-Caloric Visual Food Stimuli" (2022), published in Journal of Cognition

Their collaborations include frequent co-authorship with Anita Jansen, Sieske Franssen, Gerasimos Spanakis, Mandani Ntekouli, and Lourens Waldorp.

Anne Roefs has published multiple times in several venues, with notable frequency in:

  • Appetite
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Physiology & Behavior
  • Journal of Cognition

Their research outputs emphasize experimental and clinical approaches to understanding psychological phenomena, with particular attention to mental disorders, eating behaviors, and sensory and cognitive processes.

Best Publications

  • Impulsivity in obese women

    Chantal Nederkoorn;Fren T.Y. Smulders;Remco C. Havermans;Anne Roefs

  • Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods

    Chantal Nederkoorn;Katrijn Houben;Wilhelm Hofmann;Anne Roefs

  • Hunger is the best spice: an fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex.

    Nicolette Siep;Anne Roefs;Alard Roebroeck;Remco Havermans

  • Overweight children overeat after exposure to food cues.

    Anita Jansen;Nicole Theunissen;Katrien Slechten;Chantal Nederkoorn

  • Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Malte Friese;Anne Roefs

  • Can(not) take my eyes off it: attention bias for food in overweight participants

    Jessica Werthmann;Anne Roefs;Chantal Nederkoorn;Karin Mogg

  • Implicit measures of association in psychopathology research.

    Anne Roefs;Jorg Huijding;Fren T. Y. Smulders;Colin M. MacLeod

  • The interactive effect of hunger and impulsivity on food intake and purchase in a virtual supermarket

    C. Nederkoorn;R. Guerrieri;R.C. Havermans;A.J. Roefs

  • The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction

    Matt Field;Jessica Werthmann;Ingmar Franken;Wilhelm Hofmann

  • Implicit and explicit attitudes toward high-fat foods in obesity.

    Anne Roefs;Anita Jansen

  • External eating, impulsivity and attentional bias to food cues

    Ruihua Hou;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Rona Moss-Morris

  • Happy eating. The underestimated role of overeating in a positive mood

    Peggy Bongers;Anita Jansen;Remco Havermans;Anne Roefs

  • Fighting food temptations: The modulating effects of short-term cognitive reappraisal, suppression and up-regulation on mesocorticolimbic activity related to appetitive motivation

    Nicolette Siep;Anne Roefs;Alard Roebroeck;Remco Havermans

  • Worry or craving? : A selective review of evidence for food-related attention biases in obese individuals, eating-disorder patients, restrained eaters and healthy samples

    Jessica Werthmann;Anita Jansen;Anne Roefs

  • Attentional bias for body and food in eating disorders: increased distraction, speeded detection, or both?

    Elke Smeets;Anne Roefs;Eric van Furth;Anita Jansen

  • Bias for the (un)attractive self: on the role of attention in causing body (dis)satisfaction.

    Elke Smeets;Anita Jansen;Anne Roefs

  • Food liking, food wanting, and sensory-specific satiety

    Remco C. Havermans;Tim Janssen;Janneke C.A.H. Giesen;Anne Roefs

  • A new science of mental disorders: Using personalised, transdiagnostic, dynamical systems to understand, model, diagnose and treat psychopathology

    Unknown

  • Bits and pieces. Food texture influences food acceptance in young children.

    Jessica Werthmann;Anita Jansen;Remco Havermans;Chantal Nederkoorn

  • Negative affect and cue-induced overeating in non-eating disordered obesity.

    Anita Jansen;Annoesjka Vanreyten;Tessa van Balveren;Anne Roefs

  • At first sight: How do restrained eaters evaluate high-fat palatable foods?

    A.J. Roefs;C. Herman;C. Macleod;F.T.Y. Smulders

Frequent Co-Authors

Anita Jansen
Anita Jansen Maastricht University
Chantal Nederkoorn
Chantal Nederkoorn Maastricht University
Remco C. Havermans
Remco C. Havermans Maastricht University
Katrijn Houben
Katrijn Houben Maastricht University
Alard Roebroeck
Alard Roebroeck Maastricht University
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Fren T.Y. Smulders
Fren T.Y. Smulders Maastricht University
Marcus J.H. Huibers
Marcus J.H. Huibers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. Many students are drawn to fields such as counseling, therapy, and mental health services. To work as a licensed professional, you’ll need both the right education and certification credentials, which can vary by location.

For example, those interested in working in Arizona can discover specific mental health counselor requirements in Gilbert or review the Glendale mental health counselor certification requirements. Each city or state may have different steps, such as supervised clinical hours or state exams.

If you’re interested in North Carolina, you can learn how to become a mental health counselor in Greensboro. Those considering a career in Nevada should explore how to become a mental health counselor in Henderson.

Online psychology degrees make it easier to access high-quality training from anywhere. As you plan your path, be sure to research state and city-specific requirements for your intended career.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Roefs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles