World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
8674
World Ranking
8751
National Ranking
4656

Laurence M. Binder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence M. Binder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Laurence M. Binder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence M. Binder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurence M. Binder is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with notable focus areas including Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers several interconnected topics, notably Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Psychometric Methodologies and Testing, Reliability and Agreement in Measurement, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Cognitive Functions and Memory.

Laurence M. Binder has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed articles, with recent papers including:

  • Validity testing in veterans with epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, 2020, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Marked Intraindividual Cognitive Variability in a Sample of Healthy Graduate Students, 2021, Psychological Injury and Law
  • Forced choice test score of p ≤.20 and failures on ≥ six performance validity tests results in similar Overall Test Battery Means, 2023, The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • RBANS Validity Measures and the TOMM in Veterans Undergoing Seizure Monitoring, 2020, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • The rate of psychiatric disorders in veterans undergoing intensive EEG monitoring is associated with symptom and performance invalidity, 2021, The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Psychological Injury and Law
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques

Collaborative efforts are evident through recurring coauthors, such as:

  • Martin Salinsky
  • Daniel Storzbach
  • S Tadrous-Furnanz
  • Glenn J. Larrabee
  • Eliyas Jeffay

This profile reflects Laurence M. Binder's engagement in interdisciplinary study and research contributing to understanding brain injury, cognitive variability, epilepsy, and psychiatric conditions, particularly in veteran populations. Their research outputs include empirical studies focusing on validity testing, cognitive performance, and psychiatric assessment.

Best Publications

  • A review of mild head trauma. part I: Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies

    Laurence M. Binder;Martin L. Rohling;Glenn J. Larrabee

  • Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury

    L Binder;M Rohling

  • Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the postconcussive syndrome.

    Laurence M. Binder

  • Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

    Russell M. Bauer;Grant L. Iverson;Alison N. Cernich;Laurence M. Binder

  • To Err is Human: “Abnormal” Neuropsychological Scores and Variability are Common in Healthy Adults

    Laurence M. Binder;Grant L. Iverson;Brian L. Brooks

  • Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the portland digit recognition test

    Laurence M. Binder

  • Assesment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma.

    Laurence M. Binder;Scott C. Willis

  • A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Re-analyses and Reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009)

    Martin L Rohling;Laurence M Binder;George J Demakis;Glenn J Larrabee

  • A review of mild head trauma. Part II: Clinical implications

    Laurence M. Binder

  • Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain.

    Martin L. Rohling;Laurence M. Binder;Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling

  • Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment.

    Grant L. Iverson;Laurence M. Binder

  • Effects of Gabapentin and Carbamazepine on the EEG and Cognition in Healthy Volunteers

    Martin C. Salinsky;Lawrence M. Binder;Barry S. Oken;Daniel Storzbach

  • Malingering following Minor head trauma

    Laurence M. Binder

  • Constructional strategies on complex figure drawings after unilateral brain damage

    Laurence M. Binder

  • Comment: Warning Malingerers Produces More Sophisticated Malingering

    James R. Youngjohn;Paul R. Lees-Haley;Laurence M. Binder

  • Posttraumatic stress symptomatology is associated with unexplained illness attributed to Persian Gulf War military service.

    Ford Jd;Campbell Ka;Storzbach D;Binder Lm

  • Neuropsychological evidence of a factitious memory complaint

    Laurence M. Binder;Loren Pankratz

  • Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 12-16-week period.

    Martin C. Salinsky;Daniel Storzbach;Carl B. Dodrill;Laurence M. Binder

  • Assessment of Drowsiness in Epilepsy Patients Receiving Chronic Antiepileptic Drug Therapy

    M. C. Salinsky;B. S. Oken;L. M. Binder

  • Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological and Neurobehavioral Tests Self-Administered by Computer

    Keith A. Campbell;Diane S. Rohlman;Daniel Storzbach;Laurence M. Binder

  • A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Re-analyses and Reconsiderations

    Martin L. Rohling;Laurence M. Binder;George J. Demakis;Glenn J. Larrabee

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Storzbach
Daniel Storzbach Oregon Health & Science University
Martin C. Salinsky
Martin C. Salinsky Oregon Health & Science University
Glenn J. Larrabee
Glenn J. Larrabee Veterans Health Administration
Grant L. Iverson
Grant L. Iverson Harvard University
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Paul Rutecki
Paul Rutecki University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ronald M. Ruff
Ronald M. Ruff University of California, San Francisco
Daniel L. Drane
Daniel L. Drane Emory University
Russell M. Bauer
Russell M. Bauer University of Florida
Kevin W. Greve
Kevin W. Greve University of New Orleans

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways. For those interested in the intersection of psychology and the law, what jobs are available with a masters in forensic psychology include roles such as criminal profilers, forensic analysts, or victim advocates.

Similarly, students who focus on organizational behavior may wonder what can you do with a masters in industrial organizational psychology. This field leads to careers in human resources, talent development, and workplace consulting, helping organizations maximize efficiency and well-being.

For those drawn to societal issues, exploring jobs for sociologists can be rewarding. Sociologists often work in research, policy analysis, and community services, closely related to many psychology career options.

More generally, students often ask what do psychology majors do. Graduates find opportunities in counseling, education, business, healthcare, and social services, both in traditional and emerging online roles.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence M. Binder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles