World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6497 6050 3515 3192 192 6393

Robert J. McCaffrey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert J. McCaffrey between 1977 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert J. McCaffrey published across 48 years, from 1977 to 2024, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1999. 4 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1999. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications
1977 2024

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert J. McCaffrey: publications per year, 1977 to 2024
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 3
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 7
1986 2
1987 3
1988 4
1989 5
1990 2
1991 8
1992 13
1993 5
1994 0
1995 4
1996 5
1997 2
1998 0
1999 14
2000 13
2001 6
2002 5
2003 10
2004 6
2005 10
2006 7
2007 8
2008 7
2009 6
2010 3
2011 4
2012 6
2013 3
2014 2
2015 6
2016 3
2017 5
2018 2
2019 0
2020 2
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
Total 207
Download as CSV

Robert J. McCaffrey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. McCaffrey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert J. McCaffrey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. McCaffrey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Robert J. McCaffrey is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Geophysics. Additional areas of study include Epidemiology, Oceanography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

McCaffrey's work spans multiple topics, notably earthquake and tectonic studies and high-pressure geophysics and materials. Other research interests include geological and geochemical analysis, earthquake detection and analysis, traumatic brain injury research, marine and environmental studies, and cognitive functions and memory.

They have published frequently in the following venues:

  • Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Mediterranean Geoscience Reviews
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth

Robert J. McCaffrey has collaborated with several researchers throughout their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
  • Julie K. Lynch
  • Beatriz Cosenza-Muralles
  • Charles DeMets
  • B. Márquez-Azúa

Selected recent publications illustrate the range of their research interests:

  • "Kinematics of the Marmara Region: a fusion of continuum and block models," 2021, Mediterranean Geoscience Reviews
  • "Geodetic Constraints on a 25-year Magmatic Inflation Episode Near Three Sisters, Central Oregon," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "GPS-derived interseismic fault locking along the Jalisco-Colima segment of the Mexico subduction zone," 2021, Geophysical Journal International
  • "Co-seismic and post-seismic deformation for the 1995 Colima-Jalisco and 2003 Tecomán thrust earthquakes, Mexico subduction zone, from modelling of GPS data," 2021, Geophysical Journal International
  • "Assessment of cultural bias on the PdPVTS across gender and racial/ethnic groups," 2022, Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology

Robert J. McCaffrey was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002, indicating their contributions to the field of psychology alongside their geophysical research.

Best Publications

  • Impairments of memory and learning in older adults exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls via consumption of Great Lakes fish.

    Susan L. Schantz;Donna M. Gasior;Elena Polverejan;Robert J. McCaffrey

  • Issues associated with repeated neuropsychological assessments

    Robert J. McCaffrey;Holly James Westervelt

  • The effect of depression and anxiety on the TOMM in community-dwelling older adults

    Lee Ashendorf;Marios Constantinou;Robert J McCaffrey

  • Practitioner's guide to evaluating change with neuropsychological assessment instruments

    Robert J. McCaffrey;Kevin Duff;Holly James Westervelt

  • Is poor performance on recognition memory effort measures indicative of generalized poor performance on neuropsychological tests

    Marios Constantinou;Lyndsey Bauer;Lee Ashendorf;Jerid M. Fisher

  • Practice effects in the prediction of long-term cognitive outcome in three patient samples: A novel prognostic index

    Kevin Duff;Leigh J Beglinger;Susan K Schultz;David J Moser

  • Polychlorinated biphenyl exposure and neuropsychological status among older residents of upper Hudson River communities.

    Edward F. Fitzgerald;Erin E. Belanger;Marta I. Gomez;Michael Cayo

  • The Pocket Smell Test: successfully discriminating probable Alzheimer's dementia from vascular dementia and major depression.

    Kevin Duff;Robert J. McCaffrey;Gary S. Solomon

  • Using the TOMM for evaluating children's effort to perform optimally on neuropsychological measures.

    Marios Constantinou;Robert J. McCaffrey

  • Electrical Injury and Lightning Injury: A Review of Their Mechanisms and Neuropsychological, Psychiatric, and Neurological Sequelae

    Kevin Duff;Robert J. McCaffrey

  • Practice effects predict cognitive outcome in amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Kevin Duff;Constantine G. Lyketsos;Leigh J. Beglinger;Gordon Chelune

  • Practice effects in repeated neuropsychological assessments

    Robert J. McCaffrey;Albert Ortega;Susan M. Orsillo;Wendy B. Nelles

  • Multiple chemical sensitivity: a review of the theoretical and research literature.

    Andrew S. Labarge;Robert J. McCaffrey

  • Are Embedded Validity Indices Equivalent to Free-Standing Symptom Validity Tests?

    Andrea S Miele;Jessica H Gunner;Julie K Lynch;Robert J McCaffrey

  • Motor tests and cognition in healthy older adults.

    Lee Ashendorf;Jana L Vanderslice-Barr;Robert J McCaffrey

  • Psychometric detection of fabricated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Fairbank Ja;McCaffrey Rj;Keane Tm

  • Coverage of the Test of Memory Malingering, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and Word Memory Test on the Internet: Is test security threatened?

    Lyndsey Bauer;Robert J. McCaffrey

  • Olfactory dysfunction discriminates probable Alzheimer's dementia from major depression: a cross-validation and extension.

    Robert J. McCaffrey;Kevin Duff;Gary S. Solomon

  • Exploring age-related decline on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

    Lee Ashendorf;Robert J. McCaffrey

  • Examining the Test Of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort.

    Lyndsey Bauer;Sidney O'Bryant;Julie K. Lynch;Robert J. Mccaffrey

  • Brief reportThe effect of depression and anxiety on the TOMM in community-dwelling older adults

    Lee Ashendorf;Marios Constantinou;Robert J McCaffrey

  • Handbook of Neuropsychological Assessment

    Antonio E. Puente;Robert J. McCaffrey

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Duff
Kevin Duff Oregon Health & Science University
Brandon E. Gavett
Brandon E. Gavett University of Western Australia
John A. Fairbank
John A. Fairbank Duke University
Richard G. Heimberg
Richard G. Heimberg Temple University
Kurunthachalam Kannan
Kurunthachalam Kannan University at Albany, State University of New York
Stewart A. Factor
Stewart A. Factor Emory University
John Seibyl
John Seibyl Yale University
Edward B. Blanchard
Edward B. Blanchard University at Albany, State University of New York
Mary S. Wolff
Mary S. Wolff Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Terence M. Keane
Terence M. Keane Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and specialized career pathways. One especially meaningful path is substance abuse counseling, a growing field with increasing demand across the country.

Online psychology programs often provide the foundational knowledge needed to enter this field. However, becoming a substance abuse counselor involves more than academic study. Requirements can vary significantly by location, including educational background, supervised practice hours, and state-specific licensure.

For example, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Mesa, it’s important to understand Arizona’s unique criteria. Meanwhile, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Miami involves Florida-specific certifications and training.

Similarly, guidance for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Milwaukee and those exploring how to become a substance abuse counselor in Minneapolis can vary according to local requirements.

If you’re considering online psychology degrees, explore each region’s pathway before choosing a program. This ensures you’ll meet all the qualifications needed for your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. McCaffrey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles