World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2036 1846 1187 1051 171 24664

Kyle Brauer Boone publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kyle Brauer Boone between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kyle Brauer Boone published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2000. 8 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2000. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kyle Brauer Boone: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 5
1989 3
1990 1
1991 7
1992 5
1993 8
1994 7
1995 6
1996 7
1997 4
1998 9
1999 5
2000 11
2001 5
2002 10
2003 9
2004 7
2005 4
2006 8
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 8
2011 3
2012 1
2013 6
2014 3
2015 2
2016 0
2017 6
2018 3
2019 2
2020 2
2021 5
2022 4
2023 3
2024 6
2025 2
Total 189
Download as CSV

Kyle Brauer Boone publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle Brauer Boone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 171
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kyle Brauer Boone D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kyle Brauer Boone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Kyle Brauer Boone is affiliated with Alliant International University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on traumatic brain injury, psychological testing and assessment, and forensic psychology, among other topics.

Their recent publications cover a range of subjects within clinical neuropsychology and forensic assessment. Notable papers include:

  • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering, 2021, The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on test security, 2022, The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Forensic neuropsychology: History and current status, 2022, The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Critical Review of Recently Published Studies Claiming Long-Term Neurocognitive Abnormalities in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 2024, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Cross-validation of RAVLT performance validity indicators and the RAVLT/RO discriminant function in a large known groups sample, 2021, The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Boone's research spans several main topics:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Their work is associated with fields and subfields such as:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Boone frequently collaborates with a group of researchers, including:

  • Jerry J. Sweet
  • Tara L. Victor
  • Robert A. Beattey
  • Daniel W Lopez-Hernandez
  • Paul Kaufmann

The primary venues for Boone's publications include:

  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • Professional Psychology Research and Practice
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Psychological Assessment

Kyle Brauer Boone was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria

    D. Neary;J. S. Snowden;L. Gustafson;U. Passant

  • Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment

    Maura N. Mitrushina;Kyle Brauer Boone;Louis F. D'Elia

  • A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex

    James A. Waltz;Barbara J. Knowlton;Keith J. Holyoak;Kyle B. Boone

  • Neuropsychological Correlates of White-Matter Lesions in Healthy Elderly Subjects: A Threshold Effect

    K B Boone;B L Miller;I M Lesser;C M Mehringer

  • Human Psychopharmacology of Hoasca, A Plant Hallucinogen Used in Ritual Context in Brazil

    Charles S. Grob;Dennis J. Mckenna;James C. Callaway;Glacus S. Brito

  • Frontal lobe degeneration: clinical, neuropsychological, and SPECT characteristics.

    B. L. Miller;Jeffrey L Cummings;J. Villanueva-Meyer;K. Boone

  • The temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    T Edwards-Lee;B L Miller;D F Benson;J L Cummings

  • A meta-analysis of the neuropsychological sequelae of HIV infection.

    Mark Reger;Robert Welsh;Jill Razani;David J. Martin

  • Cognition and white matter hyperintensities in older depressed patients.

    I M Lesser;K B Boone;C M Mehringer;M A Wohl

  • Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment, 2nd ed.

    Maura Mitrushina;Kyle B. Boone;Jill Razani;Louis F. D'Elia

  • The association between neuropsychological scores and ethnicity, language, and acculturation variables in a large patient population

    Kyle Brauer Boone;Tara L. Victor;Johnny Wen;Jill Razani

  • The Need For Continuous and Comprehensive Sampling of Effort/Response Bias During Neuropsychological Examinations

    Kyle Brauer Boone

  • Sensitivity and Specificity of Various Digit Span Scores in the Detection of Suspect Effort

    Talin Babikian;Kyle Brauer Boone;Po Lu;Ginger Arnold

  • Neuroanatomy of the self Evidence from patients with frontotemporal dementia

    B. L. Miller;W. W. Seeley;P. Mychack;H. J. Rosen

  • A study of the Lund‐Manchester research criteria for frontotemporal dementia: Clinical and single‐photon emission CT correlations

    B. L. Miller;C. Ikonte;M. Ponton;M. Levy

  • Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia.

    Bruce L. Miller;Kyle Boone;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Stephen L. Read

  • INTERPRETING THE MEANING OF MULTIPLE SYMPTOM VALIDITY TEST FAILURE

    Tara L. Victor;Kyle B. Boone;J. Greg Serpa;Jody Buehler

  • The Rey 15-item recognition trial: a technique to enhance sensitivity of the Rey 15-item memorization test.

    Kyle Brauer Boone;Xavier Salazar;Po Lu;Kimberly Warner-Chacon

  • Progressive right frontotemporal degeneration: clinical, neuropsychological and SPECT characteristics

    Bruce L. Miller;Linda Chang;Ismael Mena;Kyle Boone

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey L. Cummings
Jeffrey L. Cummings University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Linda Chang
Linda Chang University of Maryland, Baltimore
Wilfred G. van Gorp
Wilfred G. van Gorp Columbia University
Barton W. Palmer
Barton W. Palmer University of California, San Diego
Ronald S. Swerdloff
Ronald S. Swerdloff Lundquist Institute
Daniel H. Geschwind
Daniel H. Geschwind University of California, Los Angeles
Glenn J. Larrabee
Glenn J. Larrabee Veterans Health Administration
Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Kevin J. Bianchini
Kevin J. Bianchini University of New Orleans

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse online programs and specialized career pathways in the USA. One fast-growing field is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), for which aspiring professionals often seek Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credentials.

The bcba certification requirements in San Diego emphasize accredited graduate coursework, supervised fieldwork, and successful completion of the BCBA exam. These expectations are similar to those outlined in the bcba certification requirements in San Francisco, where additional local regulations or employer preferences might apply.

Students considering opportunities in the Bay Area can review the San Jose bcba requirements, which also detail key educational steps and supervised practice hours. For those in Southern California, the Santa Ana bcba education requirements outline a similar pathway, highlighting local support for ABA careers.

Whether studying online or in person, understanding these regional variations and requirements is vital for anyone aiming to build a rewarding career in psychology or behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Kyle Brauer Boone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles