World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7896
World Ranking
5444
National Ranking
386

Walter Goetz publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Goetz sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 180 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Walter Goetz D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Goetz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Walter Goetz is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a focus on subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mechanics of Materials, Artificial Intelligence, Ecology, and Paleontology.

The main topics covered in their research encompass Planetary Science and Exploration, Astro and Planetary Science, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils.

Their publication record includes papers in several scientific journals, notably:

  • Overview of the Morphology and Chemistry of Diagenetic Features in the Clay-Rich Glen Torridon Unit of Gale Crater, Mars, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Comparability of heavy mineral data - The first interlaboratory round robin test, 2020, Earth-Science Reviews
  • Testing Flight-like Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry as Performed by the Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer Onboard the ExoMars 2020 Rover on Oxia Planum Analog Samples, 2020, Astrobiology
  • Detection of Copper by the ChemCam Instrument Along Curiosity's Traverse in Gale Crater, Mars: Elevated Abundances in Glen Torridon, 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • The high-resolution map of Oxia Planum, Mars; the landing site of the ExoMars Rosalind Franklin rover mission, 2024, Journal of Maps

Frequently publishing in the following venues, Walter Goetz's work reflects recurring themes in planetary and earth sciences:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (2 publications)
  • Icarus (2 publications)
  • Earth-Science Reviews
  • Journal of Maps
  • Astrobiology

Their collaborations include working with several frequent co-authors:

  • E. Dehouck
  • N. Lanza
  • W. Rapin
  • Pierre-Yves Meslin
  • R. C. Wiens

This profile highlights Walter Goetz's involvement in detailed geochemical and planetary research, particularly related to Mars exploration missions such as those involving the Gale Crater and Oxia Planum landing sites. Their contributions span analytical studies of mineralogy, geochemical mapping, and the detection of elements on Mars' surface, supporting a broad investigation into planetary environments and their exploration technologies.

Best Publications

  • H2O at the Phoenix landing site.

    P. H. Smith;L. K. Tamppari;R. E. Arvidson;D. Bass

  • Habitability on Early Mars and the Search for Biosignatures with the ExoMars Rover

    Jorge L. Vago;Frances Westall;Andrew J. Coates;Ralf Jaumann

  • Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars.

    Douglas W. Ming;P. D. Archer;D. P. Glavin;J. L. Eigenbrode

  • Transient liquid water and water activity at Gale crater on Mars

    F. Javier Martín-Torres;F. Javier Martín-Torres;María Paz Zorzano;Patricia Valentín-Serrano;Ari Matti Harri

  • Martian Fluvial Conglomerates at Gale Crater

    R. M. E. Williams;J. P. Grotzinger;W. E. Dietrich;S. Gupta

  • Curiosity at Gale Crater, Mars: Characterization and Analysis of the Rocknest Sand Shadow

    D F Blake;R V Morris;G Kocurek;Shaunna M Morrison

  • Soil Diversity and Hydration as Observed by ChemCam at Gale Crater, Mars

    P.-Y. Meslin;P.-Y. Meslin;O. Gasnault;O. Gasnault;O. Forni;O. Forni;S. Schröder;S. Schröder

  • Curiosity’s Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) Investigation

    Kenneth S. Edgett;R. Aileen Yingst;Michael A. Ravine;Michael A. Caplinger

  • Possible physical and thermodynamical evidence for liquid water at the Phoenix landing site

    Nilton O. Rennó;Brent J. Bos;David Catling;Benton C. Clark

  • Microscopy capabilities of the Microscopy, Electrochemistry, and Conductivity Analyzer

    M. H. Hecht;J. Marshall;W. T. Pike;U. Staufer

  • The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) Instrument: Characterization of Organic Material in Martian Sediments

    Fred Goesmann;William B. Brinckerhoff;François Raulin;Walter Goetz

  • Pancam multispectral imaging results from the Spirit Rover at Gusev Crater

    James Bell;S. W. Squyres;R. E. Arvidson;H. M. Arneson

  • Athena Microscopic Imager investigation

    Kenneth E. Herkenhoff;S. W. Squyres;J.F. Bell;J.N. Maki

  • The Imager for Mars Pathfinder experiment

    P.H. Smith;M.G. Tomasko;D. Britt;D.G. Crowe

  • Rock Abrasion Tool: Mars Exploration Rover mission

    S.P. Gorevan;T. Myrick;K. Davis;J.J. Chau

  • Pancam multispectral imaging results from the opportunity Rover at Meridiani Planum

    J.F. Bell;S. W. Squyres;R. E. Arvidson;H.M. Arneson

  • Results from the Mars Phoenix Lander Robotic Arm experiment

    R. E. Arvidson;R. G. Bonitz;M. L. Robinson;J. L. Carsten

  • Magnetic Properties Experiments on the Mars Pathfinder Lander: Preliminary Results

    S. F. Hviid;M. B. Madsen;M. B. Madsen;M. B. Madsen;H. P. Gunnlaugsson;H. P. Gunnlaugsson;H. P. Gunnlaugsson;W. Goetz;W. Goetz;W. Goetz

  • Indication of drier periods on Mars from the chemistry and mineralogy of atmospheric dust

    Walter Goetz;Preben Bertelsen;Charlotte S. Binau;Haraldur P. Gunnlaugsson

  • Introduction to special section on the Phoenix Mission: Landing Site Characterization Experiments, Mission Overviews, and Expected Science

    P. H. Smith;L. Tamppari;R. E. Arvidson;D. Bass

Frequent Co-Authors

Morten Madsen
Morten Madsen University of Copenhagen
Olivier Gasnault
Olivier Gasnault Paul Sabatier University
Jeffrey R. Johnson
Jeffrey R. Johnson Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Roger C. Wiens
Roger C. Wiens Los Alamos National Laboratory
James F. Bell
James F. Bell Arizona State University
Samuel M. Clegg
Samuel M. Clegg Los Alamos National Laboratory
Cécile Fabre
Cécile Fabre University of Lorraine
Nina Lanza
Nina Lanza Los Alamos National Laboratory
Violaine Sautter
Violaine Sautter Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gilles Berger
Gilles Berger Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science can lead to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields such as information science and the arts. For those interested in managing and organizing scientific data or research, pursuing online mlis programs accredited ala can be a valuable step. These programs prepare graduates for careers in library and information science, offering strong job prospects and relevance in scientific institutions.

Wondering if library science is a good career? It balances passion for knowledge with growing demand for skilled professionals managing academic and research resources. Earth Science graduates can leverage these skills to contribute to educational and governmental organizations. For more details, visit is library science a good career.

Another exciting pathway is combining Earth Science with creative technology, such as digital photography. Understanding environmental processes through photography can enhance scientific communication and public awareness. Affordable options exist for those considering creative degrees, as highlighted in online photography degree programs.

Veterans seeking to transition into creative fields may find specialized support through photography programs online for veterans. These programs offer tailored resources and flexible learning, enabling veterans to explore new career pathways while applying their unique perspectives to Earth Science-related projects.

Best Scientists Citing Walter Goetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles