World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Scott N. Compton

Scott N. Compton

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4344 4015 2420 2187 172 14982

Scott N. Compton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott N. Compton between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott N. Compton published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2023. 23 of the 202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
1997 2025

202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott N. Compton: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 3
1999 0
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 3
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 3
2010 6
2011 6
2012 4
2013 6
2014 10
2015 13
2016 12
2017 12
2018 13
2019 13
2020 12
2021 13
2022 11
2023 14
2024 13
2025 10
Total 202
Download as CSV

Scott N. Compton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott N. Compton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 172 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 172
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott N. Compton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott N. Compton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott N. Compton is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a significant research footprint in the field of psychology with a focus on clinical psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, education, psychiatry and mental health, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Compton's research addresses a variety of topics, with particular emphasis on autism spectrum disorder research and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Other areas of study include obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, child development and digital technology, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and virology and viral diseases.

Notable recent publications by Compton include:

  • Computational Methods to Measure Patterns of Gaze in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2021, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Early detection of autism using digital behavioral phenotyping, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Umbilical Cord Blood Infusion for Treatment of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2020, The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy for trichotillomania in adults: A randomized clinical trial, 2022, Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) Versus Treatment as Usual (TAU) for Suicidal College Students, 2020, Archives of Suicide Research

Frequent co-authorships have been established with researchers such as Géraldine Dawson, Kimberly L. H. Carpenter, Lauren Franz, Naomi Davis, and John Piacentini.

Scott N. Compton's work has appeared repeatedly in several key publication venues, reflecting a broad engagement with child psychology and psychiatry. These include:

  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • UNC Libraries

Their extensive publication record demonstrates a strong focus on developmental disorders and mental health in children and adolescents, supported by interdisciplinary approaches integrating clinical psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sertraline, or a Combination in Childhood Anxiety

    John T. Walkup;Anne Marie Albano;John Piacentini;Boris Birmaher

  • Relationships Between Poverty and Psychopathology: A Natural Experiment

    E. Jane Costello;Scott N. Compton;Gordon Keeler;Adrian Angold

  • Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for anxiety and depressive disorders in children and adolescents: an evidence-based medicine review.

    Scott N. Compton;John S. March;David Brent;Anne Marie Albano

  • Fluvoxamine for the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents

    John T. Walkup;Michael J. Labellarte;Mark A. Riddle;Daniel S. Pine;Daniel S. Pine

  • Clinical Characteristics of Anxiety Disordered Youth

    Philip C. Kendall;Scott N. Compton;John T. Walkup;Boris Birmaher

  • The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS): Development and Psychometric Properties

    Ma Riddle;Gs Ginsburg;Jt Walkup;Mj Labellarte

  • Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS): rationale, design, and methods

    Scott N Compton;John T Walkup;Anne Marie Albano;John C Piacentini

  • Remission after acute treatment in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders: findings from the CAMS.

    Golda S. Ginsburg;Philip C. Kendall;Dara Sakolsky;Scott N. Compton

  • Review of the evidence base for treatment of childhood psychopathology: externalizing disorders.

    Elizabeth M. Z. Farmer;Scott N. Compton;J. Barbara Burns;Elizabeth Robertson

  • Cognitive Behavior Therapy Augmentation of Pharmacotherapy in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: The Pediatric OCD Treatment Study II (POTS II) Randomized Controlled Trial

    Martin E. Franklin;Jeffrey Sapyta;Jennifer B. Freeman;Muniya Khanna

  • The Treatment of Adolescent Suicide Attempters Study (TASA): Predictors of Suicidal Events in an Open Treatment Trial

    David A. Brent;Laurence L. Greenhill;Scott Compton;Graham Emslie

  • The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry.

    John S. March;Susan G. Silva;Scott Compton;Mark Shapiro

  • Naturalistic Follow-up of Youths Treated for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders

    Golda S. Ginsburg;Emily M. Becker;Courtney P. Keeton;Dara Sakolsky

  • Early childhood OCD: preliminary findings from a family-based cognitive-behavioral approach.

    Jennifer B. Freeman;Abbe M. Garcia;Lisa Coyne;Chelsea Ale

  • Predictors and moderators of treatment response in childhood anxiety disorders: results from the CAMS trial.

    Scott N. Compton;Tara S. Peris;Daniel Almirall;Boris Birmaher

  • Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy

    Daniel Almirall;Scott N. Compton;Meredith L Gunlicks-Stoessel;Naihua Duan

  • Exploring the Impact of Chronic Tic Disorders on Youth: Results from the Tourette Syndrome Impact Survey

    Christine A. Conelea;Douglas W. Woods;Samuel H. Zinner;Samuel H. Zinner;Cathy Budman

  • Family-Based Treatment of Early Childhood Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder The Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study for Young Children (POTS Jr)—A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Jennifer Freeman;Jeffrey Sapyta;Abbe Garcia;Scott Compton

  • Trajectories of change in youth anxiety during cognitive-behavior therapy.

    Tara S. Peris;Scott N. Compton;Philip C. Kendall;Boris Birmaher

  • 24- and 36-week outcomes for the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS).

    John Piacentini;Shannon Bennett;Scott N. Compton;Phillip C. Kendall

  • Results From the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Extended Long-Term Study (CAMELS): Primary Anxiety Outcomes

    Golda S. Ginsburg;Emily M. Becker-Haimes;Courtney Keeton;Philip C. Kendall

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Walkup
John T. Walkup Lurie Children's Hospital
John Piacentini
John Piacentini University of California, Los Angeles
Golda S. Ginsburg
Golda S. Ginsburg University of Connecticut
Anne Marie Albano
Anne Marie Albano Columbia University
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Boris Birmaher
Boris Birmaher University of Pittsburgh
Dara Sakolsky
Dara Sakolsky University of Pittsburgh
John S. March
John S. March Duke University
James T. McCracken
James T. McCracken University of California, Los Angeles
Douglas W. Woods
Douglas W. Woods Marquette University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online can provide tremendous flexibility and accessibility for students across the USA. With accredited online programs becoming more prevalent, states like Illinois and Massachusetts have gained recognition for their standout offerings—see the online psychology degrees in Illinois and the best online psychology program rankings in Massachusetts for examples of top choices.

For those seeking advanced expertise, pursuing a master’s degree online is an excellent next step. Options like the best online psychology master's degree rankings in California and the online psychology master's programs in Florida showcase how students can specialize in different areas such as clinical, counseling, or organizational psychology.

Graduates of online psychology programs have a variety of career pathways in counseling, mental health services, education, and business. Choosing an online degree from a reputable institution can help open doors to these rewarding professions while offering the flexibility to balance education with life’s other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Scott N. Compton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles