World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8606 8040 4589 4180 120 5856

Dara Sakolsky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dara Sakolsky between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dara Sakolsky published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 7 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2017. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1994 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dara Sakolsky: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 8
2012 5
2013 5
2014 12
2015 12
2016 4
2017 13
2018 9
2019 10
2020 8
2021 13
2022 4
2023 9
2024 4
2025 3
Total 125
Download as CSV

Dara Sakolsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dara Sakolsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 120
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dara Sakolsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dara Sakolsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dara Sakolsky is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with significant contributions focused on Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental Health. Additional expertise areas include Speech and Hearing, Education, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics addressed in their work cover Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, Early Childhood Education and Development, and themes related to Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Sakolsky include:

  • Role of Polygenic Risk Score in the Familial Transmission of Bipolar Disorder in Youth, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Social media use and prospective suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adolescents at high risk for suicide, 2021, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • Do youth anxiety measures assess the same construct consistently throughout treatment? Results are...complicated, 2023, Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • A Longitudinal Study of Psychiatric Disorders in Offspring of Parents With Bipolar Disorder From Preschool to Adolescence, 2021, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • The p Factor Consistently Predicts Long-Term Psychiatric and Functional Outcomes in Anxiety-Disordered Youth, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Sakolsky frequently publishes in several academic journals, with notable presence in:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Their most frequent coauthors include:

  • Boris Birmaher
  • Tina R. Goldstein
  • Danella Hafeman
  • John Merranko
  • Benjamin I. Goldstein

Best Publications

  • Clinical Characteristics of Anxiety Disordered Youth

    Philip C. Kendall;Scott N. Compton;John T. Walkup;Boris Birmaher

  • Remission after acute treatment in children and adolescents with anxiety disorders: findings from the CAMS.

    Golda S. Ginsburg;Philip C. Kendall;Dara Sakolsky;Scott N. Compton

  • Diagnostic Precursors to Bipolar Disorder in Offspring of Parents With Bipolar Disorder: A Longitudinal Study.

    David Axelson;Benjamin Goldstein;Tina Goldstein;Kelly Monk

  • Naturalistic Follow-up of Youths Treated for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders

    Golda S. Ginsburg;Emily M. Becker;Courtney P. Keeton;Dara Sakolsky

  • Predictors and moderators of treatment response in childhood anxiety disorders: results from the CAMS trial.

    Scott N. Compton;Tara S. Peris;Daniel Almirall;Boris Birmaher

  • Collaborative care outcomes for pediatric behavioral health problems: a cluster randomized trial.

    David J. Kolko;John Campo;Amy M. Kilbourne;Jonathan Hart

  • Toward the Definition of a Bipolar Prodrome: Dimensional Predictors of Bipolar Spectrum Disorders in At-Risk Youths

    Danella M. Hafeman;John Merranko;David Axelson;Benjamin I. Goldstein

  • Trajectories of change in youth anxiety during cognitive-behavior therapy.

    Tara S. Peris;Scott N. Compton;Philip C. Kendall;Boris Birmaher

  • 24- and 36-week outcomes for the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS).

    John Piacentini;Shannon Bennett;Scott N. Compton;Phillip C. Kendall

  • Results From the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Extended Long-Term Study (CAMELS): Primary Anxiety Outcomes

    Golda S. Ginsburg;Emily M. Becker-Haimes;Courtney Keeton;Philip C. Kendall

  • Assessment of a Person-Level Risk Calculator to Predict New-Onset Bipolar Spectrum Disorder in Youth at Familial Risk.

    Danella M. Hafeman;John Merranko;Tina R. Goldstein;David Axelson

  • Assessing anxiety in youth with the multidimensional anxiety scale for children.

    Chiaying Wei;Alexandra L Hoff;Marianne A Villabø;Jeremy S Peterman

  • Academic Impairment and Impact of Treatments Among Youth with Anxiety Disorders

    Jennifer E. Nail;Jennifer Christofferson;Golda S. Ginsburg;Kelly Drake

  • Psychometrics of the screen for adult anxiety related disorders (SCAARED)- A new scale for the assessment of DSM-5 anxiety disorders

    Melina Angulo;Brian T. Rooks;MaryKay Gill;Tina Goldstein

  • Defining treatment response and remission in child anxiety: signal detection analysis using the pediatric anxiety rating scale.

    Nicole E. Caporino;Douglas M. Brodman;Philip C. Kendall;Anne Marie Albano

  • Somatic Complaints in Anxious Youth

    Sarah A. Crawley;Nicole E. Caporino;Boris Birmaher;Golda Ginsburg

  • Sleep-Related Problems and the Effects of Anxiety Treatment in Children and Adolescents

    Nicole E. Caporino;Kendra L. Read;Nina Shiffrin;Cara Settipani

  • Mood lability among offspring of parents with bipolar disorder and community controls

    Boris Birmaher;Benjamin I Goldstein;David A Axelson;Kelly Monk

  • The Effects of Parental Mood on Reports of Their Children's Psychopathology

    Hagai Maoz;Tina Goldstein;Benjamin I. Goldstein;David A. Axelson

  • The longitudinal course of sleep timing and circadian preferences in adults with bipolar disorder

    Mohammad A Seleem;John A Merranko;Tina R Goldstein;Benjamin I Goldstein

  • Therapist-Reported Features of Exposure Tasks That Predict Differential Treatment Outcomes for Youth With Anxiety.

    Tara S. Peris;Nicole E. Caporino;Sarah O’Rourke;Philip C. Kendall

Frequent Co-Authors

Boris Birmaher
Boris Birmaher University of Pittsburgh
Golda S. Ginsburg
Golda S. Ginsburg University of Connecticut
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Scott N. Compton
Scott N. Compton Duke University
Anne Marie Albano
Anne Marie Albano Columbia University
John Piacentini
John Piacentini University of California, Los Angeles
Tina R. Goldstein
Tina R. Goldstein University of Pittsburgh
John T. Walkup
John T. Walkup Lurie Children's Hospital
David A. Brent
David A. Brent University of Pittsburgh
James T. McCracken
James T. McCracken University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology as a field opens diverse online degree options and career paths. Many students pursue undergraduate and graduate programs online, which offer flexibility and access to specialized fields, such as Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). Online psychology degrees can lead to roles in clinical practice, counseling, education, human resources, and more.

A common pathway for Psychology graduates is becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist. However, certification requirements vary significantly by location. For detailed information on mft requirements in New York City, students should review local steps to licensure. Those planning to practice in New Jersey can check the mft requirements in Newark.

Candidates in Virginia should investigate Norfolk mft certification requirements, as state laws and practicum hours differ. Similarly, those interested in a Nevada practice can learn how to become an mft in North Las Vegas.

Understanding local requirements is essential for anyone considering an online psychology degree and planning their career pathway in therapy or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Dara Sakolsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles