World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
10803
World Ranking
3617
National Ranking
1265

Amy D. Rosemond publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy D. Rosemond sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Amy D. Rosemond D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy D. Rosemond sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Ecological Society of America (ESA)

Overview

Amy D. Rosemond is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a significant concentration on Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Nature and Landscape Conservation. They have also contributed to Water Science and Technology as well as Global and Planetary Change.

Their work covers a range of topics including freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology, soil and water nutrient dynamics, fish ecology and management, hydrology and watershed management, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, hydrology and sediment transport processes, and aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics.

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Seth J. Wenger
  • Jonathan P. Benstead
  • Phillip M. Bumpers
  • Nathan Tomczyk
  • Vladislav Gulis

Common venues for publication of their research include:

  • Ecology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Freshwater Biology
  • Limnology and Oceanography

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Amy D. Rosemond span from 2020 to 2022 and include:

  • Experimental nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment stimulates multiple trophic levels of algal and detrital-based food webs: a global meta-analysis from streams and rivers, 2020, Biological Reviews/Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Transport of N and P in U.S. streams and rivers differs with land use and between dissolved and particulate forms, 2020, Ecological Applications
  • Distorting science, putting water at risk, 2020, Science
  • A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ignoring temperature variation leads to underestimation of the temperature sensitivity of plant litter decomposition, 2020, Ecosphere

Amy D. Rosemond was awarded the title of Fellow of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity

    John C. Moore;Eric L. Berlow;David C. Coleman;Quan Dong

  • Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.)

    A. H. Roy;A. D. Rosemond;M. J. Paul;M. J. Paul;D. S. Leigh

  • Top-Down and Bottom-Up Control of Stream Periphyton: Effects of Nutrients and Herbivores

    Amy D. Rosemond;Patrick J. Mulholland;Jerry W. Elwood

  • Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science

    Seth J. Wenger;Allison H. Roy;C. Rhett Jackson;Emily S. Bernhardt

  • Consumer‐resource stoichiometry in detritus‐based streams

    Wyatt F. Cross;Jonathan P. Benstead;Jonathan P. Benstead;Amy D. Rosemond;J. Bruce Wallace

  • Experimental nutrient additions accelerate terrestrial carbon loss from stream ecosystems

    Amy D. Rosemond;Jonathan P. Benstead;Phillip M. Bumpers;Vladislav Gulis

  • WHOLE‐SYSTEM NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT INCREASES SECONDARY PRODUCTION IN A DETRITUS‐BASED ECOSYSTEM

    W. F. Cross;J. B. Wallace;A. D. Rosemond;S. L. Eggert

  • Seasonally shifting limitation of stream periphyton: response of algal populations and assemblage biomass and productivity to variation in light, nutrients, and herbivores

    Amy D. Rosemond;Patrick J. Mulholland;Susan H. Brawley

  • Interactions among irradiance, nutrients, and herbivores constrain a stream algal community.

    A. D. Rosemond

  • Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial‐aquatic linkages in headwater streams

    L. E. England;A. D. Rosemond

  • Landscape variation in phosphorus concentration and effects on detritus‐based tropical streams

    Amy D. Rosemond;Catherine M. Pringle;Alonso Ramírez;Michael J. Paul

  • Long-term nutrient enrichment decouples predator and prey production

    John M. Davis;Amy D. Rosemond;Susan L. Eggert;Wyatt F. Cross

  • Ecosystem engineering by invasive exotic beavers reduces in-stream diversity and enhances ecosystem function in Cape Horn, Chile

    Christopher B. Anderson;Christopher B. Anderson;Amy D. Rosemond

  • Macroconsumer effects on insect detritivores and detritus processing in a tropical stream

    Amy D. Rosemond;Catherine M. Pringle;Alonso Ramírez

  • Nutrients stimulate leaf breakdown rates and detritivore biomass: bottom-up effects via heterotrophic pathways

    Jennifer L. Greenwood;Jennifer L. Greenwood;Amy D. Rosemond;J. Bruce Wallace;Wyatt F. Cross;Wyatt F. Cross

  • A TEST OF TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP CONTROL IN A DETRITUS-BASED FOOD WEB

    A. M. Y. D. Rosemond;Catherine M. Pringle;Alonso Ramirez;Michael J. Paul

  • The effects of invasive North American beavers on riparian plant communities in Cape Horn, Chile: Do exotic beavers engineer differently in sub-Antarctic ecosystems?

    Christopher B. Anderson;Clayton R. Griffith;Amy D. Rosemond;Ricardo Rozzi;Ricardo Rozzi

  • Ecosystem and physiological scales of microbial responses to nutrients in a detritus-based stream: results of a 5-year continuous enrichment

    Keller Suberkropp;Vladislav Gulis;Amy D. Rosemond;Jonathan P. Benstead

  • Nutrient enrichment reduces constraints on material flows in a detritus-based food web.

    Wyatt F. Cross;J. Bruce Wallace;Amy D. Rosemond

  • Do introduced North American beavers Castor canadensis engineer differently in southern South America? An overview with implications for restoration

    Christopher B. Anderson;Guillermo Martínez Pastur;María Vanessa Lencinas;Petra K. Wallem

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan P. Benstead
Jonathan P. Benstead University of Alabama
John S. Kominoski
John S. Kominoski Florida International University
Wyatt F. Cross
Wyatt F. Cross Montana State University
J. Bruce Wallace
J. Bruce Wallace University of Georgia
John C. Maerz
John C. Maerz University of Georgia
Craig A. Layman
Craig A. Layman Wake Forest University
Catherine M. Pringle
Catherine M. Pringle University of Georgia
Seth J. Wenger
Seth J. Wenger University of Georgia
William H. McDowell
William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire
Patrick J. Mulholland
Patrick J. Mulholland Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution offers a diverse foundation for many career paths. Today, many students explore related subjects through flexible online programs. For example, analytical skills integral to ecology research are also developed in online mathematics degrees, which can lead to roles in data analysis, modeling, or environmental statistics.

Creative careers in science communication are supported by digital skills, often started in online graphic design courses. These courses can help future ecologists design engaging educational materials, presentations, and research visuals.

For students interested in broad, cross-disciplinary careers, an online interdisciplinary studies degree financial aid guide can help make pursuing a customizable and integrative degree more affordable. Such degrees often combine science, policy, and communication—valuable in conservation advocacy and environmental education.

Those with a passion for the history of science or environmental evolution may be interested in an online masters in history, which can open doors to research, teaching, or museum work related to the story of life on Earth.

Best Scientists Citing Amy D. Rosemond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles