World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4596 4254 2554 2310 197 11199

Jonathan S. Comer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan S. Comer between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan S. Comer published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2017. 30 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2017. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 13 publications
2004 2025

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan S. Comer: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 3
2010 8
2011 4
2012 4
2013 16
2014 21
2015 10
2016 17
2017 27
2018 14
2019 16
2020 15
2021 20
2022 12
2023 12
2024 17
2025 13
Total 240
Download as CSV

Jonathan S. Comer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S. Comer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 197
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan S. Comer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S. Comer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jonathan S. Comer is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. The primary field of research is Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Applied Psychology. Their scholarly work spans various aspects of child and adolescent development and mental health.

Recent publication venues featuring their work include:

  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Notable recent papers by Jonathan S. Comer are:

  • "Socioeconomic status and child psychopathology in the United States: A meta-analysis of population-based studies," 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • "A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health," 2022, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Leveraging parent-child interaction therapy and telehealth capacities to address the unique needs of young children during the COVID-19 public health crisis," 2020, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Person-Centered Cultural Assessment Can Improve Child Mental Health Service Engagement and Outcomes," 2021, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • "Therapist-Led, Internet-Delivered Treatment for Early Child Social Anxiety: A Waitlist-Controlled Evaluation of the iCALM Telehealth Program," 2021, Behavior Therapy

The main research topics addressed are:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Youth Substance Use and School Attendance

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Kristina Conroy
  • Jami M. Furr
  • Amanda L. Sanchez
  • Daniel M. Bagner
  • Tara S. Peris

Jonathan S. Comer was awarded Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • A symptom-level examination of parent-child agreement in the diagnosis of anxious youths.

    Jonathan S. Comer;Philip C. Kendall

  • Disasters and Youth: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Posttraumatic Stress

    Jami M. Furr;Jonathan S. Comer;Julie M. Edmunds;Philip C. Kendall

  • Psychosocial treatment efficacy for disruptive behavior problems in very young children: a meta-analytic examination.

    Jonathan S. Comer;Candice Chow;Priscilla T. Chan;Christine Cooper-Vince

  • National trends in child and adolescent psychotropic polypharmacy in office-based practice, 1996-2007

    Jonathan S. Comer;Mark Olfson;Ramin Mojtabai

  • The Effectiveness of School-Based Mental Health Services for Elementary-Aged Children: A Meta-Analysis

    Amanda L Sanchez;Danielle Cornacchio;Bridget Poznanski;Alejandra M Golik

  • Socioeconomic status and child psychopathology in the United States: A meta-analysis of population-based studies

    Matthew Peverill;Matthew Peverill;Melanie A. Dirks;Tomás Narvaja;Kate L. Herts

  • Health-related quality of life across the anxiety disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions (NESARC).

    Jonathan S. Comer;Carlos Blanco;Deborah S. Hasin;Shang-Min Liu

  • Remotely delivering real-time parent training to the home: An initial randomized trial of Internet-delivered parent-child interaction therapy (I-PCIT)

    Jonathan S. Comer;Jami M. Furr;Elizabeth M. Miguel;Christine E. Cooper-Vince

  • Parental accommodation of child anxiety and related symptoms: Range, impact, and correlates

    Johanna Thompson-Hollands;Caroline E. Kerns;Donna B. Pincus;Jonathan S. Comer

  • Terrorism: The Psychological Impact on Youth

    Jonathan S. Comer;Philip C. Kendall

  • Parental Responses to Positive and Negative Emotions in Anxious and Nonanxious Children

    Jennifer L. Hudson;Jonathan S. Comer;Philip C. Kendall

  • American Telemedicine Association Practice Guidelines for Telemental Health with Children and Adolescents

    Kathleen Myers;Kathleen Myers;Eve Lynn Nelson;Terry Rabinowitz;Donald Hilty;Donald Hilty

  • The occasional case against broad dissemination and implementation: Retaining a role for specialty care in the delivery of psychological treatments.

    Jonathan S. Comer;David H. Barlow

  • The intolerance of uncertainty scale for children: a psychometric evaluation

    Jonathan S. Comer;Amy K. Roy;Jami M. Furr;Kristin Gotimer

  • Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments: An Update and a Way Forward

    David H. Barlow;Jacqueline R. Bullis;Jonathan S. Comer;Amantia A. Ametaj

  • Changes in emotion regulation following cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious youth.

    Cynthia Suveg;Erica Sood;Jonathan S. Comer;Philip C. Kendall

  • Emotion-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious youth: A multiple-baseline evaluation

    Cynthia Suveg;Philip C. Kendall;Jonathan S. Comer;Joanna Robin

  • The Relationship Between Anxiety Disorders and Substance Use Among Adolescents in the Community: Specificity and Gender Differences

    Ping Wu;Ping Wu;Renee D. Goodwin;Cordelia Fuller;Xinhua Liu

  • Co-occurring posttraumatic stress and depression symptoms after sexual assault: A latent profile analysis

    Teresa M. Au;Teresa M. Au;Benjamin D. Dickstein;Benjamin D. Dickstein;Jonathan S. Comer;Kristalyn Salters-Pedneault

  • Extending parent-child interaction therapy for early childhood internalizing problems: new advances for an overlooked population.

    Aubrey L. Carpenter;Anthony C. Puliafico;Steven M. S. Kurtz;Donna B. Pincus

  • Missing Data in Psychological Science

    Patrick E. McKnight;Katherine M. McKnight

Frequent Co-Authors

Donna B. Pincus
Donna B. Pincus Boston University
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Jennifer Greif Green
Jennifer Greif Green Boston University
Anne Marie Albano
Anne Marie Albano Columbia University
Mark Olfson
Mark Olfson Columbia University
Annette M. La Greca
Annette M. La Greca University of Miami
David H. Barlow
David H. Barlow Boston University
Cynthia Suveg
Cynthia Suveg University of Georgia
Rinad S. Beidas
Rinad S. Beidas University of Pennsylvania
Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in psychology, there are a range of related online degrees that open doors to rewarding career pathways. Social work is a popular option that equips graduates to support individuals, families, and communities. Thanks to flexible online programs, working professionals and non-traditional students can now pursue these degrees from anywhere.

Choosing the right online program matters. Prospective students should weigh factors like value for money, program reputation, and local job opportunities. For instance, those interested in the Midwest might research the best value online social work degrees in Dubuque or explore the most valuable online social work degree programs in Indiana. In other regions, students can look into the most valuable online social work programs in Kansas or find out about the best value online social work programs in Maryland.

Each pathway offers diverse career outcomes, including clinical roles, school-based positions, and community advocacy. With the demand for mental health and social support professionals on the rise, an online degree can be a solid step toward a meaningful, impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan S. Comer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles