World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
20823
World Ranking
2797
National Ranking
1615

Diane M. Mackie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Mackie sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diane M. Mackie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Mackie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Diane M. Mackie is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, social sciences, and neuroscience, with a notable focus on social psychology and sociology and political science as key subfields. The work addresses several topical areas including cultural differences and values, behavioral health and interventions, social and intergroup psychology, emotions and moral behavior, climate change communication and perception, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and action observation and synchronization.

The scholar has contributed significantly to academic literature, publishing in journals such as Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Their recent publications include:

  • Perceptions of Emotional Functionality: Similarities and Differences Among Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures, 2022, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Group-Based Emotions Over Time: Dynamics of Experience and Regulation, 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Group-based emotion processes generalize across group exemplars and types, 2023, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Descriptive and injunctive emotion norms and identification influence group-based emotions, 2025, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

The frequent coauthors working collaboratively with Diane M. Mackie include Eliot R. Smith, Heather M. Claypool, Anudhi Munasinghe, Leila T. Worth, and Angela T. Maitner, indicating sustained professional partnerships particularly with Smith and Claypool.

  • Eliot R. Smith
  • Heather M. Claypool
  • Anudhi Munasinghe
  • Leila T. Worth
  • Angela T. Maitner

The prominent publication venues connected to this researcher are:

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Diane M. Mackie's work has been recognized through distinctions such as being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017. This affiliation highlights the researcher's integration within the scientific community and contribution to advancing knowledge in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

    Diane M. Mackie;Thierry Devos;Eliot R. Smith

  • Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion.

    Diane M. Mackie;Leila T. Worth

  • Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria.

    Eliot R. Smith;Charles R. Seger;Diane M. Mackie

  • Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception.

    Diane M. Mackie;David Lewis Hamilton

  • Processing of persuasive in-group messages.

    Diane M. Mackie;Leila T. Worth;Arlene G. Asuncion

  • Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments.

    Durairaj Maheswaran;Diane M. Mackie;Shelly Chaiken

  • Intergroup Relations: Insights From a Theoretically Integrative Approach

    Diane M. Mackie;Eliot R. Smith

  • Gender and Computers: Two Surveys of Computer-Related Attitudes.

    Gita Wilder;Diane Mackie;Joel Cooper

  • Cognitive Mediation of Positive Affect in Persuasion

    Leila T. Worth;Diane M. Mackie

  • Social identification effects in group polarization.

    Diane M. Mackie

  • Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications.

    Diane M. Mackie

  • Social psychology, 3rd ed.

    Eliot R. Smith;Diane M. Mackie

  • Of two minds: forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes.

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell;Diane M. Mackie;Laura M. Strain

  • Improving the Dependability of Research in Personality and Social Psychology Recommendations for Research and Educational Practice

    David C. Funder;John M. Levine;Diane M. Mackie;Carolyn C. Morf

  • Feeling Good, But Not Thinking Straight: The Impact of Positive Mood on Persuasion

    Diane M. Mackie;Leila T. Worth

  • From prejudice to intergroup emotions : differentiated reactions to social groups

    Diane M. Mackie;Eliot R. Smith

  • Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations.

    Diane M. Mackie;Eliot R. Smith;Devin G. Ray

  • Mood effects on attitude judgments: independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration.

    Herbert Bless;Diane M. Mackie;Norbert Schwarz

  • Knowledge of the Advocated Position and the Processing of In-Group and Out-Group Persuasive Messages

    Diane M. MacKie;M. Cecilia Gastardo-Conaco;John J. Skelly

  • Attitude prototypes as determinants of attitude-behavior consistency.

    Charles G. Lord;Mark R. Lepper;Diane Mackie

  • Can emotions be truly group-level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria: (633942013-867)

    Charles Seger;Eliot Smith;Diane Mackie

Frequent Co-Authors

Eliot R. Smith
Eliot R. Smith Indiana University
Robert J. Rydell
Robert J. Rydell Indiana University
David L. Hamilton
David L. Hamilton University of California, Santa Barbara
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University
Allen R. McConnell
Allen R. McConnell Miami University
Roger Giner-Sorolla
Roger Giner-Sorolla University of Kent
Shelly Chaiken
Shelly Chaiken New York University
Jeffrey W. Sherman
Jeffrey W. Sherman University of California, Davis
Herbert Bless
Herbert Bless University of Mannheim
Kurt Hugenberg
Kurt Hugenberg Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens up a wide range of online study options and career pathways, especially for those interested in counseling professions. Many accredited universities now offer flexible online programs, making it easier to balance your studies with work or other commitments.

If you aim to start your counseling career quickly, consider state-specific programs tailored for efficiency. For example, the Alabama fastest counseling programs provide accelerated courses that help students enter the field sooner. Similarly, you can explore the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Alaska or look into the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Arizona, each offering unique curriculum structures that cut down on completion time.

Additionally, Arkansas offers a variety of Arkansas accelerated counseling programs designed for those who wish to fast-track their credentials. These programs often include internships and licensing prep, positioning graduates for success in a range of mental health and counseling roles.

Best Scientists Citing Diane M. Mackie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles