World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4336 4007 239 231 150 15544

Craig McGarty publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Craig McGarty between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Craig McGarty published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2021. 10 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2021. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1988 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Craig McGarty: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 3
1994 3
1995 3
1996 5
1997 1
1998 3
1999 4
2000 3
2001 7
2002 9
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 9
2010 3
2011 2
2012 7
2013 5
2014 5
2015 6
2016 8
2017 8
2018 7
2019 8
2020 4
2021 13
2022 5
2023 4
2024 6
2025 4
Total 165
Download as CSV

Craig McGarty publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig McGarty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Craig McGarty D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig McGarty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Craig McGarty is affiliated with Western Sydney University in Australia. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences and psychology, focusing particularly on collective action, social identity, and group dynamics.

The main fields of study for McGarty include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Their work further specializes in subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

McGarty's primary research topics cover:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by McGarty include:

  • The Volatility of Collective Action: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Data (2020, Political Psychology)
  • MOBILISE: A Higher-Order Integration of Collective Action Research to Address Global Challenges (2022, Political Psychology)
  • How Collective-Action Failure Shapes Group Heterogeneity and Engagement in Conventional and Radical Action Over Time (2021, Psychological Science)
  • Failure Leads Protest Movements to Support More Radical Tactics (2021, Social Psychological and Personality Science)
  • Testing social identity models of collective action in an Iranian environmental movement (2021, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McGarty are:

  • Emma F. Thomas
  • Winnifred R. Louis
  • Morgana Lizzio-Wilson
  • Catherine E. Amiot
  • Fathali M. Moghaddam

The scholar has multiple publications in well-known academic venues which include:

  • Political Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Psychological Science
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science

Best Publications

  • Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context:

    John C. Turner;Penelope J. Oakes;S. Alexander Haslam;Craig McGarty

  • Stereotypes as explanations : the formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups

    Craig McGarty;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Russell Spears

  • Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action:

    Emma F. Thomas;Craig McGarty;Kenneth I. Mavor

  • Transforming “Apathy Into Movement”:The Role of Prosocial Emotions in Motivating Action for Social Change

    Emma F. Thomas;Craig McGarty;Kenneth I. Mavor

  • Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action

    Ana-Maria Bliuc;Craig McGarty;Katherine J Reynolds;Daniela Muntele

  • Collective Action as the Material Expression of Opinion‐Based Group Membership

    Craig Austin McGarty;Ana-Maria Bliuc;Emma Thomas;Renata Bongiorno

  • Categorization in social psychology

    Craig McGarty

  • Identifiability and self‐presentation: Computer‐mediated communication and intergroup interaction

    Karen M. Douglas;Craig McGarty

  • Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference

    S. Alexander Haslam;John C. Turner;Penelope J. Oakes;Craig McGarty

  • Stereotyping and social influence : The mediation of stereotype applicability and sharedness by the views of in-group and out-group members

    S. Alexander Haslam;Penelope J. Oakes;Craig McGarty;John C. Turner

  • Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action

    Emma F. Thomas;Emma F. Thomas;Kenneth I. Mavor;Craig McGarty

  • Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities

    Ana-Maria Bliuc;Craig Austin McGarty;Emma F Thomas;Girish Lala

  • Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology

    S. Alexander Haslam;Craig McGarty

  • The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus.

    S. Alexander Haslam;John C. Turner;Penelope J. Oakes;Craig McGarty

  • The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction

    Emma F. Thomas;Craig A. McGarty;Craig A. McGarty

  • Social categorization and group homogeneity: changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness.

    S. Alexander Haslam;Penelope J. Oakes;John C. Turner;Craig McGarty

  • Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology.

    Craig McGarty;Anne Pedersen;Colin Wayne Leach;Tamarra Mansell

  • The Effects of Salient Group Memberships on Persuasion

    Craig Mcgarty;S. Alexander Haslam;Karen J. Hutchinson;John C. Turner

  • New Technologies, New Identities, and the Growth of Mass Opposition in the Arab Spring

    Craig Austin McGarty;Emma F Thomas;Girish Lala;Laura Ge Smith

  • Social, cultural and cognitive factors in stereotype formation

    Craig McGarty;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Russell Spears

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Alexander Haslam
S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland
John C. Turner
John C. Turner Australian National University
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Penelope J. Oakes
Penelope J. Oakes Australian National University
Karen M. Douglas
Karen M. Douglas University of Kent
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Katherine J. Reynolds
Katherine J. Reynolds Australian National University
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland
Catherine E. Amiot
Catherine E. Amiot University of Quebec at Montreal
Joop van der Pligt
Joop van der Pligt University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology offers a wide range of career pathways both online and through traditional programs. Many students choose to become licensed therapists, a profession that is highly sought after nationwide. However, it’s important to understand that requirements can vary depending on your location.

For example, those interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Kansas City must meet specific educational and clinical experience standards. Similarly, understanding the licensed therapist requirements in Laredo is crucial if you plan to practice in that area.

Education requirements can differ across states. For instance, the Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements have unique aspects that aspiring professionals must follow. If you’re considering practice in Kentucky, learn about how to become a licensed therapist in Lexington.

Exploring these pathways and understanding state-by-state guidelines will help you choose the right online psychology program and smooth your path to a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Craig McGarty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles