World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
67577
World Ranking
2311
National Ranking
1345

Shelly Chaiken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelly Chaiken sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shelly Chaiken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelly Chaiken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shelly Chaiken is affiliated with New York University in the United States. The available information does not include specific research papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues linked to their work.

Details about Shelly Chaiken's main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics have not been documented in the provided data.

There is no available record of book publications associated with Shelly Chaiken.

No awards are listed in the source data for Shelly Chaiken.

Best Publications

  • The psychology of attitudes.

    Alice Hendrickson Eagly;Shelly Chaiken

  • Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.

    Shelly Chaiken

  • Dual-process theories in social psychology

    Shelly Chaiken;Yaacov Trope

  • Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context.

    Shelly Chaiken;Akiva Liberman;Alice H. Eagly

  • The heuristic model of persuasion.

    Shelly Chaiken

  • Attitude structure and function.

    Alice H. Eagly;Shelly Chaiken

  • Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing : effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment

    Shelly Chaiken;Durairaj Maheswaran

  • The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context.

    Serena Chen;Shelly Chaiken

  • The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.

    John A. Bargh;Shelly Chaiken;Rajen Govender;Felicia Pratto

  • The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.

    Beth E. Meyerowitz;Shelly Chaiken

  • The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude

    Alice H. Eagly;Shelly Chaiken

  • Attitudes and Attitude Change

    Shelly Chaiken;Charles Stangor

  • Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.

    Unknown

  • Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.

    Durairaj Maheswaran;Shelly Chaiken

  • Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change

    Alice H. Eagly;Wendy Wood;Shelly Chaiken

  • Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Health Messages

    Akiva liberman;Shelly Chaiken

  • Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion.

    Shelly Chaiken

  • Gender Differences in Concern with Body Weight and Physical Appearance Over the Life Span

    Patricia Pliner;Shelly Chaiken;Gordon L. Flett

  • Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing.

    Shelly Chaiken;Roger Giner-Sorolla;Serena Chen

  • The Automatic Evaluation Effect: Unconditional Automatic Attitude Activation with a Pronunciation Task

    John A. Bargh;Shelly Chaiken;Paula Raymond;Charles Hymes

  • Attitude strength and resistance processes.

    Eva M. Pomerantz;Shelly Chaiken;Rosalind S. Tordesillas

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University
Serena Chen
Serena Chen University of California, Berkeley
John A. Bargh
John A. Bargh Yale University
Patricia Pliner
Patricia Pliner University of Toronto
Gerd Bohner
Gerd Bohner Bielefeld University
Roger Giner-Sorolla
Roger Giner-Sorolla University of Kent
Yaacov Trope
Yaacov Trope New York University
Wendy Wood
Wendy Wood University of Southern California
Durairaj Maheswaran
Durairaj Maheswaran New York University
Gordon L. Flett
Gordon L. Flett York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in pursuing a psychology degree in the USA, several online programs can help launch your career as a mental health professional. These programs provide a flexible route to meeting the educational requirements for roles such as counselors, therapists, and social workers.

Requirements for becoming a mental health counselor often vary by location. For example, those interested in practicing in Ohio should review the Cincinnati mental health counselor certification requirements as well as the Cleveland mental health counselor education requirements. Each area may mandate specific state certifications, supervised training hours, or exams.

Aspiring professionals in Colorado can follow this step-by-step guide on how to become a mental health counselor in Colorado Springs. Additionally, students aiming to work in Columbus should consult the Columbus mental health counselor education requirements.

By understanding these requirements and enrolling in accredited online psychology degrees, you can take the next step toward a rewarding career in mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Shelly Chaiken

Recently Published Articles