World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Allen R. McConnell

Allen R. McConnell

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8080 7540 4328 3936 71 10951

Allen R. McConnell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Allen R. McConnell between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Allen R. McConnell published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2009. 4 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2009. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Allen R. McConnell: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 4
2008 2
2009 7
2010 1
2011 4
2012 1
2013 5
2014 4
2015 1
2016 3
2017 2
2018 2
2019 3
2020 1
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Total 79
Download as CSV

Allen R. McConnell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen R. McConnell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 71
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Allen R. McConnell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen R. McConnell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Allen R. McConnell is affiliated with Miami University in the United States. Their work spans several intersecting disciplines, primarily Psychology and Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields such as Social Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, and Genetics.

Their research topics cover a diverse range of themes including Environmental Education and Sustainability, Animal and Plant Science Education, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Human-Animal Interaction Studies, Media Influence and Health, Behavioral Health and Interventions, and Climate Change Communication and Perception.

McConnell has contributed to the academic community through publications in various venues. Most frequently, their work appears in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, where they have published three articles. Other venues include Sustainability, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Information Systems Research, and Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by McConnell include:

  • Self-transcendent emotion dispositions: Greater connections with nature and more sustainable behavior (2022, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • Too Tired and in Too Good of a Mood to Worry About Privacy: Explaining the Privacy Paradox Through the Lens of Effort Level in Information Processing (2022, Information Systems Research)
  • Self-nature representations: On the unique consequences of nature-self size on pro-environmental action (2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • Race Deficits in Pain Detection: Medical Providers and Laypeople Fail to Accurately Perceive Pain Authenticity Among Black People (2021, Social Psychological and Personality Science)
  • Nature's Best Friend: Viewing Pets as Having Greater Emotional Experience Increases Ecological Concern (2023, Anthrozoös)

Frequent collaborators in McConnell's work include Tyler P. Jacobs, Kurt Hugenberg, LaCount J. Togans, Tawfiq Alashoor, and Mark Keil. Tyler P. Jacobs is the most frequent coauthor, collaborating on six publications.

Best Publications

  • Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes

    Allen R. McConnell;Jill M. Leibold

  • Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change : A systems of reasoning analysis

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell

  • Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership.

    Allen R. McConnell;Christina M. Brown;Tonya M. Shoda;Laura E. Stayton

  • Stereotype threat and working memory: mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover.

    Sian L. Beilock;Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell

  • The Multiple Self-Aspects Framework: Self-Concept Representation and Its Implications

    Allen R. McConnell

  • Of two minds: forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes.

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell;Diane M. Mackie;Laura M. Strain

  • Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory.

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell;Sian L. Beilock

  • On the Causal Mechanisms of Stereotype Threat: Can Skills That Don't Rely Heavily on Working Memory Still Be Threatened?

    Sian L. Beilock;William A. Jellison;Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell

  • Research Commentary—Informing Privacy Research Through Information Systems, Psychology, and Behavioral Economics: Thinking Outside the “APCO” Box

    Tamara Dinev;Allen R. McConnell;H. Jeff Smith

  • Target entitativity: implications for information processing about individual and group targets.

    Allen R. McConnell;Steven J. Sherman;David L. Hamilton

  • Do Racial Minorities Respond in the Same Way to Mainstream Beauty Standards? Social Comparison Processes in Asian, Black, and White Women

    Peggy Chin Evans;Allen R. McCONNELL

  • Implicit and Explicit Measures of Sexual Orientation Attitudes: In Group Preferences and Related Behaviors and Beliefs among Gay and Straight Men

    William A. Jellison;Allen R. McConnell;Shira Gabriel

  • Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell;Laura M. Strain;Heather M. Claypool

  • On-line and memory-based aspects of individual and group target judgments.

    Allen R. McConnell;Steven J. Sherman;David L. Hamilton

  • Reactance, Compliance, and Anticipated Regret ☆

    Matthew T. Crawford;Allen R. McConnell;Amy C. Lewis;Steven J. Sherman

  • Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking: When alternatives to reality fail us.

    Steven J. Sherman;Allen R. McConnell

  • What if I find it cheaper someplace else?: Role of prefactual thinking and anticipated regret in consumer behavior

    Allen R. McConnell;Keith E. Niedermeier;Jill M. Leibold;Amani G. El-Alayli

  • Consequences of discrepant explicit and implicit attitudes: Cognitive dissonance and increased information processing

    Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell;Diane M. Mackie

  • Stereotype threat and sport: can athletic performance be threatened?

    Sian L. Beilock;Allen R. McConnell

  • We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing

    Allen R. McConnell;E. Paige Lloyd;Brandon T. Humphrey

  • Forming implicit and explicit attitudes toward individuals: social group association cues.

    Allen R. McConnell;Robert J. Rydell;Laura M. Strain;Diane M. Mackie

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Rydell
Robert J. Rydell Indiana University
Steven J. Sherman
Steven J. Sherman Indiana University
Kurt Hugenberg
Kurt Hugenberg Indiana University
Sian L. Beilock
Sian L. Beilock Barnard College
Diane M. Mackie
Diane M. Mackie University of California, Santa Barbara
David L. Hamilton
David L. Hamilton University of California, Santa Barbara
Thomas H. Carr
Thomas H. Carr Michigan State University
Elizabeth W. Dunn
Elizabeth W. Dunn University of British Columbia
Russell H. Fazio
Russell H. Fazio The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding careers, especially in mental health counseling. Online degrees in psychology or counseling offer flexibility for students who want to gain the required knowledge while managing other commitments. These programs typically cover foundational subjects such as human development, counseling theories, and ethical practices.

However, career pathways often require more than just a degree. For those interested in becoming a counselor, it’s crucial to understand local requirements, which can vary by city and state. For example, the mental health counselor requirements in Santa Ana include specific academic credentials and supervised clinical experience. If you’re considering working in Arizona, review the Scottsdale mental health counselor education requirements to meet local regulations. Likewise, both the Seattle mental health counselor education requirements and Spokane mental health counselor education requirements highlight the importance of accredited degrees and licensing exams.

Before enrolling, prospective students should research programs that align with their intended career location and meet all licensure prerequisites. This ensures a smoother pathway from graduation to professional practice.

Best Scientists Citing Allen R. McConnell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles