World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4718 4370 2618 2369 144 16713

Thomas H. Carr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas H. Carr between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas H. Carr published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1985. 2 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1985. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 14 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1971 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas H. Carr: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 5
1977 2
1978 2
1979 3
1980 1
1981 4
1982 2
1983 11
1984 6
1985 14
1986 12
1987 3
1988 1
1989 5
1990 6
1991 1
1992 4
1993 1
1994 4
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 4
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 7
2003 3
2004 3
2005 5
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 0
2012 2
2013 3
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 3
2020 1
2021 0
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 160
Download as CSV

Thomas H. Carr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Carr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 144
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas H. Carr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Carr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas H. Carr is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with specific subfields including Epidemiology, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Organic Chemistry.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics, which include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Connexins and lens biology
  • Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Thomas H. Carr has contributed to multiple scientific publications across various journals. Recent papers authored or coauthored by them include:

  • "Pannexin 1 as a driver of inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injury" (2021, Purinergic Signalling)
  • "Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries in Mice during Adolescence Cause Sexually Dimorphic Behavioral Deficits and Neuroinflammatory Dynamics" (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • "Repeated mild traumatic brain injuries in mice cause age- and sex-specific alterations in dendritic spine density" (2022, Experimental Neurology)
  • "Examining the Progressive Behavior and Neuropathological Outcomes Associated with Chronic Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats" (2020, Cerebral Cortex Communications)
  • "Development of a Safe and Scalable Method to Prepare 3-Bromo-N-alkyl-1,6-naphthyridones via Enamine Cyclization" (2024, Organic Process Research & Development)

The venues where Thomas H. Carr's work is frequently published include:

  • Purinergic Signalling
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Experimental Neurology
  • Cerebral Cortex Communications
  • Organic Process Research & Development

Collaboration is part of this scientist's research process, with frequent coauthors comprising:

  • Alexander W. Lohman
  • Eric Eyolfson
  • Richelle Mychasiuk
  • Michael Koval
  • Aleksandra Cwiek

The scientist's work covers a range of intricate topics relevant to brain injury research, neuroinflammation dynamics, behavioral neuroscience, and chemical synthesis methods. Their contributions span experimental studies in animal models, focusing on brain injury effects that vary by age and sex, as well as novel chemical process developments.

Best Publications

  • On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure?

    Sian L. Beilock;Thomas H. Carr

  • Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language

    Thomas H. Carr;Dale Dagenbach

  • When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills

    Sian L. Beilock;Thomas H. Carr;Clare MacMahon;Janet L. Starkes

  • When High-Powered People Fail Working Memory and “Choking Under Pressure” in Math

    Sian L. Beilock;Thomas H. Carr

  • More on the Fragility of Performance: Choking Under Pressure in Mathematical Problem Solving

    Sian L. Beilock;Catherine A. Kulp;Lauren E. Holt;Thomas H. Carr

  • Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills.

    Sian L. Beilock;Bennett I. Bertenthal;Annette M. Mccoy;Thomas H. Carr

  • Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.

    Thomas H. Carr;Charley McCauley;Richard D. Sperber;C. M. Parmelee

  • Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception.

    Dale Dagenbach;Thomas H Carr;AnneLise Wilhelmsen

  • Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space

    Catherine M. Arrington;Thomas H. Carr;Andrew R. Mayer;Stephen M. Rao

  • On the Causal Mechanisms of Stereotype Threat: Can Skills That Don't Rely Heavily on Working Memory Still Be Threatened?

    Sian L. Beilock;William A. Jellison;Robert J. Rydell;Allen R. McConnell

  • Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition.

    Thomas H. Carr;Dale Dagenbach

  • Cognitive Factors in Learning about Structured Sequences: Applications to Syntax

    Thomas H. Carr;Tim Curran

  • Reading and Its Development: Component Skills Approaches

    Thomas H. Carr;Betty Ann Levy

  • Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory.

    Sian L Beilock;Sarah A Wierenga;Thomas H Carr

  • Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited

    Betsy Williams;Gayathri Narasimham;Bjoern Rump;Timothy P. McNamara

  • Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification

    Charley McCauley;C. M. Parmelee;Richard D. Sperber;Thomas H. Carr

  • Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI

    Jie Huang;Thomas H. Carr;Yue Cao

  • Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.

    Thomas H. Carr;Brian J. Davidson;Harold L. Hawkins

  • Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese.

    Margot Haynes;Thomas H. Carr

  • Deficient attention is hard to find: applying the perceptual load model of selective attention to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes

    Cynthia L. Huang-Pollock;Joel T. Nigg;Thomas H. Carr

Frequent Co-Authors

Sian L. Beilock
Sian L. Beilock Barnard College
Bobby Bodenheimer
Bobby Bodenheimer Vanderbilt University
John J. Rieser
John J. Rieser Vanderbilt University
Timothy P. McNamara
Timothy P. McNamara Vanderbilt University
Michael I. Posner
Michael I. Posner University of Oregon
Michael Hoerger
Michael Hoerger Tulane University
Alexander Pollatsek
Alexander Pollatsek University of Massachusetts Amherst
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Bennett I. Bertenthal Indiana University
Richard E. Lucas
Richard E. Lucas Michigan State University
Joel T. Nigg
Joel T. Nigg Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Psychology in the USA, consider the related fields and diverse career paths available. Many students combine online Psychology degrees with other specialties like speech-language pathology, counseling, or social work. With the growing demand for mental health and communication professionals, online programs offer flexibility to gain the necessary credentials while you balance other commitments.

For example, becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP) is a rewarding option. Each state has unique requirements, so it's important to review local guidelines. You can learn more about Nebraska slp certification requirements and Nevada speech pathologist certification requirements before applying for online SLP programs. Similarly, those considering a move or practice in New England should familiarize themselves with slp requirements in New Hampshire.

For anyone interested in the New Jersey area, explore the process of becoming a speech therapist in New Jersey to understand licensing and career opportunities. Exploring these related pathways can expand your professional potential as a graduate of a Psychology program.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas H. Carr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles