World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
7774
World Ranking
5602
National Ranking
937

Karen Rodham publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Rodham sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Karen Rodham D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Rodham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen Rodham is affiliated with the University of Chichester in the United Kingdom and has a multifaceted research profile spanning medicine, psychology, and social sciences. Their work includes focus areas such as musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, suicide and self-harm studies, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, motivation and self-concept in sports, behavioral health and interventions, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, and family support in illness.

The scientist has contributed to various academic outlets including:

  • Psychology and Health (2 publications)
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (1 publication)
  • Patient Education and Counseling (1 publication)
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (1 publication)
  • International Journal of Prison Health (1 publication)

Recent peer-reviewed publications authored or co-authored by this researcher include:

  • Understanding suicidal ideation and behaviour in individuals with chronic pain: a review of the role of novel transdiagnostic psychological factors, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • How do peer support interventions for the self-management of chronic pain, support basic psychological needs? A systematic review and framework synthesis using self-determination theory, 2022, Patient Education and Counseling
  • Understanding the psychological and social influences on office workers taking breaks; a thematic analysis, 2020, Psychology and Health
  • Supporting and sustaining care at home: Experiences of adult daughters who support a parent with dementia to remain in their own home, 2021, Health & Social Care in the Community
  • Understanding weight gain in female prisoners, 2024, International Journal of Prison Health

Karen Rodham has published a book titled Self-Management for Persistent Pain: The Blame, Shame and Inflame Game? in 2020, through the University of Chichester, which has been cited in relevant literature.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with this researcher include:

  • Jennifer Taylor (3 joint publications)
  • Jeff Gavin (2 joint publications)
  • Olivia J Kirtley (1 joint publication)
  • Catherine Crane (1 joint publication)
  • Nicola Stenberg (1 joint publication)

Their work is mainly situated in the following fields and subfields:

  • Main fields of study: Medicine, Psychology, Social Sciences
  • Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Deliberate self harm in adolescents: self report survey in schools in England

    Keith E. Hawton;Karen Rodham;Emma Evans;Rosamund Weatherall

  • The prevalence of suicidal phenomena in adolescents: A systematic review of population-based studies

    Emma Evans;Keith Hawton;Karen Rodham;Jonathan Deeks

  • Factors associated with suicidal phenomena in adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies.

    Emma Evans;Keith Hawton;Karen Rodham

  • Reasons for deliberate self-harm: comparison of self-poisoners and self-cutters in a community sample of adolescents.

    Karen Rodham;Keith Hawton;Emma Evans

  • In what ways are adolescents who engage in self-harm or experience thoughts of self-harm different in terms of help-seeking, communication and coping strategies?

    Emma Evans;Keith Hawton;Karen Rodham

  • By Their Own Young Hand: Deliberate Self-harm and Suicidal Ideas in Adolescents

    Keith Hawton;Karen Rodham;Emma Evans

  • The Presentation of “Pro-Anorexia” in Online Group Interactions

    Jeff Gavin;Karen Rodham;Helen Poyer

  • Suicidal phenomena and abuse in adolescents: a review of epidemiological studies.

    Emma Evans;Keith Hawton;Karen Rodham

  • The Ethics of Using the Internet to Collect Qualitative Research Data

    Karen Rodham;Jeff Gavin

  • Exploring analytical trustworthiness and the process of reaching consensus in interpretative phenomenological analysis: lost in transcription

    Karen Rodham;Fiona Fox;Fiona Fox;Natasha Doran

  • Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England

    Natasha J Doran;Fiona E Fox;Karen Rodham;Gordon J Taylor

  • Epidemiology and Phenomenology of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

    Karen Rodham;Keith Hawton

  • Investigating the “Self” in Deliberate Self-Harm

    Joanna Adams;Karen Rodham;Jeff Gavin

  • Ethnic and gender differences in drinking, smoking and drug taking among adolescents in England: a self-report school-based survey of 15 and 16 year olds.

    Karen Rodham;Keith E. Hawton;Emma Evans;Rosamund Weatherall

  • I hear, I listen and I care: a qualitative investigation into the function of a self-harm message board

    Karen Rodham;Jeff Gavin;Meriel Miles

  • The Ouch! Factor: Problems in Conducting Sensitive Research

    A. Alty;K. Rodham

  • Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review

    Faith Martin;Laura Camfield;Karen Rodham;Petra Kliempt

  • Doing weight: Pro-ana and recovery identities in cyberspace

    Sarah Christine Riley;Karen Rodham;Jeffrey Gavin

  • Distinguishing between subgroups of adolescents who self-harm.

    Emily Hargus;Keith E. Hawton;Karen Rodham

  • Insights into Pain: A Review of Qualitative Research

    Mike Osborn;Karen Rodham

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Hawton
Keith Hawton University of Oxford
John R. Kirwan
John R. Kirwan University of Bristol
Neil S. Coulson
Neil S. Coulson University of Nottingham
Edmund Keogh
Edmund Keogh University of Bath
David R. Blake
David R. Blake University of Bath
Stephen P. Lewis
Stephen P. Lewis University of Guelph
Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson
Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Paul Stallard
Paul Stallard University of Bath
Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol
Susan M. Ring
Susan M. Ring University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse careers. Many students choose online degree programs for their flexibility and affordability. For those interested in counseling, it’s crucial to select programs with cacrep accreditation, which ensures your degree meets recognized professional standards.

Aspiring marriage and family therapists should explore mft masters programs that are both affordable and reputable. Those looking to focus on psychology can find a range of most affordable online schools for psychology—perfect for individuals seeking cost-effective paths to licensure.

If social work is your passion, consider msw programs with high acceptance rate to increase your chances of admission while still receiving a quality education. Each pathway offers unique opportunities to make a meaningful impact in your community through accessible and flexible online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Rodham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles