World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 68 849 739 3 3 276 19670

Ella Arensman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ella Arensman between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ella Arensman published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2020. 28 of the 315 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2020. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 13 publications
1995 2025

315 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ella Arensman: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 5
2002 5
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 8
2007 5
2008 10
2009 9
2010 11
2011 9
2012 6
2013 14
2014 18
2015 13
2016 16
2017 15
2018 11
2019 19
2020 26
2021 25
2022 24
2023 21
2024 15
2025 13
Total 315
Download as CSV

Ella Arensman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ella Arensman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 276 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 276
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ella Arensman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ella Arensman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49 68
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Ireland Leader Award

Overview

Ella Arensman is affiliated with University College Cork in Ireland and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on mental health, with a strong emphasis on suicide and self-harm studies. Their work reflects significant engagement in the fields of psychology and health professions, addressing complex issues at the intersection of mental health treatment, public health emergencies, and societal factors.

Arensman's main areas of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

Their research further delves into more specialized subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Social Psychology
  • Health
  • Emergency Medicine

The scientist's published work frequently addresses topics like:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout

Ella Arensman has several recent papers notable for their focus on suicide risk dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health challenges, including:

  • "Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020) published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Suicide trends in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis of preliminary data from 21 countries" (2021) in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Suicide numbers during the first 9-15 months of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with pre-existing trends: An interrupted time series analysis in 33 countries" (2022) in EClinicalMedicine
  • "The Impact of Infectious Disease-Related Public Health Emergencies on Suicide, Suicidal Behavior, and Suicidal Thoughts" (2020) in Crisis
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review" (2021) in F1000Research

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Paul Corcoran, Eve Griffin, Keith Hawton, David Gunnell, and Navneet Kapur, with whom they have collectively contributed to advancing knowledge in the understanding and prevention of suicidal behavior.

Ella Arensman's research outputs are often featured in journals and venues including:

  • Crisis
  • HRB Open Research
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review

    Gil Zalsman;Gil Zalsman;Keith Hawton;Danuta Wasserman;Kees van Heeringen

  • Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    David Gunnell;Louis Appleby;Ella Arensman;Keith Hawton

  • Suicide trends in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis of preliminary data from 21 countries.

    Jane Pirkis;Ann John;Sangsoo Shin;Marcos DelPozo-Banos

  • Deliberate self harm: systematic review of efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments in preventing repetition

    Keith E. Hawton;E. Arensman;E. Townsend;S. Bremner

  • Negative Life Events and Depression in Elderly Persons A Meta-Analysis

    Vivian Kraaij;Ella Arensman;Philip Spinhoven

  • Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for deliberate self harm

    Keith Ke Hawton;Ellen Townsend;Ella Arensman;David Gunnell

  • Suicide methods in Europe: a gender-specific analysis of countries participating in the “European Alliance Against Depression”

    A Värnik;Kairi Kolves;C M van der Feltz-Cornelis;A Marusic

  • Psychological characteristics, stressful life events and deliberate self-harm: findings from the Child & Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) Study.

    Nicola Madge;Keith E. Hawton;Elaine M. McMahon;Paul Corcoran

  • A cross-national study on gender differences in suicide intent

    Aislinné Freeman;Roland Mergl;Elisabeth Kohls;András Székely

  • Attempted and completed suicide in older subjects: results from the WHO/EURO multicentre study of suicidal behaviour

    Diego De Leo;Walter Padoani;Paolo Scocco;David Lie;David Lie

  • Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents

    Keith Hawton;Katrina G. Witt;Tatiana L. Taylor Salisbury;Ella Arensman

  • Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults

    Keith Hawton;Katrina G Witt;Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury;Ella Arensman

  • The Toll of Stalking The Relationship Between Features of Stalking and Psychopathology of Victims

    Eric Blaauw;Frans W. Winkel;Ella Arensman;Lorraine Sheridan

  • The efficacy of problem­solving treatments after deliberate self­harm: meta­ analysis of randomized controlled trials with respect to depression, hopelessness and improvement in problems

    E. Townsend;Keith E. Hawton;D. G. Altman;E. Arensman

  • Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Keith Hawton;Katrina G Witt;Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury;Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury;Ella Arensman

  • Cognitive–behavioural intervention for self-harm: randomised controlled trial

    Nadja Slee;Nadia Garnefski;Rien van der Leeden;Ella Arensman

  • What are reasons for the large gender differences in the lethality of suicidal acts? An epidemiological analysis in four European countries

    Roland Mergl;Nicole Koburger;Katherina Heinrichs;András Székely

  • Public attitudes toward depression and help-seeking in four European countries baseline survey prior to the OSPI-Europe intervention

    Evelien Coppens;Chantal Van Audenhove;Gert Scheerder;Ella Arensman

  • Increasing rates of self-harm among children, adolescents and young adults: a 10-year national registry study 2007–2016

    Eve Griffin;Elaine M. McMahon;Fiona McNicholas;Fiona McNicholas;Paul Corcoran

  • Relation between attempted suicide and suicide rates among young people in Europe.

    Keith E. Hawton;Ella Arensman;Danuta Wasserman;A. Hultén

  • The incidence and repetition of hospital-treated deliberate self harm: findings from the world's first national registry.

    Ivan J. Perry;Paul Corcoran;Anthony P. Fitzgerald;Helen S. Keeley

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Corcoran
Paul Corcoran University College Cork
Ivan J. Perry
Ivan J. Perry University College Cork
Keith Hawton
Keith Hawton University of Oxford
Ulrich Hegerl
Ulrich Hegerl Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe
Diego De Leo
Diego De Leo Griffith University
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
Armin Schmidtke
Armin Schmidtke University of Würzburg
Airi Värnik
Airi Värnik Tallinn University
Roger T. Webb
Roger T. Webb University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The popularity of online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities has soared in recent years, offering flexible education pathways for working professionals and students alike. From social work to psychology, a variety of programs are now accessible from anywhere in the world.

For those interested in social work, there is a broad range of msw programs online, which prioritize affordability without sacrificing quality. Students seeking more rapid advancement can look into accelerated msw programs that help them enter the workforce sooner.

The need for qualified behavior analysts is also growing. Becoming certified starts with a suitable education, such as choosing a reputable bcba school online, which offers a cost-effective solution for aspiring professionals.

Those drawn to the field of psychology can opt for a fast track psychology degree online, accelerating their studies while balancing other commitments. These varied online degree options open doors to diverse career pathways in counseling, education, advocacy, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Ella Arensman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles