World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chantal Van Audenhove

Chantal Van Audenhove

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
6831
World Ranking
7308
National Ranking
103

Chantal Van Audenhove publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chantal Van Audenhove sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 376 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Chantal Van Audenhove D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chantal Van Audenhove sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chantal Van Audenhove is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has made contributions across several domains including health professions, medicine, and psychology. Their research output spans multiple topics related primarily to health and mental well-being, with a focus on clinical and occupational settings.

Their scholarly work incorporates main fields of study such as Health Professions (62 publications), Medicine (45 publications), and Psychology (29 publications). Within these areas, subfields of particular focus include General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

Main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health, psychology, and well-being

Several recent papers highlight the range and depth of their research:

  • "The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care" (2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • "Are family carers part of the care team providing end-of-life care? A qualitative interview study on the collaboration between family and professional carers" (2020, Palliative Medicine)
  • "Key dimensions of collaboration quality in mental health care service networks" (2020, Journal of Interprofessional Care)
  • "How can social workers be meaningfully involved in palliative care? A scoping review on the prerequisites and how they can be realised in practice" (2021, Palliative Care and Social Practice)
  • "Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention" (2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)

They have frequently published their research in several journals and venues, including:

  • International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (4 publications)
  • Patient Education and Counseling (4 publications)
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (3 publications)
  • Palliative Medicine (3 publications)
  • Radiotherapy and Oncology (3 publications)

The scientist's collaborative work involves repeated partnerships with several scholars, including:

  • Aline De Vleminck (13 co-authored publications)
  • Ella Arensman (12 co-authored publications)
  • Evelien Coppens (12 co-authored publications)
  • Lars de Winter (12 co-authored publications)
  • Caleb Leduc (11 co-authored publications)

Best Publications

  • Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey

    Antonio Lasalvia;Silvia Zoppei;Tine Van Bortel;Chiara Bonetto

  • Best practice elements of multilevel suicide prevention strategies: a review of systematic reviews

    Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis;Marco Sarchiapone;Vita Postuvan;Daniëlle Volker

  • Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all.

    Else Tambuyzer;Guido Pieters;Chantal Van Audenhove

  • What are reasons for the large gender differences in the lethality of suicidal acts? An epidemiological analysis in four European countries

    Roland Mergl;Nicole Koburger;Katherina Heinrichs;András Székely

  • The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey

    Tom Bourne;Laure Wynants;Mike Peters;Chantal Van Audenhove

  • Public attitudes toward depression and help-seeking in four European countries baseline survey prior to the OSPI-Europe intervention

    Evelien Coppens;Chantal Van Audenhove;Gert Scheerder;Ella Arensman

  • Barriers to advance care planning in cancer, heart failure and dementia patients: a focus group study on general practitioners' views and experiences.

    Aline De Vleminck;Koen Pardon;Kim Beernaert;Reginald Deschepper

  • The quality of the caregiving relationship in informal care for older adults with dementia and chronic psychiatric patients

    Nele Spruytte;Chantal Van Audenhove;Frans Lammertyn;Gerrit Storms

  • Optimizing Suicide Prevention Programs and Their Implementation in Europe (OSPI Europe): an evidence-based multi-level approach

    Ulrich Hegerl;Lisa Wittenburg;Ella Arensman;Chantal van Audenhove

  • The 'European Alliance Against Depression (EAAD)': A multifaceted, community-based action programme against depression and suicidality

    Ulrich Hegerl;Meike Wittmann;Ella Arensman;Chantal van Audenhove

  • Stress Reduction Through Psychoeducation A Meta- Analytic Review

    Tom Van Daele;Dirk Hermans;Chantal Van Audenhove;Omer Van den Bergh

  • Antidepressant Utilization and Suicide in Europe: An Ecological Multi-National Study

    Ricardo Gusmão;Sónia Quintão;David McDaid;Ella Arensman

  • The state of the art in European research on reducing social exclusion and stigma related to mental health: A systematic mapping of the literature

    S. Evans-Lacko;E. Courtin;A. Fiorillo;M. Knapp

  • Gender issues in suicide rates, trends and methods among youths aged 15-24 in 15 European countries

    Airi Värnik;Kairi Kõlves;Kairi Kõlves;Jüri Allik;Ella Arensman

  • Pharmacists' role in depression care: a survey of attitudes, current practices, and barriers.

    Gert Scheerder;Iris De Coster;Chantal Van Audenhove

  • Predictors of institutionalization of cognitively-impaired elderly cared for by their relatives.

    Nele Spruytte;Chantal Van Audenhove;Frans Lammertyn

  • Validity of suicide statistics in Europe in relation to undetermined deaths: developing the 2-20 benchmark

    Peeter Värnik;Merike Sisask;Airi Värnik;Ella Arensman

  • Is perceived patient involvement in mental health care associated with satisfaction and empowerment

    Else Tambuyzer;Chantal Van Audenhove

  • The determinants of informal caregivers' burden in the care of frail older persons: a dynamic and role-related perspective

    Unknown

  • The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care.

    John P. Hirdes;Coline van Everdingen;Jason Ferris;Manuel Franco-Martin

  • Effectiveness of community facilitator training in improving knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in relation to depression and suicidal behavior: results of the OSPI-Europe intervention in four European countries.

    Evelien Coppens;Chantal Van Audenhove;Samuel Iddi;Samuel Iddi;Ella Arensman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ella Arensman
Ella Arensman University College Cork
Ulrich Hegerl
Ulrich Hegerl Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe
Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Jan De Maeseneer
Jan De Maeseneer Ghent University
Guido Pieters
Guido Pieters KU Leuven
Luc Deliens
Luc Deliens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Marc De Hert
Marc De Hert KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA unlocks a variety of online programs and career pathways. Many students choose to become mental health counselors, a field with growing demand and meaningful opportunities to make a difference.

Education and certification requirements differ by region. For example, the Chandler mental health counselor education requirements emphasize graduate-level study, clinical experience, and state licensing. Similarly, reviewing the Charlotte mental health counselor education requirements can help you understand local prerequisites, especially regarding supervision and exam criteria.

Certification plays a crucial role as well. The Chesapeake mental health counselor certification requirements outline steps such as background checks and supervised hours, highlighting the importance of ethical practice and practical training. In large urban areas, like Chicago, the mental health counselor requirements in Chicago provide a helpful perspective on degree recognition and career prospects.

Exploring these requirements will help you select the right online degree and prepare for a successful career in mental health counseling, no matter where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Chantal Van Audenhove

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles