World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Xiao-Yuan Jing

Xiao-Yuan Jing

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 46 6884 6682 920 914 286 7952

Xiao-Yuan Jing publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xiao-Yuan Jing between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xiao-Yuan Jing published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2020. 43 of the 390 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2020. 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 43 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 40 publications 2026: 3 publications
2003 2026

390 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xiao-Yuan Jing: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 5
2004 2
2005 2
2006 17
2007 2
2008 4
2009 6
2010 8
2011 13
2012 15
2013 6
2014 6
2015 10
2016 26
2017 25
2018 30
2019 29
2020 43
2021 22
2022 25
2023 28
2024 23
2025 40
2026 3
Total 390
Download as CSV

Xiao-Yuan Jing publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiao-Yuan Jing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 286 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 286
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Xiao-Yuan Jing D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiao-Yuan Jing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 46
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Xiao-Yuan Jing is affiliated with Wuhan University in China and has contributed extensively to research in the field of computer science, with a focus on areas such as computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, and information systems. Their work spans multiple subfields including software and biomedical engineering.

The scientist has published prominently in venues that include:

  • Pattern Recognition
  • Neurocomputing
  • IEEE Access
  • Knowledge-Based Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators include Fei Wu, Yimu Ji, Changhui Hu, Ziyun Cai, and Xiaoke Zhu, reflecting a pattern of sustained joint research efforts.

Some of the main topics addressed in their research are:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Face and Expression Recognition

Selected recent papers include:

  • DF-GAN: A Simple and Effective Baseline for Text-to-Image Synthesis (2022), presented at the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Semi-Supervised Multi-View Deep Discriminant Representation Learning (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Modality-specific and shared generative adversarial network for cross-modal retrieval (2020), featured in Pattern Recognition
  • Adaptive deformable convolutional network (2020), published in Neurocomputing
  • Semi-supervised multi-view graph convolutional networks with application to webpage classification (2022), appearing in Information Sciences

The work of Xiao-Yuan Jing reflects a broad engagement with technological and methodological challenges in computer science, particularly in leveraging machine learning techniques across multiple modalities and applications. Their research output contributes to foundational and applied studies within software engineering, artificial intelligence, and computer vision domains.

Best Publications

  • DF-GAN: A Simple and Effective Baseline for Text-to-Image Synthesis

    Unknown

  • A face and palmprint recognition approach based on discriminant DCT feature extraction

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;D. Zhang

  • Super-resolution Person re-identification with semi-coupled low-rank discriminant dictionary learning

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xiaoke Zhu;Fei Wu;Xinge You

  • Progress on approaches to software defect prediction

    Zhiqiang Li;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xiaoke Zhu;Xiaoke Zhu

  • Dictionary learning based software defect prediction

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;Shi Ying;Zhi-Wu Zhang;Shan-Shan Wu

  • Heterogeneous cross-company defect prediction by unified metric representation and CCA-based transfer learning

    Xiaoyuan Jing;Fei Wu;Xiwei Dong;Fumin Qi

  • Face and palmprint pixel level fusion and Kernel DCV-RBF classifier for small sample biometric recognition

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;Yong-Fang Yao;David Zhang;Jing-Yu Yang

  • An Improved SDA Based Defect Prediction Framework for Both Within-Project and Cross-Project Class-Imbalance Problems

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;Fei Wu;Xiwei Dong;Baowen Xu

  • Letters: Face and palmprint feature level fusion for single sample biometrics recognition

    Yong-Fang Yao;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Hau-San Wong

  • Semi-Supervised Multi-View Deep Discriminant Representation Learning

    Xiaodong Jia;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xiaoke Zhu;Songcan Chen

  • Video-Based Person Re-Identification by Simultaneously Learning Intra-Video and Inter-Video Distance Metrics

    Xiaoke Zhu;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xinge You;Xinyu Zhang

  • Multi-view low-rank dictionary learning for image classification

    Fei Wu;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xinge You;Dong Yue

  • Multiple kernel ensemble learning for software defect prediction

    Tiejian Wang;Zhiwu Zhang;Xiaoyuan Jing;Liqiang Zhang

  • Cross-Project and Within-Project Semisupervised Software Defect Prediction: A Unified Approach

    Fei Wu;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Ying Sun;Jing Sun

  • Rapid and brief communication: Face recognition based on 2D Fisherface approach

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;Hau-San Wong;David Zhang

  • Label propagation based semi-supervised learning for software defect prediction

    Zhi-Wu Zhang;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Tie-Jian Wang

  • Multiset Feature Learning for Highly Imbalanced Data Classification

    Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xinyu Zhang;Xiaoke Zhu;Fei Wu

  • Cost-sensitive transfer kernel canonical correlation analysis for heterogeneous defect prediction

    Zhiqiang Li;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Fei Wu;Xiaoke Zhu;Xiaoke Zhu

  • Learning robust and discriminative low-rank representations for face recognition with occlusion

    Guangwei Gao;Jian Yang;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Fumin Shen

  • DF-GAN: Deep Fusion Generative Adversarial Networks for Text-to-Image Synthesis

    Ming Tao;Hao Tang;Songsong Wu;Nicu Sebe

  • Video-based person re-identification by simultaneously learning intra-video and inter-video distance metrics

    Xiaoke Zhu;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Fei Wu;Hui Feng

  • Principle Component Analysis

    David Zhang;Xiao-Yuan Jing;Jian Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Fei Wu
Fei Wu Zhejiang University
David Zhang
David Zhang Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Jingyu Yang
Jingyu Yang Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Sheng Li
Sheng Li University of Virginia
Jian Yang
Jian Yang University of Birmingham
Xinge You
Xinge You Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Dong Yue
Dong Yue Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Baowen Xu
Baowen Xu Nanjing University
Hongyu Zhang
Hongyu Zhang Chongqing University
C. L. Philip Chen
C. L. Philip Chen South China University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those pursuing Computer Science in the USA, online education offers a flexible gateway to broaden your skill set and career prospects. Affordable and reputable online programs make it easier to specialize or expand your expertise from anywhere in the world.

Professionals looking to advance into high-level management may consider emba programs. These degrees help develop leadership and strategic decision-making abilities applicable to technology and business settings alike.

Tech-driven fields like data management, research, and information science are well-served by mlis programs. Such qualifications open doors to digital archiving, informatics, and library systems careers, intersecting closely with emerging trends in computer science.

Many aspiring specialists and professionals also explore online affordable master's programs. With a range of computer science-focused concentrations available, these programs are ideal for boosting both technical and soft skills in today’s job market.

For those with an interest in leadership roles, consider a doctorate organizational leadership online program. This advanced degree can help propel your career in both academic and executive pathways within technology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Xiao-Yuan Jing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles