World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan De Maeseneer

Jan De Maeseneer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4065 3753 46 45 312 10504

Jan De Maeseneer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan De Maeseneer between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan De Maeseneer published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2010. 2 of the 387 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2010. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 18 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1981 2025

387 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan De Maeseneer: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 5
1992 0
1993 1
1994 18
1995 8
1996 7
1997 3
1998 6
1999 2
2000 9
2001 13
2002 7
2003 15
2004 11
2005 12
2006 14
2007 12
2008 20
2009 11
2010 33
2011 21
2012 19
2013 22
2014 24
2015 13
2016 6
2017 10
2018 9
2019 9
2020 21
2021 7
2022 6
2023 8
2024 0
2025 2
Total 387
Download as CSV

Jan De Maeseneer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan De Maeseneer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 304–313 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 312 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95 312
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan De Maeseneer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan De Maeseneer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan De Maeseneer is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a notable focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medical Services, Epidemiology, and Finance.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics, prominently including:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Jan De Maeseneer's recent publications illustrate these interests. These include:

  • "Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations", 2020, The Lancet
  • "The best person (or machine) for the job: Rethinking task shifting in healthcare", 2020, Health Policy
  • "Strengthening vaccination programmes and health systems in the European Union: A framework for action", 2020, Health Policy
  • "Universal health coverage and primary health care: the 30 by 2030 campaign", 2020, Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • "A scoping review on family medicine in sub-Saharan Africa: practice, positioning and impact in African health care systems", 2020, Human Resources for Health

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Jan De Maeseneer include:

  • Dionne Kringos (7 publications)
  • Luigi Siciliani (7 publications)
  • Martin McKee (7 publications)
  • Pedro Pita Barros (6 publications)
  • Sara Willems (5 publications)

Jan De Maeseneer's works have appeared repeatedly in various academic venues. These frequent publication outlets include:

  • Health Policy (3 publications)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 publications)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Integrated Care (2 publications)
  • The Lancet (1 publication)

In addition to research articles, Jan De Maeseneer has contributed to book publications. Notably, a book titled "Skill-mix Innovation, Effectiveness and Implementation" was published by Cambridge University Press in 2022, accumulating citations.

Best Publications

  • Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern

    Norbert H Lameire;Arvind Bagga;Dinna Cruz;Jan De Maeseneer

  • The primary health-care system in China

    Xi Li;Jiapeng Lu;Shuang Hu;KK Cheng;KK Cheng

  • Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations.

    Xi Li;Harlan M. Krumholz;Winnie Yip;Kar Keung Cheng;Kar Keung Cheng

  • Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries

    Myriam Deveugele;Anselm Derese;Atie van den Brink-Muinen;Jozien Bensing

  • Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective

    Filip Lievens;Pol Coetsier;Filip De Fruyt;Jan De Maeseneer

  • Teaching communication skills to medical students, a challenge in the curriculum?

    Myriam Deveugele;Anselme Derese;Stéphanie De Maesschalck;Sara Willems

  • The need for research in primary care.

    Jan M De Maeseneer;Mieke L van Driel;Larry A Green;Chris van Weel

  • QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care

    Willemijn L A Schäfer;W G Wienke Boerma;Dionne S Kringos;Jan De Maeseneer

  • Provider continuity in family medicine: does it make a difference for total health care costs?

    Jan M. De Maeseneer;Lutgarde De Prins;Christiane Gosset;Jozef Heyerick

  • Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?

    Merlin L Willcox;Wim Peersman;Pierre Daou;Chiaka Diakité

  • How to govern the digital transformation of health services

    Walter Ricciardi;Pedro Pita Barros;Aleš Bourek;Werner Brouwer

  • Are Sore Throat Patients Who Hope for Antibiotics Actually Asking for Pain Relief

    Mieke L Van Driel;An I De Sutter;Myriam Deveugele;Wim Peersman

  • Primary health care and the Sustainable Development Goals

    Luisa M Pettigrew;Jan De Maeseneer;Maria-Inez Padula Anderson;Akye Essuman

  • The importance of socio-economic status and individual characteristics on the prevalence of head lice in schoolchildren

    Sara Willems;Hilde Lapeere;Nele Haedens;Inge Pasteels

  • Strengthening primary care: addressing the disparity between vertical and horizontal investment.

    Jan De Maeseneer;Chris van Weel;David Egilman;Khaya Mfenyana

  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on physical activity and eating habits in persons with severe mental disorders: A systematic review

    Nick Verhaeghe;Jan De Maeseneer;Lea Maes;Cornelis Van Heeringen

  • James Mackenzie Lecture 2011: multimorbidity, goal-oriented care, and equity

    Jan De Maeseneer;Pauline Boeckxstaens

  • Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort

    Mieke L. van Driel;Mieke L. van Driel;An Im De Sutter;Jan De Maeseneer;Thierry Christiaens

  • From Alma-Ata to Almaty: a new start for primary health care

    Salman Rawaf;Jan De Maeseneer;Barbara Starfield

  • Antibiotic prescribing in acute infections of the nose or sinuses: a matter of personal habit?

    An I De Sutter;Marc J De Meyere;Jan M De Maeseneer;Wim P Peersman

  • Tackling NCDs: a different approach is needed

    Jan De Maeseneer;Richard G Roberts;Marcelo Demarzo;Iona Heath

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris van Weel
Chris van Weel Radboud University
Luigi Siciliani
Luigi Siciliani University of York
Lea Maes
Lea Maes Ghent University
Pedro Pita Barros
Pedro Pita Barros Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Werner B. F. Brouwer
Werner B. F. Brouwer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nelson K. Sewankambo
Nelson K. Sewankambo Rakai Health Sciences Program
Dirk De Bacquer
Dirk De Bacquer Ghent University
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Martin Valcke
Martin Valcke Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to flexible, affordable, and career-focused learning. Students seeking advanced qualifications may consider online masters programs, which offer convenience and the potential to accelerate career growth. For working adults or career switchers, accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults are designed to fast-track undergraduate study and quickly gain valuable credentials.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Fortunately, there are cheapest msw programs online, making it possible to enter the high-demand field of social work without heavy financial burdens. Additionally, those pursuing specialized roles in applied behavior analysis can benefit from the bcba certification online to advance their professional standings and serve diverse communities.

With a wide range of accredited online degrees and certifications, students can personalize their education to match their career ambitions, pace, and budget—turning passion for social sciences and humanities into rewarding job opportunities nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Jan De Maeseneer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles