World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan De Maeseneer

Jan De Maeseneer

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
10504
World Ranking
4065
National Ranking
46

Jan De Maeseneer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan De Maeseneer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 312 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jan De Maeseneer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan De Maeseneer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan De Maeseneer is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a notable focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medical Services, Epidemiology, and Finance.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics, prominently including:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Jan De Maeseneer's recent publications illustrate these interests. These include:

  • "Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations", 2020, The Lancet
  • "The best person (or machine) for the job: Rethinking task shifting in healthcare", 2020, Health Policy
  • "Strengthening vaccination programmes and health systems in the European Union: A framework for action", 2020, Health Policy
  • "Universal health coverage and primary health care: the 30 by 2030 campaign", 2020, Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • "A scoping review on family medicine in sub-Saharan Africa: practice, positioning and impact in African health care systems", 2020, Human Resources for Health

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Jan De Maeseneer include:

  • Dionne Kringos (7 publications)
  • Luigi Siciliani (7 publications)
  • Martin McKee (7 publications)
  • Pedro Pita Barros (6 publications)
  • Sara Willems (5 publications)

Jan De Maeseneer's works have appeared repeatedly in various academic venues. These frequent publication outlets include:

  • Health Policy (3 publications)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 publications)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Integrated Care (2 publications)
  • The Lancet (1 publication)

In addition to research articles, Jan De Maeseneer has contributed to book publications. Notably, a book titled "Skill-mix Innovation, Effectiveness and Implementation" was published by Cambridge University Press in 2022, accumulating citations.

Best Publications

  • Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern

    Norbert H Lameire;Arvind Bagga;Dinna Cruz;Jan De Maeseneer

  • The primary health-care system in China

    Xi Li;Jiapeng Lu;Shuang Hu;KK Cheng;KK Cheng

  • Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations.

    Xi Li;Harlan M. Krumholz;Winnie Yip;Kar Keung Cheng;Kar Keung Cheng

  • Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries

    Myriam Deveugele;Anselm Derese;Atie van den Brink-Muinen;Jozien Bensing

  • Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective

    Filip Lievens;Pol Coetsier;Filip De Fruyt;Jan De Maeseneer

  • Teaching communication skills to medical students, a challenge in the curriculum?

    Myriam Deveugele;Anselme Derese;Stéphanie De Maesschalck;Sara Willems

  • The need for research in primary care.

    Jan M De Maeseneer;Mieke L van Driel;Larry A Green;Chris van Weel

  • QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care

    Willemijn L A Schäfer;W G Wienke Boerma;Dionne S Kringos;Jan De Maeseneer

  • Provider continuity in family medicine: does it make a difference for total health care costs?

    Jan M. De Maeseneer;Lutgarde De Prins;Christiane Gosset;Jozef Heyerick

  • Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?

    Merlin L Willcox;Wim Peersman;Pierre Daou;Chiaka Diakité

  • How to govern the digital transformation of health services

    Walter Ricciardi;Pedro Pita Barros;Aleš Bourek;Werner Brouwer

  • Are Sore Throat Patients Who Hope for Antibiotics Actually Asking for Pain Relief

    Mieke L Van Driel;An I De Sutter;Myriam Deveugele;Wim Peersman

  • Primary health care and the Sustainable Development Goals

    Luisa M Pettigrew;Jan De Maeseneer;Maria-Inez Padula Anderson;Akye Essuman

  • The importance of socio-economic status and individual characteristics on the prevalence of head lice in schoolchildren

    Sara Willems;Hilde Lapeere;Nele Haedens;Inge Pasteels

  • Strengthening primary care: addressing the disparity between vertical and horizontal investment.

    Jan De Maeseneer;Chris van Weel;David Egilman;Khaya Mfenyana

  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on physical activity and eating habits in persons with severe mental disorders: A systematic review

    Nick Verhaeghe;Jan De Maeseneer;Lea Maes;Cornelis Van Heeringen

  • James Mackenzie Lecture 2011: multimorbidity, goal-oriented care, and equity

    Jan De Maeseneer;Pauline Boeckxstaens

  • Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort

    Mieke L. van Driel;Mieke L. van Driel;An Im De Sutter;Jan De Maeseneer;Thierry Christiaens

  • From Alma-Ata to Almaty: a new start for primary health care

    Salman Rawaf;Jan De Maeseneer;Barbara Starfield

  • Antibiotic prescribing in acute infections of the nose or sinuses: a matter of personal habit?

    An I De Sutter;Marc J De Meyere;Jan M De Maeseneer;Wim P Peersman

  • Tackling NCDs: a different approach is needed

    Jan De Maeseneer;Richard G Roberts;Marcelo Demarzo;Iona Heath

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris van Weel
Chris van Weel Radboud University
Luigi Siciliani
Luigi Siciliani University of York
Lea Maes
Lea Maes Ghent University
Pedro Pita Barros
Pedro Pita Barros Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Werner B. F. Brouwer
Werner B. F. Brouwer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Nelson K. Sewankambo
Nelson K. Sewankambo Rakai Health Sciences Program
Dirk De Bacquer
Dirk De Bacquer Ghent University
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Martin Valcke
Martin Valcke Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to flexible, affordable, and career-focused learning. Students seeking advanced qualifications may consider online masters programs, which offer convenience and the potential to accelerate career growth. For working adults or career switchers, accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults are designed to fast-track undergraduate study and quickly gain valuable credentials.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Fortunately, there are cheapest msw programs online, making it possible to enter the high-demand field of social work without heavy financial burdens. Additionally, those pursuing specialized roles in applied behavior analysis can benefit from the bcba certification online to advance their professional standings and serve diverse communities.

With a wide range of accredited online degrees and certifications, students can personalize their education to match their career ambitions, pace, and budget—turning passion for social sciences and humanities into rewarding job opportunities nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Jan De Maeseneer

Trending Scientists