World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
9427
World Ranking
2960
National Ranking
164

William Hogg publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Hogg sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 217 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

William Hogg D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Hogg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Hogg is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on health professions and medicine, with a particular emphasis on general health professions, economics and econometrics, surgery, epidemiology, and organizational behavior and human resource management within healthcare contexts.

Their work spans several key topics including:

  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Frequent coauthors in Hogg's research include Sabrina T. Wong, Sharon Johnston, Fred Burge, Ruth Martin-Misener, and Walter P. Wodchis.

They have contributed to a variety of publication venues, with multiple works published in Canadian Family Physician. Other publication venues include BJGP Open, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Journal of Medical Internet Research, and Healthcare Policy.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by William Hogg include:

  • "COVID-19 and primary care in six countries" (2020), published in BJGP Open
  • "Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study" (2020), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Primary care practice characteristics associated with team functioning in primary care settings in Canada: A practice-based cross-sectional survey" (2022), published in Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • "Comparing the Attainment of the Patient's Medical Home Model across Regions in Three Canadian Provinces: A Cross-Sectional Study" (2021), published in Healthcare Policy
  • "Priority measures for publicly reporting primary care performance: Results of public engagement through deliberative dialogues in 3 Canadian provinces" (2020), published in Health Expectations

Best Publications

  • The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: a QUALICOPC study

    Ashley E. Thompson;Yvonne Anisimowicz;Baukje Miedema;William Hogg

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings

    N. Bruce Baskerville;Clare Liddy;William Hogg

  • High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Cause-Specific Mortality in Individuals Without Previous Cardiovascular Conditions: The CANHEART Study.

    Dennis T. Ko;David A. Alter;Helen Guo;Maria Koh

  • Managing Chronic Disease in Ontario Primary Care: The Impact of Organizational Factors

    Grant Mervyn Russell;Simone Dahrouge;William Hogg;Robert Geneau

  • Improving cardiovascular health at population level: 39 community cluster randomised trial of Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP)

    Janusz Kaczorowski;Larry W Chambers;Lisa Dolovich;J Michael Paterson

  • Physical activity counseling in primary care: who has and who should be counseling?

    Heather Tulloch;Michelle Fortier;William Hogg

  • A cross-sectional, population-based study measuring comorbidity among people living with HIV in Ontario.

    Claire E Kendall;Jenna Wong;Monica Taljaard;Monica Taljaard;Richard H Glazier

  • Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain.

    William Hogg;Margo Rowan;Grant Mervyn Russell;Robert Geneau

  • Knowledge translation and indigenous knowledge.

    Janet Smylie;Carmel Mary Martin;Nili Kaplan-Myrth;Leah Steele

  • Primary care (PC) and primary health care (PHC). What is the difference

    Laura K. Muldoon;William E. Hogg;Miriam Levitt

  • Detection of chronic kidney disease with laboratory reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate and an educational program.

    Ayub Akbari;Peter J. Swedko;Heather D. Clark;William Hogg

  • Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care

    Jacques Lemelin;William Hogg;Neill Baskerville

  • COVID-19 and primary care in six countries.

    Patricia Huston;John Campbell;Grant Russell;Grant Russell;Felicity Goodyear-Smith

  • Randomized controlled trial of Anticipatory and Preventive multidisciplinary Team Care For complex patients in a community-based primary care setting

    William Hogg;Jacques Lemelin;Simone Dahrouge;Clare Liddy

  • Integrating pharmacists into family practice teams: physicians' perspectives on collaborative care.

    Kevin Pottie;Barbara Farrell;Susan Haydt;Lisa Dolovich;Lisa Dolovich

  • A Comprehensive Assessment of Family Physician Gender and Quality of Care: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Ontario, Canada.

    Simone Dahrouge;Emily Seale;William Hogg;Grant Russell

  • Impact of integrating a physical activity counsellor into the primary health care team: physical activity and health outcomes of the Physical Activity Counselling randomized controlled trial.

    Michelle S. Fortier;William Hogg;Tracey L. O’Sullivan;Christopher Blanchard

  • Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study

    Clare Liddy;Joanne J. Dusseault;Simone Dahrouge;William Hogg

  • Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries.

    Mark Fort Harris;Jenny Rose Advocat;Benjamin Crabtree;Jean-Frederic Levesque

  • Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care

    Marie-Dominique Beaulieu;Jeannie Haggerty;Pierre Tousignant;Janet Barnsley

  • Explaining physical activity levels from a self-efficacy perspective: the physical activity counseling trial.

    Chris M. Blanchard;Michelle Fortier;Shane Sweet;Tracey O’Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

Sabrina T. Wong
Sabrina T. Wong University of British Columbia
Kevin Pottie
Kevin Pottie University of Ottawa
Richard H. Glazier
Richard H. Glazier University of Toronto
Jack V. Tu
Jack V. Tu University of Toronto
Chris M. Blanchard
Chris M. Blanchard Dalhousie University
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jeremy M. Grimshaw Ottawa Hospital
Benjamin F. Crabtree
Benjamin F. Crabtree Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane McMaster University
Julia Abelson
Julia Abelson McMaster University
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities have a wealth of online degree options to explore. Graduates can launch or advance careers in counseling, education, psychology, mental health, and beyond—often without relocating or interrupting their work.

For those aiming for clinical practice with a focus on psychology, the best online psyd programs offer pathways to a doctorate and preparation for licensure. Alternatively, if you have a passion for family and relationship therapy, the best online mft programs provide specialized options—some with flexible, accelerated formats.

Affordability and efficiency are also key considerations. Prospective students will find a range of online masters psychology degrees tailored to various budgets and career goals. For educators and those pursuing leadership positions within academic settings, the fastest online edd programs can help you earn your degree in less time.

With today’s online programs, you can find a credential that matches your schedule, financial needs, and professional aspirations—no matter where you are.

Best Scientists Citing William Hogg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles