World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
28706
World Ranking
10578
National Ranking
5441

Richard A. Berger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Berger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 397 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard A. Berger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Berger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Berger is affiliated with Rush University Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple aspects of scientific computing, materials science, and computational methods applied to physical and biological systems.

Berger's recent publications cover topics related to simulation tools, computational workflows, and physical phenomena. Notable papers include:

  • "LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales" (2021) published in Computer Physics Communications
  • "Singularity-EOS: Performance Portable Equations of State and Mixed Cell Closures" (2024) published in The Journal of Open Source Software
  • "AlphaFold2 Workflow Optimization for High Throughput Predictions in HPC Environment" (2022) published in Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing
  • "Contact line friction of bubbles" (2025) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "LAMMPS: A Case Study For Applying Modern Software Engineering to an Established Research Software Package" (2025) published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors working with Berger have included:

  • Axel Kohlmeyer
  • Aidan P. Thompson
  • Hasan Metin Aktulga
  • Dan Bolintineanu
  • William M. Brown

Berger's work has appeared predominantly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Computer Physics Communications, The Journal of Open Source Software, and Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing.

The main areas of research involve several specialized subfields of study, including:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Structural Biology
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Key research topics tackled by Berger encompass:

  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Numerical Methods for Differential Equations
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management

The research output reflects an emphasis on integrating computational methods with experimental and theoretical materials science and structural biology. Berger's work addresses both the development and optimization of tools used in high-performance computing environments, as well as the application of these tools to complex systems modeling.

Best Publications

  • Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.

    Richard A. Berger;Lawrence S. Crossett;Joshua J. Jacobs;Harry E. Rubash

  • Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis.

    Richard A. Berger;Harry E. Rubash;Michael J. Seel;Warren H. Thompson

  • Corrosion at the Head-Neck Taper as a Cause for Adverse Local Tissue Reactions After Total Hip Arthroplasty

    H. John Cooper;Craig J. Della Valle;Richard A. Berger;Matthew Tetreault

  • Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

    Richard A. Berger;R. Michael Meneghini;Joshua J. Jacobs;Mitchell B. Sheinkop

  • Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

    Richard A Berger;Joshua J Jacobs;R Michael Meneghini;Craig Della Valle

  • Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty development, early results, and a critical analysis

    Daniel J. Berry;Richard A. Berger;John J. Callaghan;Lawrence D. Dorr

  • Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

    Richard A. Berger;David D. Nedeff;Regina M. Barden;Mitchell M. Sheinkop

  • An anatomic reconstruction of the distal radioulnar ligaments for posttraumatic distal radioulnar joint instability.

    Brian D. Adams;Richard A. Berger

  • Upregulation of prostaglandin E2 and interleukins in the central nervous system and peripheral tissue during and after surgery in humans

    Asokumar Buvanendran;Jeffrey S. Kroin;Richard A. Berger;Nadim J. Hallab

  • An Anatomic Study of the Stabilizing Ligaments of the Trapezium and Trapeziometacarpal Joint

    Paul C. Bettinger;Ronald L. Linscheid;Richard A. Berger;William P. Cooney

  • Anthranilamide arthropodicide treatment

    Richard Alan Berger;John Lindsey Flexner

  • Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

    Mark C. Miller;Richard A. Berger;Anthony J. Petrella;Alex Karmas

  • New dorsal capsulotomy for the surgical exposure of the wrist.

    Richard A. Berger;Allen T. Bishop;Paul C. Bettinger

  • The dorsopalmar stability of the distal radioulnar joint.

    Paul R. Stuart;Richard A. Berger;Ronald L. Linscheid;Kai Nan An

  • Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach.

    Richard A. Berger

  • Newer Anesthesia and Rehabilitation Protocols Enable Outpatient Hip Replacement in Selected Patients

    Richard A. Berger;Sheila A. Sanders;Elizabeth S. Thill;Scott M. Sporer

  • The Feasibility and Perioperative Complications of Outpatient Knee Arthroplasty

    Richard A. Berger;Sharat K. Kusuma;Sheila A. Sanders;Elizabeth S. Thill

  • Outpatient total knee arthroplasty with a minimally invasive technique.

    Richard A. Berger;Sheila Sanders;Tad Gerlinger;Craig Della Valle

  • Constraint and material properties of the subregions of the scapholunate interosseous ligament

    Richard A. Berger;Toshihiko Imeada;Lawrence Berglund;Kai Nan An

  • Relative contributions of the ulnar attachments of the triangular fibrocartilage complex to the dynamic stability of the distal radioulnar joint.

    Jan Ragnar Haugstvedt;Richard A. Berger;Toshiyasu Nakamura;Patricia Neale

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig J. Della Valle
Craig J. Della Valle Rush University Medical Center
Joshua J. Jacobs
Joshua J. Jacobs Rush University Medical Center
Jorge O. Galante
Jorge O. Galante Rush University Medical Center
Kai Nan An
Kai Nan An Mayo Clinic
John N. Krieger
John N. Krieger University of Washington
Judith A. Turner
Judith A. Turner University of Washington
J. Curtis Nickel
J. Curtis Nickel Queen's University
David A. Cook
David A. Cook Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in a healthcare career but unsure if medical school is right for you? There are several online degrees and alternative pathways to consider. For those with a bachelor’s in another field, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online offer accelerated options to become a nurse practitioner or clinical leader.

If you’re concerned about competitive admissions, explore the easiest nursing schools to get into. These institutions may offer more flexible requirements and rolling admissions, making it easier to launch your nursing career.

Not all medical roles require a clinical background. Medical billing and coding is a fast-growing, in-demand field you can enter with the right training. See our guide to the best medical billing and coding schools online for programs with accreditation and financial aid options.

Wondering about entrance exams? Good news: do all nursing schools require the teas explores nursing schools that don’t require the TEAS or HESI exams, offering more accessible pathways into nursing.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Berger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles