World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7562
World Ranking
7356
National Ranking
2622

Michael R. Poellot publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Poellot sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael R. Poellot D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Poellot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael R. Poellot is affiliated with the University of North Dakota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric sciences with contributions spanning Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Within these fields, Poellot works extensively on several subfields, notably:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Key topics of research covered by Poellot include:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Michael R. Poellot has published several papers, with recent notable works including:

  • "An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin" (2021) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Biomass burning aerosol as a modulator of the droplet number in the southeast Atlantic region" (2020) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Chasing Snowstorms: The Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) Campaign" (2022) in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Impact of the variability in vertical separation between biomass burning aerosols and marine stratocumulus on cloud microphysical properties over the Southeast Atlantic" (2021) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Factors affecting precipitation formation and precipitation susceptibility of marine stratocumulus with variable above- and below-cloud aerosol concentrations over the Southeast Atlantic" (2022) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Poellot frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Atmosphere
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of co-authors, such as:

  • Greg M. McFarquhar
  • David J. Delene
  • Jens Redemann
  • Siddhant Gupta
  • Joseph R. O'Brien

Best Publications

  • African Dust Aerosols as Atmospheric Ice Nuclei

    Paul J. DeMott;Kenneth Sassen;Michael R. Poellot;Darrel Baumgardner

  • Saharan dust storms and indirect aerosol effects on clouds: CRYSTAL-FACE results

    Kenneth Sassen;Paul J. DeMott;Joseph M. Prospero;Michael R. Poellot

  • The Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment.

    J. Verlinde;J. Y. Harrington;G. M. McFarquhar;V. T. Yannuzzi

  • Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud

    Stephen A. Klein;Renata B. McCoy;Hugh Morrison;Andrew S. Ackerman

  • Ice properties of single‐layer stratocumulus during the Mixed‐Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 1. Observations

    Greg M. McFarquhar;Gong Zhang;Michael R. Poellot;Gregory L. Kok

  • A general approach for deriving the properties of cirrus and stratiform ice cloud particles

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Sharon Lewis;Aaron Bansemer;Jean Iaquinta

  • Effective Ice Particle Densities Derived from Aircraft Data

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;A Aron Bansemer;Carl Schmitt;Cynthia Twohy

  • Ice properties of single-layer stratocumulus during the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 2. Model results

    Ann M. Fridlind;A. S. Ackerman;Greg Michael McFarquhar;G. Zhang

  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

    Jens Redemann;Robert Wood;Paquita Zuidema;Sarah J. Doherty

  • The Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E)

    M. P. Jensen;W. A. Petersen;Aaron R. Bansemer;N. Bharadwaj

  • The Olympic Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)

    Robert A. Houze;Lynn A. McMurdie;Walter A. Petersen;Mathew R. Schwaller

  • Ice nuclei characteristics from M‐PACE and their relation to ice formation in clouds

    Anthony J. Prenni;Paul J. Demott;David C. Rogers;Sonia M. Kreidenweis

  • Role of small ice crystals in radiative properties of cirrus: A case study, FIRE II, November 22, 1991

    W. Patrick Arnott;Ya Yi Dong;John Hallett;Michael R. Poellot

  • A GCM parameterization for bimodal size spectra and ice mass removal rates in mid-latitude cirrus clouds

    Dorothea Ivanova;David L Mitchell;W.Patrick Arnott;Michael Poellot

  • Chemical characteristics of ice residual nuclei in anvil cirrus clouds: evidence for homogeneous and heterogeneous ice formation

    Cynthia Twohy;M. R. Poellot

  • Comparison of Stratus Cloud Properties Deduced from Surface, GOES, and Aircraft Data during the March 2000 ARM Cloud IOP

    Xiquan Dong;Patrick Minnis;Gerald G. Mace;William L. Smith

  • Homogeneous Ice Nucleation in Subtropical and Tropical Convection and Its Influence on Cirrus Anvil Microphysics

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Larry M. Miloshevich;Carl Schmitt;Aaron Bansemer

  • Evidence for the Predominance of Mid-Tropospheric Aerosols as Subtropical Anvil Cloud Nuclei

    Ann M. Fridlind;Andrew S. Ackerman;Eric J. Jensen;Andrew J. Heymsfield

  • On retrieving the microphysical properties of cirrus clouds using the moments of the millimeter-wavelength Doppler spectrum

    Gerald G. Mace;Andrew J. Heymsfield;Michael R. Poellot

  • Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud: MIXED-PHASE MODEL COMPARISONS. I: SINGLE-LAYER CLOUD

    Stephen A. Klein;Renata B. McCoy;Hugh Morrison;Andrew S. Ackerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Greg M. McFarquhar
Greg M. McFarquhar University of Oklahoma
Andrew J. Heymsfield
Andrew J. Heymsfield National Center for Atmospheric Research
Kenneth Sassen
Kenneth Sassen University of Alaska Fairbanks
Gerald G. Mace
Gerald G. Mace University of Utah
Cynthia H. Twohy
Cynthia H. Twohy Northwest Research Associates
Ann M. Fridlind
Ann M. Fridlind Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Paul J. DeMott
Paul J. DeMott Colorado State University
Andrew S. Ackerman
Andrew S. Ackerman Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Aaron Bansemer
Aaron Bansemer National Center for Atmospheric Research
Patrick Minnis
Patrick Minnis Langley Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, expanding your expertise with related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. An online geology degree complements environmental studies by providing a deeper understanding of earth processes, mineral resources, and natural hazards.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly essential in environmental work for mapping and analyzing spatial data. Pursuing top gis degree programs online equips professionals to support conservation, urban planning, and disaster response efforts.

Policy and leadership roles within environmental sectors often require advanced training. A one year MPA program offers a fast-tracked path to hone public administration skills, which are vital for managing environmental programs and influencing policy decisions.

Lastly, understanding human societies and behaviors is crucial for effective environmental advocacy and community engagement. The best online bachelors in sociology programs provide insights into social systems, inequality, and cultural dynamics, all of which shape environmental outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Poellot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles