World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
7315
World Ranking
5608
National Ranking
2039

Aaron Bansemer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron Bansemer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Aaron Bansemer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron Bansemer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aaron Bansemer is affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Atmospheric Science as a subfield.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, including:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Bansemer has contributed to 37 publications in Earth and Planetary Sciences and 19 in Environmental Science. Their subfield involvement includes 31 publications in Atmospheric Science, 18 in Global and Planetary Change, 6 in Earth-Surface Processes, 6 in Aerospace Engineering, and 2 in Artificial Intelligence.

Frequent venues for their work include:

  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (6 publications)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (2 publications)
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2 publications)
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (2 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (2 publications)

Their recent papers reflect a focus on atmospheric processes related to precipitation, cloud physics, and secondary ice production. Notable publications include:

  • Contributions of the Liquid and Ice Phases to Global Surface Precipitation: Observations and Global Climate Modeling, 2020, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Evidence for Secondary Ice Production in Southern Ocean Maritime Boundary Layer Clouds, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • New Empirical Formulation for the Sublimational Breakup of Graupel and Dendritic Snow, 2021, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Survival of Snow in the Melting Layer: Relative Humidity Influence, 2021, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Dependencies of Four Mechanisms of Secondary Ice Production on Cloud-Top Temperature in a Continental Convective Storm, 2022, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Bansemer collaborates frequently with several researchers in their field, including:

  • Andrew J. Heymsfield
  • Vaughan T. J. Phillips
  • Sachin Patade
  • Deepak Waman
  • Akash Deshmukh

Best Publications

  • Shattering and Particle Interarrival Times Measured by Optical Array Probes in Ice Clouds

    P. R. Field;A. J. Heymsfield;A. Bansemer

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer;Paul R. Field;Stephen L. Durden

  • Snow Size Distribution Parameterization for Midlatitude and Tropical Ice Clouds

    Paul R. Field;Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer

  • Improvements in Shortwave Bulk Scattering and Absorption Models for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds

    Bryan A. Baum;Ping Yang;Andrew J. Heymsfield;Carl G. Schmitt

  • Ice Cloud Particle Size Distributions and Pressure-Dependent Terminal Velocities from In Situ Observations at Temperatures from 0° to −86°C

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Carl Schmitt;Aaron Bansemer

  • A general approach for deriving the properties of cirrus and stratiform ice cloud particles

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Sharon Lewis;Aaron Bansemer;Jean Iaquinta

  • Effective Ice Particle Densities Derived from Aircraft Data

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;A Aron Bansemer;Carl Schmitt;Cynthia Twohy

  • Saharan dust particles nucleate droplets in eastern Atlantic clouds

    Cynthia H. Twohy;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Trude Eidhammer;Edward V. Browell

  • Ice cloud single-scattering property models with the full phase matrix at wavelengths from 0.2 to 100 µm

    Bryan A. Baum;Ping Yang;Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer

  • The Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E)

    M. P. Jensen;W. A. Petersen;Aaron R. Bansemer;N. Bharadwaj

  • Improved Representation of Ice Particle Masses Based on Observations in Natural Clouds

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Carl Schmitt;Aaron Bansemer;Cynthia H. Twohy

  • On the importance of small ice crystals in tropical anvil cirrus

    E. J. Jensen;P. Lawson;B. Baker;B. Pilson

  • Microphysical Observations of Tropical Clouds

    Jeffrey L. Stith;James E. Dye;Aaron Bansemer;Andrew J. Heymsfield

  • Statistical properties of the normalized ice particle size distribution

    Julien Delanoë;Alain Protat;Jacques Testud;Dominique Bouniol

  • Processing of Ice Cloud In Situ Data Collected by Bulk Water, Scattering, and Imaging Probes: Fundamentals, Uncertainties, and Efforts toward Consistency

    Greg M. McFarquhar;Darrel Baumgardner;Aaron Bansemer;Steven J. Abel

  • Homogeneous Ice Nucleation in Subtropical and Tropical Convection and Its Influence on Cirrus Anvil Microphysics

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Larry M. Miloshevich;Carl Schmitt;Aaron Bansemer

  • Evidence for ice particles in the tropical stratosphere from in-situ measurements

    M. de Reus;M. de Reus;S. Borrmann;S. Borrmann;A. Bansemer;A. J. Heymsfield

  • Secondary Ice Production by Fragmentation of Freezing Drops: Formulation and Theory

    Vaughan T. J. Phillips;Sachin Patade;Julie Gutierrez;Aaron Bansemer

  • Contributions of the Liquid and Ice Phases to Global Surface Precipitation: Observations and Global Climate Modeling

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Carl Schmitt;Chih-Chieh-Jack Chen;Aaron Bansemer

  • Potential impacts from biological aerosols on ensembles of continental clouds simulated numerically

    Vaughan Phillips;C. Andronache;B. Christner;C. E. Morris

  • Evaluation of Ice Water Content Retrievals from Cloud Radar Reflectivity and Temperature Using a Large Airborne In Situ Microphysical Database

    Alain Protat;Julien Delanoë;Dominique Bouniol;A. Heymsfield

  • Refinements to Ice Particle Mass Dimensional and Terminal Velocity Relationships for Ice Clouds. Part I: Temperature Dependence

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer;Cynthia H. Twohy

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Heymsfield
Andrew J. Heymsfield National Center for Atmospheric Research
Cynthia H. Twohy
Cynthia H. Twohy Northwest Research Associates
Paul R. Field
Paul R. Field Met Office
Michael R. Poellot
Michael R. Poellot University of North Dakota
Vaughan T. J. Phillips
Vaughan T. J. Phillips Lund University
Gerald M. Heymsfield
Gerald M. Heymsfield Goddard Space Flight Center
Hugh Morrison
Hugh Morrison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Greg M. McFarquhar
Greg M. McFarquhar University of Oklahoma
Darrel Baumgardner
Darrel Baumgardner National Autonomous University of Mexico
Alexander V. Ryzhkov
Alexander V. Ryzhkov University of Oklahoma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career pathways that complement this field. For those seeking a broad yet manageable course load, exploring the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insights into options that balance rigor with flexibility.

Geosciences and geology are integral to understanding environmental processes. Many students opt for the best online geology degree programs that offer comprehensive training accessible remotely, ideal for those combining study with work or other commitments.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental data analysis and mapping. The best gis schools provide specialized online trainings to help students gain these in-demand technical skills.

For professionals interested in leadership and public administration aspects of environmental policy, a focused graduate degree such as a one-year program can be appealing. Some choose to enhance their expertise through top-ranked 1 year mpa online degrees that cultivate skills in management and governance within the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron Bansemer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles