World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
5384
World Ranking
8144
National Ranking
2908

Gerald M. Heymsfield publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald M. Heymsfield sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gerald M. Heymsfield D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald M. Heymsfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerald M. Heymsfield is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple aspects of Earth and planetary sciences, with a strong focus on atmospheric phenomena and meteorological processes.

The primary fields of study in Heymsfield's work include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Their subfields of study are diverse, covering:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Oceanography
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Aerospace Engineering

Main research topics addressed in Heymsfield's publications involve:

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
  • Climate variability and models

Heymsfield has published extensively, with frequent appearances in the following scientific venues:

  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Recent papers attributed to Heymsfield include:

  • Spaceborne Cloud and Precipitation Radars: Status, Challenges, and Ways Forward (2020, Reviews of Geophysics)
  • Chasing Snowstorms: The Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) Campaign (2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society)
  • Hydraulic jump dynamics above supercell thunderstorms (2021, Science)
  • The Dynamics of Vortex Rossby Waves and Secondary Eyewall Development in Hurricane Matthew (2016): New Insights from Radar Measurements (2020, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences)
  • Hydrometeor Size Sorting in the Asymmetric Eyewall of Hurricane Matthew (2016) (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)

Heymsfield frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Matthew McLinden
  • Timothy J. Lang
  • Lynn A. McMurdie
  • John E. Yorks
  • Rachael Kroodsma

Best Publications

  • Multiscale Observations of Hurricane Dennis (2005): The Effects of Hot Towers on Rapid Intensification

    Stephen R. Guimond;Gerald M. Heymsfield;F. Joseph Turk

  • Characteristics of Deep Tropical and Subtropical Convection from Nadir-Viewing High-Altitude Airborne Doppler Radar

    Gerald M. Heymsfield;Lin Tian;Andrew J. Heymsfield;Lihua Li

  • The Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E)

    M. P. Jensen;W. A. Petersen;Aaron R. Bansemer;N. Bharadwaj

  • A Method for Combined Passive-Active Microwave Retrievals of Cloud and Precipitation Profiles.

    William S. Olson;Christian D. Kummerow;Gerald M. Heymsfield;Louis Giglio

  • On the importance of small ice crystals in tropical anvil cirrus

    E. J. Jensen;P. Lawson;B. Baker;B. Pilson

  • ER-2 Doppler Radar Investigations of the Eyewall of Hurricane Bonnie during the Convection and Moisture Experiment-3

    Gerald M. Heymsfield;Jeffrey B. Halverson;Joanne Simpson;Lin Tian

  • The Saharan Air Layer and the Fate of African Easterly Waves—NASA's AMMA Field Study of Tropical Cyclogenesis

    Edward J. Zipser;Cynthia H. Twohy;Si Chee Tsay;K. Lee Thornhill

  • Spaceborne Cloud and Precipitation Radars: Status, Challenges, and Ways Forward.

    Alessandro Battaglia;Alessandro Battaglia;Pavlos Kollias;Pavlos Kollias;Ranvir Dhillon;Richard Roy

  • Factors Affecting the Evolution of Hurricane Erin (2001) and the Distributions of Hydrometeors: Role of Microphysical Processes

    Greg M. Mcfarquhar;Henian Zhang;Gerald Heymsfield;Robbie Hood

  • NASA's Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) Field Experiment

    Scott A. Braun;Ramesh Kakar;Edward Zipser;Gerald Heymsfield

  • Ice Cloud Retrievals and Analysis with the Compact Scanning Submillimeter Imaging Radiometer and the Cloud Radar System during CRYSTAL FACE

    K. Franklin Evans;James R. Wang;Paul E. Racette;Gerald Heymsfield

  • The EDOP radar system on the high-altitude NASA ER-2 aircraft

    Gerald M. Heymsfield;Steven W. Bidwell;I. Jeff Caylor;Syed Ameen

  • Warm Core Structure of Hurricane Erin Diagnosed from High Altitude Dropsondes during CAMEX-4

    Jeffrey B. Halverson;J. Simpson;G. Heymsfield;H. Pierce

  • A 94-GHz Cloud Radar System on a NASA High-Altitude ER-2 Aircraft

    Lihua Li;Gerald M. Heymsfield;Paul E. Racette;Lin Tian

  • Measurements of Ocean Surface Backscattering Using an Airborne 94-GHz Cloud Radar—Implication for Calibration of Airborne and Spaceborne W-Band Radars

    Lihua Li;Gerald M. Heymsfield;Lin Tian;Paul E. Racette

  • Chasing Snowstorms: The Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) Campaign

    Unknown

  • Structure and evolution of a severe squall line over Oklahoma

    Gerald M. Heymsfield;Steven Schotz

  • Florida thunderstorms: A faucet of reactive nitrogen to the upper troposphere

    B. Ridley;L. Ott;K. Pickering;L. Emmons

  • Satellite-observed characteristics of midwest severe thunderstorm anvils

    Gerald M. Heymsfield;Roy H. Blackmer

  • Combined lidar-radar remote sensing: Initial results from CRYSTAL-FACE

    M. J. McGill;L. Li;W. D. Hart;G. M. Heymsfield

  • Microphysics of Maritime Tropical Convective Updrafts at Temperatures from −20° to −60°

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer;Gerald Heymsfield;Alexandre O. Fierro

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Heymsfield
Andrew J. Heymsfield National Center for Atmospheric Research
Robert Meneghini
Robert Meneghini Goddard Space Flight Center
Edward J. Zipser
Edward J. Zipser University of Utah
Aaron Bansemer
Aaron Bansemer National Center for Atmospheric Research
Daniel J. Cecil
Daniel J. Cecil Marshall Space Flight Center
Scott A. Braun
Scott A. Braun Goddard Space Flight Center
Pavlos Kollias
Pavlos Kollias Stony Brook University
Zhien Wang
Zhien Wang University of Colorado Boulder
Joanne Simpson
Joanne Simpson Goddard Space Flight Center
Dennis L. Hlavka
Dennis L. Hlavka Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs like the best online eds to edd programs offer advanced education leadership opportunities, ideal for professionals aiming to influence environmental education policies and community outreach.

Social work also intersects with environmental issues, especially in areas of community health and sustainability. Pursuing affordable options such as dsw online programs can prepare students for vital roles in supporting vulnerable populations affected by environmental challenges.

For those seeking flexibility or a broader academic foundation, budget-friendly options like the budget friendly online general studies degree provide a customizable curriculum. This approach allows students to incorporate environmental topics alongside other interests.

Additionally, individuals considering an easier route to a degree for quick entry into the workforce may explore the easiest degree to get. While these programs may offer lower barriers to completion, it’s important to balance simplicity with career goals in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Gerald M. Heymsfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles