World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
63
Citations
16613
World Ranking
2447
National Ranking
984

Andrew S. Ackerman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew S. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 221 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew S. Ackerman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew S. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew S. Ackerman is affiliated with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within environmental and earth sciences, with a particular focus on atmospheric processes and climate modeling.

The main fields of study for this researcher include Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work further breaks down into subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Environmental Engineering, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The core topics covered in their research emphasize Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, and Aeolian processes and effects.

Andrew S. Ackerman has contributed to a number of scientific papers, including:

  • GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin, 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • A new look at the environmental conditions favorable to secondary ice production, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • CMIP6 Historical Simulations (1850-2014) With GISS-E2.1, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Future Climate Change Under SSP Emission Scenarios With GISS-E2.1, 2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Their frequent co-authors include Ann M. Fridlind, Israel Silber, G Cesana, Maxwell Kelley, and Anthony D. Del Genio. Collaboration with these researchers suggests a networked approach to advancing knowledge in atmospheric and climate science.

The primary publication venues where this researcher frequently publishes or contributes include:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Best Publications

  • Reduction of Tropical Cloudiness by Soot

    A. S. Ackerman;O. B. Toon;D. E. Stevens;A. J. Heymsfield

  • The Impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing

    Andrew S. Ackerman;Michael P. Kirkpatrick;David E. Stevens;Owen B. Toon

  • Evaluation of Large-Eddy Simulations via Observations of Nocturnal Marine Stratocumulus

    Bjorn Stevens;Chin-Hoh Moeng;Andrew S. Ackerman;Christopher S. Bretherton

  • GISS-E2.1: Configurations and Climatology.

    Maxwell Kelley;Gavin A. Schmidt;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Larissa S. Nazarenko;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives

    Daniel P. Grosvenor;Odran Sourdeval;Paquita Zuidema;Andrew Ackerman

  • Controls on precipitation and cloudiness in simulations of trade-wind cumulus as observed during RICO

    Margreet C vanZanten;Bjorn Stevens;Bjorn Stevens;Louise Nuijens;Louise Nuijens;Pier Siebesma;Pier Siebesma

  • Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud

    Stephen A. Klein;Renata B. McCoy;Hugh Morrison;Andrew S. Ackerman

  • Clouds and chemistry: Ultracool dwarf atmospheric properties from optical and infrared colors

    Mark S. Marley;S. Seager;D. Saumon;Katharina Lodders

  • Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer

    Andrew S. Ackerman;Margreet C. Vanzanten;Bjorn Stevens;Verica Savic-Jovcic

  • Simulations of Trade Wind Cumuli under a Strong Inversion

    Bjorn Stevens;Andrew S. Ackerman;Bruce A. Albrecht;Andrew R. Brown

  • Masses, Radii, and Cloud Properties of the HR 8799 Planets

    Mark S. Marley;Didier Saumon;Michael Cushing;Andrew S. Ackerman

  • Evidence of Cloud Disruption in the L/T Dwarf Transition

    Adam J. Burgasser;Mark S. Marley;Andrew S. Ackerman;Didier Saumon

  • Effects of Aerosols on Cloud Albedo: Evaluation of Twomey's Parameterization of Cloud Susceptibility Using Measurements of Ship Tracks.

    Andrew S. Ackerman;Owen B. Toon;Jonathan P. Taylor;Doug W. Johnson

  • New microphysics sensor for aircraft use

    H. Gerber;B.G. Arends;A.S. Ackerman

  • A comparison of chemistry and dust cloud formation in ultracool dwarf model atmospheres

    Ch. Helling;A. Ackerman;F. Allard;F. Allard;M. Dehn

  • Ice properties of single-layer stratocumulus during the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 2. Model results

    Ann M. Fridlind;A. S. Ackerman;Greg Michael McFarquhar;G. Zhang

  • An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

    Jens Redemann;Robert Wood;Paquita Zuidema;Sarah J. Doherty

  • Effects of Cloud Horizontal Inhomogeneity and Drizzle on Remote Sensing of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius: Case Studies Based on Large-eddy Simulations

    Zhibo Zhang;Zhibo Zhang;Andrew S. Ackerman;Graham Feingold;Steven Platnick

  • A Model for Particle Microphysics,Turbulent Mixing, and Radiative Transfer in the Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer and Comparisons with Measurements

    Andrew S. Ackerman;Peter V. Hobbs;Owen B. Toon

  • Evaluation of cloud-resolving and limited area model intercomparison simulations using TWP-ICE observations: 1. Deep convective updraft properties

    Adam Varble;Edward J. Zipser;Ann M. Fridlind;Ping Zhu

  • Effects of Domain Size and Numerical Resolution on the Simulation of Shallow Cumulus Convection

    David E. Stevens;Andrew S. Ackerman;Christopher S. Bretherton

  • Reduction of Tropical Cloudiness by Soot

    A. S. Ackerman;O. B. Toon;D. E. Stevens;A. J. Heymsfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann M. Fridlind
Ann M. Fridlind Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Brian Cairns
Brian Cairns Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Mark S. Marley
Mark S. Marley University of Arizona
Owen B. Toon
Owen B. Toon University of Colorado Boulder
Greg M. McFarquhar
Greg M. McFarquhar University of Oklahoma
Pavlos Kollias
Pavlos Kollias Stony Brook University
Steven Platnick
Steven Platnick Goddard Space Flight Center
Jiwen Fan
Jiwen Fan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Didier Saumon
Didier Saumon Los Alamos National Laboratory
Adrian Lock
Adrian Lock Met Office

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students consider the best affordable online general studies degree programs as a flexible and cost-effective way to build a solid knowledge base that complements environmental expertise.

In addition, some students prefer programs labeled among the easiest bachelor's degree options, which can help balance rigorous environmental science topics with manageable academic demands. This can be particularly appealing to those seeking to enter the workforce quickly.

For more specialized paths, pursuing a geology degree online offers focused knowledge in earth sciences, crucial for roles in natural resource management, conservation, and environmental assessment.

Another valuable discipline is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). An online geographic information systems degree equips students with skills in spatial data analysis, a key tool for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and disaster management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew S. Ackerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles