World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5184 4810 2450 2232 91 14065

Stella Ting-Toomey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stella Ting-Toomey between 1981 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stella Ting-Toomey published across 42 years, from 1981 to 2022, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2013. 3 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications
1981 2022

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stella Ting-Toomey: publications per year, 1981 to 2022
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 4
1989 2
1990 3
1991 5
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 3
2013 11
2014 5
2015 3
2016 2
2017 5
2018 0
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 2
Total 93
Download as CSV

Stella Ting-Toomey publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stella Ting-Toomey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 91
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Stella Ting-Toomey D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stella Ting-Toomey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Stella Ting-Toomey is affiliated with California State University, Fullerton in the United States. Their research spans several areas within the social sciences, focusing primarily on sociology, political science, social psychology, and health.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Religion and Society Interactions

Stella Ting-Toomey has published in notable academic venues, such as:

  • Negotiation and Conflict Management Research
  • The Journal of Communication and Religion

Two recent papers illustrate the scope of their research topics. The 2020 paper titled "Understanding Intergroup Conflict Complexity: An Application of the Socioecological Framework and the Integrative Identity Negotiation Theory" was published in Negotiation and Conflict Management Research. Another paper, published in 2022 in The Journal of Communication and Religion, is titled "If You Were a Good Christian...".

Collaborations feature prominently in their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Tenzin Dorjee
  • Arielle Leonard

Their research integrates multiple subfields, predominantly sociology and political science, along with contributions in social psychology and health. This interdisciplinary approach reflects the complexity of topics like conflict negotiation, social identity, and religion's role in society.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles Across Cultures

    William B. Gudykunst;Yuko Matsumoto;Stella Ting-Toomey;Tsukasa Nishida

  • Culture and interpersonal communication

    Stella Ting-Toomey;Elizabeth Chua;William B. Gudykunst

  • Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively

    Stella Ting-Toomey;John G. Oetzel

  • Facework competence in intercultural conflict: an updated face-negotiation theory

    Stella Ting-toomey;Atsuko Kurogi

  • Face Concerns in Interpersonal Conflict A Cross-Cultural Empirical Test of the Face Negotiation Theory

    John G. Oetzel;Stella Ting-Toomey

  • CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES

    Stella Ting‐Toomey;Ge Gao;Paula Trubisky;Zhizhong Yang

  • Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups

    Stella Ting-Toomey;Kimberlie K Yee-Jung;Robin B Shapiro;Wintilo Garcia

  • Face and facework in conflict: a cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States

    John Oetzel;Stella Ting-Toomey;Tomoko Masumoto;Yumiko Yokochi

  • The influence of individualism-collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles

    Paula Trubisky;Stella Ting-Toomey;Sung-Ling Lin

  • Communicating effectively with the Chinese

    Go Gao;Stella Ting-Toomey

  • Communication in personal relationships across cultures

    William B. Gudykunst;Stella Ting-Toomey;司 西田

  • Culture and Affective Communication

    William B. Gudykunst;Stella Ting-Toomey

  • Chinese communication processes.

    Ge Gao;Stella Ting-Toomey;William B. Gudykunst

  • Understanding Intercultural Communication

    Stella Ting-Toomey;Leeva C. Chung

  • Self‐construal types and conflict management styles

    Stella Ting‐Toomey;John G. Oetzel;Kimberlie Yee‐Jung

  • The challenge of facework : cross-cultural and interpersonal issues

    Stella Ting-Toomey

  • The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice

    John G. Oetzel;Stella Ting-Toomey;Bibiana Arcos;Phola Mabizela

  • A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers

    John G. Oetzel;Stella Ting‐Toomey;Yumiko Yokochi;Tomoko Masumoto

  • Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries.

    Stella Ting-Toomey

  • Facework in Japan and the United States

    Beth-Ann K. Cocroft;Stella Ting-Toomey

  • Cross-Cultural Interpersonal Communication

    Stella Ting-Toomey;Felipe Korzenny

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Oetzel
John G. Oetzel University of Waikato
William B. Gudykunst
William B. Gudykunst California State University, Fullerton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in social sciences or humanities? Online study options can offer affordable and flexible entry points into key fields. Degrees like an online psychology degree make it possible to begin or advance your psychology career without relocating or pausing your job.

Social work also offers promising online pathways. If you’re interested in helping communities or individuals, an msw degree online provides streamlined access to this impactful field, often with flexible admission requirements.

For those looking to pursue advanced clinical positions in psychology, consider the variety of psyd psychology programs available. These doctorates are typically oriented toward practical experience and licensure as a psychologist.

Interested in therapy with families or couples? There are also accelerated marriage and family therapy programs designed to help you enter the field quickly and efficiently.

By exploring these online degrees, you’ll find diverse options to fit your goals and career stage within the broad landscape of social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Stella Ting-Toomey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles