World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
3371
World Ranking
9477
National Ranking
4003

Leonard M. Eisenman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard M. Eisenman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 64 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Leonard M. Eisenman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard M. Eisenman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leonard M. Eisenman is affiliated with Thomas Jefferson University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific attention to Biophysics, Molecular Biology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covers topics including:

  • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Leonard M. Eisenman has contributed to publications in notable venues such as:

  • iScience
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent publications include:

  • A Comprehensive Integrated Anatomical and Molecular Atlas of Rat Intrinsic Cardiac Nervous System (2020, iScience)
  • A Comprehensive Integrated Anatomical and Molecular Atlas of Rodent Intrinsic Cardiac Nervous System (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors who have contributed to related research areas. These coauthors include:

  • Sirisha Achanta
  • Jonathan Gorky
  • Clara Leung
  • Alison Moss
  • Shaina Robbins

Best Publications

  • Parasagittal organization of the rat cerebellar cortex: direct correlation between antigenic Purkinje cell bands revealed by mabQ113 and the organization of the olivocerebellar projection

    Claude Gravel;Leonard M. Eisenman;Rachel Sasseville;Richard Hawkes

  • Antigenic compartmentation in the mouse cerebellar cortex: zebrin and HNK-1 reveal a complex, overlapping molecular topography.

    Leonard M. Eisenman;Richard Hawkes

  • A qualitative and quantitative light microscopic study of the inferior olivary complex of normal, reeler, and weaver mutant mice

    Gene J. Blatt;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • A Genetic Animal Model of Human Neocortical Heterotopia Associated with Seizures

    Kevin S. Lee;Frank Schottler;Jennifer L. Collins;Giuseppe Lanzino

  • Purkinje cell reduction in the reeler mutant mouse: A quantitative immunohistochemical study

    John A. Heckroth;Dan Goldowitz;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Olivary morphology and olivocerebellar topography in adult lurcher mutant mice

    John A. Heckroth;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Stripes and zones: the origins of regionalization of the adult cerebellum.

    R Hawkes;L M Eisenman

  • Morphological Correlates of Bilateral Synchrony in the Rat Cerebellar Cortex

    C. I. De Zeeuw;C. I. De Zeeuw;E. J. Lang;I. Sugihara;T. J. H. Ruigrok

  • 5'-Nucleotidase and the mabQ113 antigen share a common distribution in the cerebellar cortex of the mouse.

    L.M. Eisenman;R. Hawkes

  • External cuneocerebellar projection and Purkinje cell zebrin II bands: a direct comparison of parasagittal banding in the mouse cerebellum.

    Akinsegun Akintunde;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Neonatal Borna disease virus infection in the rat causes a loss of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum

    Eisenman Lm;Tran Mh;Kean Rb

  • Novel developmental boundary in the cerebellum revealed by zebrin expression in the Lurcher (Lc/+) mutant mouse

    David Tano;Julie A. Napieralski;Leonard M. Eisenman;Anne Messer

  • Olivocerebellar projections to the pyramis and copula pyramidis in the rat: differential projections to parasagittal zones.

    Leonard M. Eisenman

  • A Qualitative and Quantitative Light Microscopic Study of the Inferior Olivary Complex in the Adult Staggerer Mutant Mouse

    Gene J. Blatt;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Evidence of early topographic organization in the embryonic olivocerebellar projection: a model system for the study of pattern formation processes in the central nervous system.

    Michele A. Paradies;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Development of the spinocerebellar projection in the prenatal mouse

    Holly L. Grishkat;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Neural encoding of sound location: an electrophysiological study in auditory cortex (AI) of the cat using free field stimuli.

    Unknown

  • Developmental analysis of the external granular layer in the meander tail mutant mouse: do cerebellar microneurons have independent progenitors?

    Julie A. Napieralski;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Topographic and zonal organization of the olivocerebellar projection in the reeler mutant mouse.

    Gene J. Blatt;Leonard M. Eisenman

  • Development of the cerebellar cortical efferent projection: an in-vitro anterograde tracing study in rat brain slices.

    Leonard M. Eisenman;M.P.A. Schalekamp;Jan Voogd

  • Postnatal Neurophysiologic Effects of Prenatal X-irradiation

    R.P. Jensh;L.M. Eisenman;R.L. Brent

  • A Comprehensive Integrated Anatomical and Molecular Atlas of Rat Intrinsic Cardiac Nervous System

    Sirisha Achanta;Jonathan Gorky;Clara Leung;Alison Moss

  • Book reviewFetal and Neonatal Brain Injury: Mechanisms, Management and Risks of Practice: David K. Stevenson, William E. Benitz, Phillip Sunshine (Eds.); New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 907 pages, $190

    Leonard M. Eisenman

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Hawkes
Richard Hawkes University of Calgary
Gene J. Blatt
Gene J. Blatt Hussman Institute for Autism
Dan Goldowitz
Dan Goldowitz University of British Columbia
James S. Schwaber
James S. Schwaber Thomas Jefferson University
Tom J. H. Ruigrok
Tom J. H. Ruigrok Erasmus University Rotterdam
Richard J. Smeyne
Richard J. Smeyne Thomas Jefferson University
Kevin S. Lee
Kevin S. Lee University of Virginia
James C. Saunders
James C. Saunders University of Pennsylvania
Bernhard Dietzschold
Bernhard Dietzschold Thomas Jefferson University
Thomas E. Johnson
Thomas E. Johnson University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of online programs and specialized career paths. Students interested in the intersection of brain science and mental health may want to consider further study in counseling or therapy fields. Specialized CACREP-accredited online counseling programs provide a pathway to licensure and clinical practice, while still offering the flexibility of remote learning.

For those focused on promoting psychological well-being, numerous online mental health degree programs prepare graduates for roles in hospitals, schools, and community agencies. Individuals interested in family dynamics and relationship therapy might explore an online masters MFT, which emphasizes both theory and hands-on clinical experience.

Additionally, obtaining a masters in psychology can support careers in research, education, or organizational consulting. Each of these online pathways complements neuroscience studies and enhances career versatility for graduates seeking meaningful impact in health and science fields.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard M. Eisenman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles