World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
12552
World Ranking
4417
National Ranking
1642

Wilfred M. Wollheim publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilfred M. Wollheim sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Wilfred M. Wollheim D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilfred M. Wollheim sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wilfred M. Wollheim is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in subfields such as environmental chemistry, water science and technology, ecology, global and planetary change, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's work spans a variety of main topics, including soil and water nutrient dynamics, hydrology and watershed management studies, marine and coastal ecosystems, fish ecology and management studies, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, peatlands and wetlands ecology, and urban stormwater management solutions.

Frequent collaborators of Wilfred M. Wollheim include Shan Zuidema, Richard B. Lammers, Andrew L. Robison, William H. McDowell, and Lauren Koenig. These collaborations reflect active engagement in diverse environmental research projects and interdisciplinary studies.

Wilfred M. Wollheim has published numerous articles in respected venues. The most frequent publication outlets include the Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Research Square, Geoscientific Model Development, and The Science of The Total Environment.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Wollheim are:

  • Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality, 2022, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Superlinear scaling of riverine biogeochemical function with watershed size, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Prediction of riverine daily minimum dissolved oxygen concentrations using hybrid deep learning and routine hydrometeorological data, 2024, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of methane ebullition in lowland headwater streams and the impact on sampling design, 2021, Limnology and Oceanography
  • The overlooked role of diffuse household livestock production in nitrogen pollution at the watershed scale, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production

Best Publications

  • Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams

    Bruce J. Peterson;Wilfred M. Wollheim;Patrick J. Mulholland;Jackson R. Webster

  • Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss

    Linda A. Deegan;David Samuel Johnson;David Samuel Johnson;R. Scott Warren;Bruce J. Peterson

  • Nitrous oxide emission from denitrification in stream and river networks

    Jake J. Beaulieu;Jennifer L. Tank;Stephen K. Hamilton;Wilfred M. Wollheim

  • The regional and global significance of nitrogen removal in lakes and reservoirs

    John A. Harrison;Roxane J. Maranger;Richard B. Alexander;Anne E. Giblin

  • NITROGEN CYCLING IN A FOREST STREAM DETERMINED BY A 15N TRACER ADDITION

    Patrick J. Mulholland;Jennifer L. Tank;Diane M. Sanzone;Wilfred M. Wollheim

  • Factors affecting ammonium uptake in streams – an inter‐biome perspective

    Jackson R. Webster;Patrick J. Mulholland;Jennifer L. Tank;H. Maurice Valett

  • N uptake as a function of concentration in streams

    Walter K. Dodds;Amanda J. Lopez;William B. Bowden;Stan Gregory

  • Taking the pulse of snowmelt: in situ sensors reveal seasonal, event and diurnal patterns of nitrate and dissolved organic matter variability in an upland forest stream

    Brian A. Pellerin;John Franco Saraceno;James B. Shanley;Stephen D. Sebestyen

  • Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes

    Richard B. Alexander;John Karl Böhlke;Elizabeth W. Boyer;Mark B. David

  • Relationship between river size and nutrient removal

    Wilfred M. Wollheim;Charles J. Vorosmarty;Bruce J. Peterson;Sybil P. Seitzinger

  • The impact of flooding on aquatic ecosystem services.

    Ceara J. Talbot;Elena M. Bennett;Kelsie Cassell;Daniel M. Hanes

  • Can uptake length in streams be determined by nutrient addition experiments? Results from an interbiome comparison study

    P. J. Mulholland;J. L. Tank;J. R. Webster;W. B. Bowden

  • Temperature and peat type control CO2 and CH4 production in Alaskan permafrost peats

    Claire C. Treat;Wilfred M. Wollheim;Ruth K. Varner;Andrew S. Grandy

  • Global N removal by freshwater aquatic systems using a spatially distributed, within‐basin approach

    Wilfred M. Wollheim;Charles J. Vorosmarty;A. F. Bouwman;Pamela Green

  • Influence of stream size on ammonium and suspended particulate nitrogen processing

    Wilfred M. Wollheim;Bruce J. Peterson;Linda A. Deegan;John E. Hobbie

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment scenario drivers (1970–2050): Climate and hydrological alterations

    Balázs M. Fekete;Dominik Wisser;Carolien Kroeze;Carolien Kroeze;Emilio Mayorga

  • Quantification of the Nitrogen Cycle in a Prairie Stream

    Walter K. Dodds;Michelle A. Evans-White;Nicole M. Gerlanc;Lawrence Gray

  • N Retention in Urbanizing Headwater Catchments

    Wilfred M. Wollheim;Brian A. Pellerin;Charles J. Vörösmarty;Charles S. Hopkinson

  • Oxygen, organic matter, and sediment granulometry as controls on hyporheic animal communities

    David L. Strayer;S. E. Mayewski;Pamela Nielsen;Wilfred M. Wollheim

  • Analysis of nitrogen cycling in a forest stream during autumn using a 15N‐tracer addition

    Jennifer L. Tank;Judy L. Meyer;Diane M. Sanzone;Patrick J. Mulholland

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. Bowden
William B. Bowden University of Vermont
Charles J. Vörösmarty
Charles J. Vörösmarty City College of New York
Michael N. Gooseff
Michael N. Gooseff University of Colorado Boulder
William H. McDowell
William H. McDowell University of New Hampshire
Bruce J. Peterson
Bruce J. Peterson Marine Biological Laboratory
Jennifer L. Tank
Jennifer L. Tank University of Notre Dame
Charles S. Hopkinson
Charles S. Hopkinson University of Georgia
Patrick J. Mulholland
Patrick J. Mulholland Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jackson R. Webster
Jackson R. Webster Virginia Tech
Walter K. Dodds
Walter K. Dodds Kansas State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which intersect with other fields. For example, a geographic information systems degree is highly relevant for environmental professionals focused on mapping, spatial analysis, and natural resource management. This tech-driven expertise enhances environmental data precision and decision-making.

Leadership and policy skills are equally important in environmental careers. Pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration programs can prepare graduates to influence environmental policy and manage public projects effectively, bridging science and governance.

Understanding human behavior is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. Online sociology degrees, such as those found among the best online bachelors in sociology programs, provide insight into societal trends and community impacts, vital for sustainable development initiatives.

For educators and researchers in environmental studies, flexible doctoral options like online EdD programs no dissertation offer accelerated paths to advanced credentials without the traditional dissertation requirement, making higher education more accessible.

Combining environmental science with these related fields can significantly enhance career prospects and create a broader impact on sustainability and environmental stewardship.

Best Scientists Citing Wilfred M. Wollheim

Trending Scientists