World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard H. Glazier

Richard H. Glazier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 82 337 288 19 18 333 22667
Medicine 83 15674 14745 655 623 363 23776

Richard H. Glazier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard H. Glazier between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard H. Glazier published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 13.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2023. 24 of the 432 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2023. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 13 publications
1995 2025

432 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard H. Glazier: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 3
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 9
2003 8
2004 16
2005 9
2006 14
2007 15
2008 15
2009 21
2010 16
2011 24
2012 21
2013 17
2014 20
2015 23
2016 21
2017 19
2018 21
2019 5
2020 14
2021 20
2022 23
2023 40
2024 11
2025 13
Total 432
Download as CSV

Richard H. Glazier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard H. Glazier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 324–333 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 333 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81 333
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard H. Glazier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard H. Glazier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21 82
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard H. Glazier is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in health professions and medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including general health professions, economics and econometrics, public health, environmental and occupational health, emergency medical services, and oncology.

Glazier's research interests focus on primary care and health outcomes, healthcare policy and management, global health workforce issues, chronic disease management strategies, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, patient satisfaction in healthcare, and health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

The scientist has published multiple papers in well-known journals. Recent noteworthy papers include:

  • Shifts in office and virtual primary care during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada (2021) published in Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • Informing Canada's Health System Response to COVID-19: Priorities for Health Services and Policy Research (2020) published in Healthcare policy
  • Family Physicians Stopping Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada (2022) published in The Annals of Family Medicine
  • Association of Early Physician Follow-up With Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2022) published in JAMA Network Open
  • Changes over time in patient visits and continuity of care among graduating cohorts of family physicians in 4 Canadian provinces (2022) published in Canadian Medical Association Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Glazier include:

  • Michael Green
  • Tara Kiran
  • Eliot Frymire
  • Kamila Premji
  • Meghan McMahon

Their work has been published regularly in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • CMAJ Open
  • The Annals of Family Medicine
  • Canadian Family Physician
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal

Richard H. Glazier's research output reflects significant involvement in health services research and policy, with a particular focus on the Canadian healthcare system. Through investigations of primary care delivery, physician workforce changes, and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, their work addresses important aspects of healthcare access and quality in Canada and beyond.

Best Publications

  • Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty

    G A Hawker;J G Wright;P C Coyte;J I Williams

  • Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

    Pasqualina L Santaguida;Gillian A Hawker;Pamela L Hudak;Richard Glazier

  • A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models

    Rahim Moineddin;Flora I Matheson;Flora I Matheson;Richard H Glazier

  • Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy

    Sally Green;Rachelle Buchbinder;Richard Glazier;Andrew Forbes

  • A Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Diabetes Care in Socially Disadvantaged Populations

    Richard H. Glazier;Jana Bajcar;Natalie R. Kennie;Kristie Willson

  • Stress, social support, and emotional distress in a community sample of pregnant women

    RH Glazier;FJ Elgar;V Goel;S Holzapfel

  • Development of the Canadian Marginalization Index: A New Tool for the Study of Inequality

    Flora I Matheson;James R Dunn;Katherine L W Smith;Rahim Moineddin

  • Patient support and education for promoting adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS

    Sergio Rueda;Laura Y. Park‐Wyllie;Ahmed Bayoumi;Anne‐Marie Tynan

  • Urban neighborhoods, chronic stress, gender and depression.

    Flora I. Matheson;Rahim Moineddin;James R. Dunn;James R. Dunn;Maria Isabella Creatore

  • Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences.

    Gillian A. Hawker;James G. Wright;Peter C. Coyte;Jeannette N. Williams

  • Association of Neighborhood Walkability With Change in Overweight, Obesity, and Diabetes

    Maria I. Creatore;Maria I. Creatore;Richard H. Glazier;Rahim Moineddin;Ghazal S. Fazli;Ghazal S. Fazli;Ghazal S. Fazli

  • Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review.

    A.J. Gagnon;M. Zimbeck;J. Zeitlin

  • Élaboration de l’indice de marginalisation canadien: un nouvel outil d’étude des inégalités

    Flora I. Matheson;Flora I. Matheson;James R. Dunn;Katherine L. W. Smith;Rahim Moineddin

  • Age- and sex-related prevalence of diabetes mellitus among immigrants to Ontario, Canada

    Maria Isabella Creatore;Rahim Moineddin;Gillian Booth;Doug H Manuel

  • Public health measures to control the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome during the outbreak in Toronto.

    Tomislav Svoboda;Bonnie Henry;Leslie Shulman;Erin Kennedy

  • Using administrative data to measure ambulatory mental health service provision in primary care.

    Leah S. Steele;Richard H. Glazier;Elizabeth Lin;Michael Evans

  • The effect of patients' sex on physicians' recommendations for total knee arthroplasty

    Cornelia M. Borkhoff;Gillian A. Hawker;Hans J. Kreder;Richard H. Glazier

  • Effectiveness of aerobic exercise for adults living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis using the Cochrane Collaboration protocol

    Kelly K. O’Brien;Anne-Marie Tynan;Stephanie A. Nixon;Richard H. Glazier

  • Somali women and their pregnancy outcomes postmigration: Data from six receiving countries

    Rhonda Small;Anita Gagnon;Mika Gissler;Jennifer Zeitlin;Jennifer Zeitlin

  • A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

    Gillian A. Hawker;Jun Guan;Ruth Croxford;Peter C. Coyte

Frequent Co-Authors

Rahim Moineddin
Rahim Moineddin University of Toronto
Flora I. Matheson
Flora I. Matheson University of Toronto
James R. Dunn
James R. Dunn McMaster University
Peter M. Smith
Peter M. Smith University of Toronto
Peter C. Austin
Peter C. Austin University of Toronto
Stephen W. Hwang
Stephen W. Hwang University of Toronto
Gillian A. Hawker
Gillian A. Hawker University of Toronto
James G. Wright
James G. Wright University of Toronto
Wendy Levinson
Wendy Levinson University of Toronto
Muhammad Mamdani
Muhammad Mamdani University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities unlocks a range of rewarding career options. Many students begin with an accredited online psychology degree, which offers a strong foundation for roles in counseling, human resources, and community support.

If your goal is to make a direct impact in social work, consider the easiest online msw program to get started quickly and flexibly. Those aiming for clinical practice or research in psychology may be interested in the best psyd programs for advanced training and licensure preparation.

Marriage and family therapy is another fast-growing field. For students looking to earn credentials faster, choosing one of the accelerated online mft programs can shorten your pathway to certification and the workforce.

Each of these online programs offers flexibility and accessibility for diverse learners. Carefully compare program accreditation, duration, and outcomes to find the best fit for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard H. Glazier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles