World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James G. Wright

James G. Wright

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
31666
World Ranking
14936
National Ranking
621

James G. Wright publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James G. Wright sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James G. Wright D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James G. Wright sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James G. Wright is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with contributions spanning 28 publications. They work extensively within several subfields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, and Surgery.

The scientist's research topics cover a variety of areas within healthcare, such as Healthcare Policy and Management, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, and Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Trends in prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity in Ontario, Canada (2021) published in Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon self-reported physician burnout in Ontario, Canada: evidence from a repeated cross-sectional survey (2022) published in BMJ Open
  • Disparities in Physician Compensation by Gender in Ontario, Canada (2021) published in JAMA Network Open
  • What is the functional mobility and quality of life in patients with cerebral palsy following single-event multilevel surgery? (2020) published in Journal of Children s Orthopaedics
  • Dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, including adjustments for renal impairment, for Phase IIa and Phase III evaluation (2024) published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James G. Wright include:

  • Sharada Weir (9 publications)
  • Jasmin Kantarevic (8 publications)
  • Nadine Chami (6 publications)
  • Shaun Shaikh (4 publications)
  • Daniel C. Perry (4 publications)

The main venues where this researcher publishes are:

  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (3 publications)
  • BMJ Open (2 publications)
  • JAMA Network Open (2 publications)
  • Journal of Children s Orthopaedics (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Integrated Care (2 publications)

James G. Wright has also contributed to book publications, including titles published by Cornell University Press eBooks and Brandeis University Press eBooks. The books include "Robots Won't Save Japan" (2023) with 19 citations, and "War and American Life" (2022).

Best Publications

  • Introducing levels of evidence to the journal

    J. Wright;M. Swiontkowski;J. Heckman

  • Measuring the whole or the parts?: Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity

    Dorcas E. Beaton;Dorcas E. Beaton;Jeffrey N. Katz;Jeffrey N. Katz;Anne H. Fossel;James G. Wright;James G. Wright

  • Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.

    Dorcas E Beaton;James G Wright;Jeffrey N Katz

  • The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome.

    Dianne L. Groll;Teresa To;Claire Bombardier;James G. Wright

  • Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

    Stuart L. Weinstein;Lori A. Dolan;James G. Wright;Matthew B. Dobbs

  • Erratum: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) (American Journal of Industrial Medicine (1996) 29:6 (602-608))

    P. L. Hudak;P. C. Amadio;C. Bombardier;D. Beaton

  • Health-Related Quality of Life after Knee Replacement. Results of the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team Study*

    Gillian Hawker;James Wright;Peter Coyte;John Paul

  • The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcomes Instruments: Normative Values from the General Population

    Frank G. Hunsaker;Dominic A. Cioffi;Peter C. Amadio;James G. Wright

  • Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty

    G A Hawker;J G Wright;P C Coyte;J I Williams

  • Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria.

    Brent Graham;Glenn Regehr;James G Wright

  • Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

    Pasqualina L Santaguida;Gillian A Hawker;Pamela L Hudak;Richard Glazier

  • Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

    A. M. Davis;J. G. Wright;J. I. Williams;C. Bombardier

  • Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale.

    Robert G. Marx;Claire Bombardier;Sheila Hogg-Johnson;James G. Wright

  • A comparison of different indices of responsiveness

    James G. Wright;Nancy L. Young

  • The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures.

    Pamela L. Hudak;James G. Wright

  • Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences.

    Gillian A. Hawker;James G. Wright;Peter C. Coyte;Jeannette N. Williams

  • External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial.

    Timothy J Whelan;Jim A Julian;Tanya S Berrang;Do-Hoon Kim

  • Measurement properties of the Activities Scale for Kids

    N L Young;J I Williams;K K Yoshida;J G Wright

  • Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference.

    Dorcas E. Beaton;Claire Bombardier;Jeffrey N. Katz;James G. Wright

  • Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial

    Flavia K Borges;Mohit Bhandari;Ernesto Guerra-Farfan;Ameen Patel

Frequent Co-Authors

Gillian A. Hawker
Gillian A. Hawker University of Toronto
Claire Bombardier
Claire Bombardier University of Toronto
Nizar N. Mahomed
Nizar N. Mahomed University Health Network
Andrew W. Howard
Andrew W. Howard California Institute of Technology
Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Benjamin A. Alman
Benjamin A. Alman Duke University
Robert G. Marx
Robert G. Marx Hospital for Special Surgery
Richard H. Glazier
Richard H. Glazier University of Toronto
Aileen M. Davis
Aileen M. Davis University of Toronto
Marc F. Swiontkowski
Marc F. Swiontkowski University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA offers many opportunities beyond the traditional MD route. Today, students and working professionals alike are turning to online programs to build specialized skills and advance their healthcare careers.

For those interested in psychiatric care, the msn to pmhnp online pathway is gaining popularity—allowing nurses to specialize in psychiatric mental health nursing and address growing mental health needs. Similarly, aspiring healthcare leaders can elevate their credentials through an online healthcare administration degree, which prepares graduates for managerial and administrative roles.

Affordability and flexibility are key concerns for many students. For example, online mha programs affordable make it easier to earn a master’s degree while balancing work or family responsibilities. Nurses seeking to reach the highest clinical practice level can consider the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs, which provide advanced training at a lower cost.

These online degrees provide alternative career pathways and make advanced healthcare education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing James G. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles