World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
9682
World Ranking
5450
National Ranking
567

Edmund Keogh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Keogh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edmund Keogh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Keogh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edmund Keogh is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom and has published extensively in the field of medicine, focusing primarily on pain research. Their body of work spans various subfields, including pharmacology, psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, cognitive neuroscience, and public health.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to pain and health, with particular emphasis on:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Sex and Gender in Healthcare

Keogh has contributed to several frequent publication venues, most notably:

  • Pain
  • Journal of Pain
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Recent notable papers by Keogh include:

  • "Sex and gender differences in pain: past, present, and future" (2022, Pain)
  • "The gender context of pain" (2020, Health Psychology Review)

Other key papers relevant to their research network include:

  • "The social threats of COVID-19 for people with chronic pain" (2020, Pain)
  • "Social Determinants and Consequences of Pain: Toward Multilevel, Intersectional, and Life Course Perspectives" (2024, Journal of Pain)
  • "The establishment, maintenance, and adaptation of high- and low-impact chronic pain: a framework for biopsychosocial pain research" (2023, Pain)

Keogh frequently collaborates with peers such as Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Amanda C de C Williams, Kai Karos, and Joanna McParland. Their collaborative work contributes to knowledge on the complexity of pain conditions and management strategies.

Best Publications

  • A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory

    Jane Lessiter;Jonathan Freeman;Edmund Keogh;Jules Davidoff

  • Gender, coping and the perception of pain.

    Edmund Keogh;Malin Herdenfeldt

  • Psychological therapies (Internet‐delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults

    Christopher Eccleston;Emma Fisher;Lorraine Craig;Geoffrey B Duggan

  • Selective attentional bias for pain-related stimuli amongst pain fearful individuals

    Edmund Keogh;Deborah Ellery;Caroline Hunt;Ian Hannent

  • The interruptive effect of pain on attention

    David J Moore;Edmund Keogh;Christopher Eccleston

  • Anxiety sensitivity, cognitive biases, and the experience of pain.

    Edmund Keogh;Mary Cochrane

  • Exploring the factor structure of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ).

    Edmund Keogh;John Reidy

  • Avoidance versus focused attention and the perception of pain: differential effects for men and women

    Edmund Keogh;Karen Hatton;Deborah Ellery

  • Sex differences in adolescent chronic pain and pain-related coping.

    Edmund Keogh;Christopher Eccleston;Christopher Eccleston

  • Social competition in school: relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality.

    Jon Sutton;Edmund Keogh

  • Do men and women differ in their response to interdisciplinary chronic pain management

    Edmund Keogh;Lance M. McCracken;Christopher Eccleston

  • Improving academic performance and mental health through a stress management intervention : Outcomes and mediators of change

    Edmund Keogh;Frank W. Bond;Paul E. Flaxman

  • Bridging the gap between pain and gender research: a selective literature review.

    Sónia F. Bernardes;Edmund Keogh;Maria Luísa Lima

  • Comparing acceptance- and control-based coping instructions on the cold-pressor pain experiences of healthy men and women.

    Edmund Keogh;Frank W. Bond;Ruth Hanmer;Jackie Tilston

  • Acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action may counteract fear and avoidance of emotions in chronic pain: an analysis of anxiety sensitivity.

    Lance M. McCracken;Edmund Keogh

  • Selective attentional biases for physical threat in physical anxiety sensitivity.

    Edmund Keogh;Catherine Dillon;George Georgiou;Caroline Hunt

  • Test anxiety, evaluative stress, and susceptibility to distraction from threat

    Edmund Keogh;Christopher C. French

  • Test anxiety, susceptibility to distraction and examination performance

    Edmund Keogh;Frank W. Bond;Christopher C. French;Anne Richards

  • Raising the topic of weight in general practice: perspectives of GPs and primary care nurses

    Maxine Blackburn;Afroditi Stathi;Edmund Keogh;Christopher Eccleston

  • Gender moderates the association between depression and disability in chronic pain patients

    Edmund Keogh;Lance M. McCracken;Christopher Eccleston

  • Does Anxiety Sensitivity Predict Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Following Childbirth? A Preliminary Report

    Edmund Keogh;Susan Ayers;Harriet Francis

  • Sex Differences in Pain

    Edmund Keogh

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston University of Bath
Christopher C. French
Christopher C. French Goldsmiths University of London
Lance M. McCracken
Lance M. McCracken Uppsala University
Frank W. Bond
Frank W. Bond Goldsmiths University of London
Kevin E. Vowles
Kevin E. Vowles Queen's University Belfast
Karen Rodham
Karen Rodham University of Chichester
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Christine T. Chambers
Christine T. Chambers Dalhousie University
Jules Davidoff
Jules Davidoff Goldsmiths University of London
Anne Richards
Anne Richards Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a wide range of career opportunities, especially in counseling and mental health services. There are many routes to becoming a counselor, with online programs making this pathway even more accessible. From associate to master's degrees, online study allows greater flexibility and, in many cases, a shorter pathway to launching your career.

Each state has its own requirements for licensing and education. If you are looking for the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Louisiana or want to explore shortest path to becoming a counselor in Maryland, streamlined online programs can help you achieve your goals faster. Similarly, those interested in New England may prefer Maine fastest counseling programs or the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Massachusetts.

Whether you are just starting out or advancing your credentials, these online degree options can provide a direct, efficient path to a rewarding career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Edmund Keogh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles