World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
14534
World Ranking
6811
National Ranking
3693

Martin Buschkuehl publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Buschkuehl sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin Buschkuehl D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Buschkuehl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Buschkuehl is a researcher affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a specific focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, as well as artificial intelligence and education. The main topics of their research include cognitive abilities and testing, neural and behavioral psychology studies, child and animal learning development, cognitive science and mapping, functional brain connectivity studies, early childhood education and development, and educational and psychological assessments.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Quantifying the Difference Between Active and Passive Control Groups in Cognitive Interventions Using Two Meta-analytical Approaches (2020, Journal of Cognitive Enhancement)
  • Action video game play facilitates "learning to learn" (2021, Communications Biology)
  • Neural correlates of working memory training: Evidence for plasticity in older adults (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Age differences in functional network reconfiguration with working memory training (2021, Human Brain Mapping)
  • The Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement is Mediated and Moderated by Executive Functions (2024, Journal of Youth and Adolescence)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin Buschkuehl include:

  • Susanne M. Jaeggi
  • John Jonides
  • Ru-Yuan Zhang
  • Adrien Chopin
  • Kengo Shibata

The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • Communications Biology
  • Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Martin Buschkuehl's research is concentrated on understanding cognitive functions and brain plasticity, particularly in relation to working memory training, cognitive interventions, and the impact of socioeconomic factors on academic achievement. The interdisciplinary nature of their work involves combining psychological assessments with neuroscience methodologies to explore cognitive development and enhancement across different populations and age groups.

Best Publications

  • Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;John Jonides;Walter J. Perrig

  • The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure

    Susanne M Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Walter J Perrig;Beat Meier

  • Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;John Jonides;Priti Shah

  • Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis

    Jacky Au;Ellen Sheehan;Nancy Tsai;Greg J. Duncan

  • The Relationship between N-Back Performance and Matrix Reasoning--Implications for Training and Transfer.

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Barbara Studer-Luethi;Barbara Studer-Luethi;Martin Buschkuehl;Yi-Fen Su

  • Improving intelligence: a literature review.

    Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Priti Shah;John Jonides

  • Working memory training improves reading processes in typically developing children

    Sandra V. Loosli;Martin Buschkuehl;Walter J. Perrig;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults.

    Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Sara Hutchison;Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello

  • The everyday emotional experience of adults with major depressive disorder: Examining emotional instability, inertia, and reactivity.

    Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl

  • Maladaptive coping, adaptive coping, and depressive symptoms: Variations across age and depressive state

    Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl

  • Resting state cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity networks: a comparison of anatomical and self-organizing map approaches.

    Jessica A. Bernard;Rachael D. Seidler;Kelsey M. Hassevoort;Bryan L. Benson

  • Emotion-Network Density in Major Depressive Disorder

    Madeline Lee Pe;Katharina Kircanski;Renee J. Thompson;Laura F. Bringmann

  • Neuronal effects following working memory training.

    Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi;John Jonides

  • Feeling Blue or Turquoise? Emotional Differentiation in Major Depressive Disorder

    Emre Demiralp;Renee J. Thompson;Jutta Mata;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Walk on the bright side: Physical activity and affect in major depressive disorder.

    Jutta Mata;Renee J. Thompson;Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl

  • On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload

    Susanne M. Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Alex Etienne;Christoph Ozdoba

  • Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions.

    L. Robert Slevc;Nicholas S. Davey;Martin Buschkuehl;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Differential effect of motivational features on training improvements in school-based cognitive training

    Benjamin Katz;Susanne Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Alyse Stegman

  • Enhancing working memory training with transcranial direct current stimulation

    Jacky Au;Benjamin Katz;Martin Buschkuehl;Kimberly Bunarjo

  • There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015).

    Jacky Au;Martin Buschkuehl;Greg J. Duncan;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Improving Fluid Intelligence With Training on Working Memory: A Meta-Analysis: (524912015-029)

    Jacky Au;Ellen Sheehan;Nancy Tsai;Greg J. Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Susanne M. Jaeggi
Susanne M. Jaeggi University of California, Irvine
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Priti Shah
Priti Shah University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott Peltier
Scott Peltier University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University
Jutta Mata
Jutta Mata University of Mannheim
Walter J. Perrig
Walter J. Perrig University of Bern
Renee J. Thompson
Renee J. Thompson Washington University in St. Louis
Jessica A. Bernard
Jessica A. Bernard Texas A&M University
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse careers, especially in behavioral analysis and therapy. Many students choose to pursue specialties like becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), an in-demand credential for those looking to work with individuals with behavioral disorders, including autism spectrum disorder.

Each state has specific requirements for BCBA certification. For example, if you are interested in learning how to become a bcba in Vermont, you’ll need to complete an accredited graduate program, gain supervised experience, and pass the national exam. Similarly, becoming a bcba in Virginia entails meeting state-specific educational and training standards.

Students can also explore bcba certification requirements in Washington or discover how to become a bcba in West Virginia for further guidance on local licensure and job outlooks. Understanding these pathways helps prospective psychology students plan for advanced roles and specialized certification, with many programs now offered fully online for greater flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Buschkuehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles