World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carien M. van Reekum

Carien M. van Reekum

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8482 7920 847 809 107 8008

Carien M. van Reekum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carien M. van Reekum between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carien M. van Reekum published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 12 of the 132 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1996 2025

132 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carien M. van Reekum: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 2
2012 7
2013 9
2014 7
2015 5
2016 6
2017 5
2018 8
2019 10
2020 9
2021 19
2022 11
2023 8
2024 5
2025 7
Total 132
Download as CSV

Carien M. van Reekum publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carien M. van Reekum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Carien M. van Reekum D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carien M. van Reekum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Carien M. van Reekum is affiliated with the University of Reading in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research across multiple domains in neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Their work spans cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, pharmacology, physiology, and social psychology, covering a total of 42 publications in neuroscience, 38 in psychology, and 28 in medicine.

Their research focuses on a range of topics including anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, mental health, pain mechanisms and treatments, memory and neural mechanisms, functional brain connectivity, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, and pain management including placebo effects.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with van Reekum include Jayne Morriss, Wiebke Gandhi, Tim V. Salomons, Richard Harrison, and Shannon Wake.

Van Reekum's publications are often featured in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), PAIN Reports, Pain, Psychophysiology, and the Journal of Neuroscience.

Recent papers from van Reekum's research portfolio include the following:

  • "The rise of affectivism," 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Cognitive and Affective Empathy Relate Differentially to Emotion Regulation," 2021, Affective Science
  • "Do "central sensitization" questionnaires reflect measures of nociceptive sensitization or psychological constructs? A systematic review and meta-analyses," 2022, Pain
  • "Intolerance of uncertainty and threat generalization: A replication and extension," 2020, Psychophysiology
  • "I Doubt It Is Safe: A Meta-analysis of Self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty and Threat Extinction Training," 2021, Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science

Best Publications

  • Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predict the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults

    Heather L. Urry;Carina Marije Van Reekum;Tom Johnstone;Ned H. Kalin

  • Failure to regulate : Counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression

    Tom Johnstone;Carina Marije Van Reekum;Heather L. Urry;Ned H. Kalin

  • Gaze fixations predict brain activation during the voluntary regulation of picture-induced negative affect

    Carina Marije Van Reekum;Tom Johnstone;Heather L. Urry;Marchell E. Thurow

  • Effects of hydration status on cognitive performance and mood

    Natalie A. Masento;Mark Golightly;David T. Field;Laurie T. Butler

  • Purpose in life predicts better emotional recovery from negative stimuli.

    Stacey M. Schaefer;Jennifer Morozink Boylan;Carien M. van Reekum;Regina C. Lapate

  • Individual Differences in Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity are Associated with Evaluation Speed and Psychological Well-being

    Carien M. van Reekum;Heather L. Urry;Tom Johnstone;Marchell E. Thurow

  • Amygdala-prefrontal coupling underlies individual differences in emotion regulation.

    Hyejeen Lee;Aaron S. Heller;Carien M. van Reekum;Brady Nelson

  • The voice of emotion: an FMRI study of neural responses to angry and happy vocal expressions

    Tom Johnstone;Carien M. van Reekum;Terrence R. Oakes;Richard J. Davidson

  • Individual differences in some (but not all) medial prefrontal regions reflect cognitive demand while regulating unpleasant emotion.

    Heather L. Urry;Carina Marije Van Reekum;Tom Johnstone;Richard J. Davidson

  • Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game

    Carien M. Van Reekum;Tom Johnstone;Rainer Banse;Alexandre Etter

  • The rise of affectivism

    Daniel Dukes;Daniel Dukes;Kathryn Abrams;Ralph Adolphs;Mohammed E. Ahmed

  • Conscientiousness predicts greater recovery from negative emotion.

    Kristin N. Javaras;Stacey M. Schaefer;Carien M. van Reekum;Regina C. Lapate

  • Sustained Striatal Activity Predicts Eudaimonic Well-Being and Cortisol Output

    Aaron S. Heller;Carien M. van Reekum;Stacey M. Schaefer;Regina C. Lapate

  • Nothing is safe: Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with compromised fear extinction learning.

    Jayne Morriss;Anastasia Christakou;Carien M. van Reekum

  • Chapter 6 Levels of processing in emotion-antecedent appraisal

    Carien M. van Reekum;Klaus R. Scherer

  • Intolerance of uncertainty predicts fear extinction in amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortical circuitry.

    Jayne Morriss;Anastasia Christakou;Carien M. van Reekum

  • Temporal dynamics of emotional responding: amygdala recovery predicts emotional traits

    Brianna S. Schuyler;Tammi R. A. Kral;Jolene Jacquart;Cory A. Burghy

  • The effect of cycling on cognitive function and well-being in older adults.

    Louise-Ann Leyland;Louise-Ann Leyland;Ben Spencer;Nick Beale;Tim Jones

  • Purposeful Engagement, Healthy Aging, and the Brain

    Carol D. Ryff;Aaron S. Heller;Stacey M. Schaefer;Carien van Reekum

  • How reward modulates mimicry: EMG evidence of greater facial mimicry of more rewarding happy faces

    Thomas B. Sims;Carien M. Van Reekum;Tom Johnstone;Bhismadev Chakrabarti;Bhismadev Chakrabarti

  • Affective Speech Elicited With a Computer Game

    Tom Johnstone;Carien M. van Reekum;Kathryn Hird;Kim Kirsner

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Tom Johnstone
Tom Johnstone Swinburne University of Technology
Moo K. Chung
Moo K. Chung University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva
Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Bhismadev Chakrabarti University of Reading
Heather L. Urry
Heather L. Urry Tufts University
Andrew L. Alexander
Andrew L. Alexander University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard J. Harrison
Richard J. Harrison University of Cambridge
Feng Kong
Feng Kong Shaanxi Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology opens the door to a wide array of career options, and choosing the right degree is crucial for your future. If you want to explore which qualifications hold the most promise, check out the most valuable psychology degrees in the US to see where your interests could take you.

Many students also consider social work as a related field due to its emphasis on making a real impact in communities. If you're looking to study from anywhere, explore the best online bachelor's in social work degree programs in America. For California residents or those interested in studying in the state, the top online social work programs in California offer flexible, high-quality options.

If you aim to reach the highest level in social work, there are advanced options available. Earning a doctorate is possible online through the best online social work doctorate degrees in the US. Each of these pathways can prepare you for diverse roles in mental health, counseling, education, and social advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Carien M. van Reekum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles