World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
6885
World Ranking
10076
National Ranking
226

Anna Costanza Baldry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Costanza Baldry sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anna Costanza Baldry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Costanza Baldry sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna Costanza Baldry is affiliated with the University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" in Italy. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with an emphasis on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's work concentrates on several interrelated topics, including:

  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Recent publications highlight their contributions to understanding violence and victimization. These include:

  • The Decision to Leave the Abusive Partner by Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence and Risk of Further Revictimization: The Role of Gratitude and Risk Perception (2020) published in Violence Against Women
  • Femicide Fatal Risk Factors: A Last Decade Comparison between Italian Victims of Femicide by Age Groups (2020) published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Bystanders' reactions to intimate partner violence: an experimental approach (2020) published in European Review of Social Psychology
  • Issues in measuring and comparing the incidence of intimate partner homicide and femicide - A focus on Europe (2020) published in RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA

Frequent coauthors of Baldry include:

  • Vincenza Cinquegrana
  • Anna Sorrentino
  • Chiara Guida
  • Stefano Pagliaro
  • Maria Giuseppina Pacilli

Publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • European Review of Social Psychology
  • Violence Against Women
  • RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA

Best Publications

  • Bullying in schools and exposure to domestic violence

    Anna C Baldry

  • Bullies and delinquents: personal characteristics and parental styles

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington

  • The impact of direct and indirect bullying on the mental and physical health of Italian youngsters

    Anna C. Baldry

  • Protective Factors as Moderators of Risk Factors in Adolescence Bullying

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington

  • Brief report: types of bullying among Italian school children.

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington

  • “Am I at risk of cyberbullying”? A narrative review and conceptual framework for research on risk of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: The risk and needs assessment approach

    Anna Costanza Baldry;David P. Farrington;Anna Sorrentino;Anna Sorrentino

  • Parenting influences on bullying and victimization

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington

  • Evaluation of an intervention program for the reduction of bullying and victimization in schools

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington

  • Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles

    Izabela Zych;Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington;Vicente J. Llorent

  • Effectiveness of Programmes to Reduce School Bullying A Systematic Review

    M Tofi;D Farrington;A Baldry

  • Individual risk factors for school bullying

    David P Farrington;Anna Costanza Baldry

  • Effectiveness of Programs to Prevent School Bullying

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington

  • Animal Abuse and Exposure to Interparental Violence in Italian Youth

    Anna C. Baldry

  • Cyberbullying and cybervictimization versus parental supervision, monitoring and control of adolescents' online activities

    Anna Costanza Baldry;Anna Costanza Baldry;Anna Sorrentino;David P. Farrington

  • School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap

    Anna Costanza Baldry;David P. Farrington;Anna Sorrentino

  • Direct and vicarious victimization at school and at home as risk factors for suicidal cognition among Italian adolescents

    Anna C. Baldry;Frans Willem Winkel

  • ‘What about bullying?’ An experimental field study to understand students' attitudes towards bullying and victimisation in Italian middle schools

    Anna C. Baldry

  • Bullying among Italian Middle School Students: Combining Methods to Understand Aggressive Behaviours and Victimization

    Anna Costanza Baldry

  • Animal abuse among preadolescents directly and indirectly victimized at school and at home.

    Anna C. Baldry

  • Cyberbullying in youth: A pattern of disruptive behaviour

    Anna C. Baldry;David P. Farrington;Anna Sorrentino;Anna Sorrentino;Anna Sorrentino

  • Effectiveness of programmes to reduce school bullying : A systematic review. Report prepared for the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention

    M. Tofi;D. Farrington;A.C. Baldry

Frequent Co-Authors

David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Izabela Zych
Izabela Zych University of Córdoba
Isabel Goicolea
Isabel Goicolea Umeå University
Heidi Stöckl
Heidi Stöckl University of London
Stefan Bogaerts
Stefan Bogaerts Tilburg University
Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh
Aldert Vrij
Aldert Vrij University of Portsmouth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students choose degrees in counseling, mental health, or marriage and family therapy (MFT) to impact their communities and support individuals and families.

Pathways to becoming a therapist can vary by location. For those interested in how to become an mft in Memphis, understanding local licensing requirements, clinical hours, and accredited programs is essential. Similarly, reviewing the Mesa mft education requirements can help guide your academic journey based on area-specific standards.

If you're considering a career in Florida, you may want to learn more about how to become an mft in Miami, as every state has unique steps for licensure and practice. Additionally, Wisconsin offers its own path, and those interested should investigate the mft requirements in Milwaukee to understand eligibility and training options.

Choosing the right online program and confirming your career goals with local requirements ensures a successful, fulfilling journey in psychology and mental health professions.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Costanza Baldry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles