World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bram Vervliet

Bram Vervliet

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3965 3656 54 51 275 18260

Bram Vervliet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bram Vervliet between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bram Vervliet published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2015. 24 of the 300 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2015. 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 6 publications
2001 2025

300 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bram Vervliet: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 5
2002 4
2003 4
2004 6
2005 8
2006 10
2007 15
2008 11
2009 9
2010 13
2011 14
2012 21
2013 17
2014 16
2015 25
2016 16
2017 18
2018 11
2019 13
2020 12
2021 16
2022 3
2023 9
2024 18
2025 6
Total 300
Download as CSV

Bram Vervliet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bram Vervliet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 275
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bram Vervliet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bram Vervliet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bram Vervliet is a researcher affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium, with a focus on neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans several related subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and education.

Their research addresses major topics such as stress responses and cortisol, memory and neural mechanisms, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, mental health research topics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and early childhood education and development.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Bram Vervliet include Lukas Van Oudenhove, Tom Beckers, Dirk Hermans, Laura Luyten, and Michael Treanor.

The venues where Bram Vervliet has published repeatedly include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Gedragstherapie.
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • eLife

Among recent papers, Bram Vervliet is noted as an author of the following works:

  • "Optimizing exposure therapy with an inhibitory retrieval approach and the OptEx Nexus" (2022, Behaviour Research and Therapy)
  • "Understanding clinical fear and anxiety through the lens of human fear conditioning" (2023, Nature Reviews Psychology)
  • "Aversive Stimulus Pairings Are an Unnecessary and Insufficient Cause of Pathological Anxiety" (2020, Biological Psychiatry)
  • "Using electrodermal activity to estimate fear learning differences in anxiety: A multiverse analysis" (2024, Behaviour Research and Therapy)
  • "More engagement in inefficient avoidance through partial reinforcement" (2022, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry)

Their research involves investigating the mechanisms underlying fear, anxiety, and avoidance behaviors, often applying methodologies from cognitive and behavioral neuroscience to clinical psychology contexts.

Best Publications

  • The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota-gut-brain communication.

    Boushra Dalile;Lukas Van Oudenhove;Bram Vervliet;Kristin Verbeke

  • Maximizing Exposure Therapy: An Inhibitory Learning Approach

    Michelle G. Craske;Michael Treanor;Christopher C. Conway;Tomislav Zbozinek

  • Beyond extinction: erasing human fear responses and preventing the return of fear

    Merel Kindt;Marieke Soeter;Bram Vervliet

  • Don't fear 'fear conditioning': Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear

    Tina B. Lonsdorf;Mareike M. Menz;Marta Andreatta;Miguel A. Fullana

  • Fear Extinction and Relapse: State of the Art

    Bram Vervliet;Michelle G. Craske;Dirk Hermans

  • Neural signatures of human fear conditioning: an updated and extended meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

    M. A Fullana;B. J Harrison;C Soriano-Mas;C Soriano-Mas;Bram Vervliet

  • Fear Generalization in Humans: Systematic Review and Implications for Anxiety Disorder Research

    Simon Dymond;Joseph E. Dunsmoor;Bram Vervliet;Bryan Roche

  • State-of-the-art and future directions for extinction as a translational model for fear and anxiety

    Michelle G. Craske;Dirk Hermans;Bram Vervliet

  • Fear extinction in the human brain: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies in healthy participants.

    Miquel A. Fullana;Anton Albajes-Eizagirre;Carles Soriano-Mas;Bram Vervliet

  • Role of Inhibition in Exposure Therapy

    Michelle G. Craske;Betty Liao;Lily Brown;Bram Vervliet

  • Dissociable Roles for the Hippocampus and the Amygdala in Human Cued versus Context Fear Conditioning

    Andreas Marschner;Raffael Kalisch;Bram Vervliet;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a return to the original acquistion context.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Dirk Hermans;Bram Vervliet;Geert Francken

  • The repeated confrontation with videotapes of spiders in multiple contexts attenuates renewal of fear in spider-anxious students.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Bram Vervliet;Carlos Iberico;Frank Baeyens

  • Conditioned fear extinction and reinstatement in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

    Seth D. Norrholm;Tanja Jovanovic;Bram Vervliet;Karyn M. Myers

  • Extinction, generalization, and return of fear: a critical review of renewal research in humans.

    Bram Vervliet;Frank Baeyens;Omer Van den Bergh;Dirk Hermans

  • Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions

    Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Daniel David;Daniel David;Tom Beckers;Peter Muris

  • Generalization versus Contextualization in Automatic Evaluation.

    Bertram Gawronski;Robert J. Rydell;Bram Vervliet;Jan De Houwer

  • Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a stimulus change after extinction.

    Bram Vervliet;Debora Vansteenwegen;Frank Baeyens;Dirk Hermans

  • Maximizing exposure therapy An inhibitory learning approach

    Andre Pittig;Stephan Stevens;Bram Vervliet;Michael Treanor

  • Resistance to extinction in evaluative conditioning.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Geert Francken;Bram Vervliet;Armand De Clercq

  • Delinquency and Learning Disabilities

    Annemaree Carroll;Stephen Houghton

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Tom Beckers
Tom Beckers KU Leuven
Frank Baeyens
Frank Baeyens KU Leuven
Paul Eelen
Paul Eelen KU Leuven
Koen Schruers
Koen Schruers Maastricht University
Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles
Filip Raes
Filip Raes KU Leuven
Ann Meulders
Ann Meulders Maastricht University
Miquel A. Fullana
Miquel A. Fullana Clínic Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open the door to various meaningful careers, including specialized roles like substance abuse counseling. Many students are now considering online psychology degrees for their flexibility and wide range of accredited options. These online programs often cover essential topics in mental health, addiction, and counseling skills—paving the way for professional certification.

Each state and city may have unique requirements for entering the field. For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Richmond, you’ll need to follow specific guidelines, including gaining supervised experience. Similarly, reviewing the Riverside substance abuse counselor certification requirements can help you understand local credentials necessary for employment in California.

Educational prerequisites also vary by region. Those considering work in Northern California should look into the Sacramento substance abuse counselors education requirements. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals in the Midwest can learn more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Saint Paul to ensure they meet Minnesota’s standards.

Whether you’re at the start of your journey or advancing your credentials, exploring these resources can better prepare you for a successful psychology career in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Bram Vervliet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles