World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Debora Vansteenwegen

Debora Vansteenwegen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6665
World Ranking
7931
National Ranking
114

Debora Vansteenwegen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Debora Vansteenwegen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Debora Vansteenwegen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Debora Vansteenwegen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Debora Vansteenwegen is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their academic work centers around research activities connected with this institution.

Although there is no specific information on recent papers, publication venues, or co-authors available, Debora Vansteenwegen's contributions have been associated with KU Leuven, a research-intensive university that supports a broad spectrum of academic disciplines.

No details are present regarding particular fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work, nor are there records of book publications or awards won to further outline their research focus.

The available information does not list any recent scholarly papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues related to Debora Vansteenwegen's work. Therefore, the overview of their academic contributions remains centered on their institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Affect 4.0: A free software package for implementing psychological and psychophysiological experiments

    Adriaan Spruyt;Jeroen Clarysse;Debora Vansteenwegen;Frank Baeyens

  • Fear and learning : from basic processes to clinical implications

    Michelle Genevieve Craske;Dirk Hermans;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Reinstatement of fear responses in human aversive conditioning

    Dirk Hermans;Trinette Dirikx;Debora Vansteenwegenin;Frank Baeyens

  • Eye Movement Registration as a Continuous Index of Attention Deployment: Data from a Group of Spider Anxious Students

    Dirk Hermans;Debora Vansteenwegen;Paul Eelen

  • Inhalation/Exhalation Ratio Modulates the Effect of Slow Breathing on Heart Rate Variability and Relaxation

    Ilse Van Diest;Karen Verstappen;André E. Aubert;Devy Widjaja;Devy Widjaja

  • Dissociable Roles for the Hippocampus and the Amygdala in Human Cued versus Context Fear Conditioning

    Andreas Marschner;Raffael Kalisch;Bram Vervliet;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Rating data are underrated: validity of US expectancy in human fear conditioning.

    Yannick Boddez;Frank Baeyens;Laura Luyten;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a return to the original acquistion context.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Dirk Hermans;Bram Vervliet;Geert Francken

  • Expectancy-learning and evaluative learning in human classical conditioning: affective priming as an indirect and unobtrusive measure of conditioned stimulus valence.

    Dirk Hermans;Debora Vansteenwegen;Geert Crombez;Frank Baeyens

  • The acquisition of fear of movement-related pain and associative learning: a novel pain-relevant human fear conditioning paradigm

    Ann Meulders;Debora Vansteenwegen;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen

  • The repeated confrontation with videotapes of spiders in multiple contexts attenuates renewal of fear in spider-anxious students.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Bram Vervliet;Carlos Iberico;Frank Baeyens

  • Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a stimulus change after extinction.

    Bram Vervliet;Debora Vansteenwegen;Frank Baeyens;Dirk Hermans

  • Feeling we're biased: autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict.

    Wim De Neys;Elke Moyens;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Resistance to extinction in evaluative conditioning.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Geert Francken;Bram Vervliet;Armand De Clercq

  • Reinstatement of extinguished conditioned responses and negative stimulus valence as a pathway to return of fear in humans.

    Trinette Dirikx;Dirk Hermans;Debora Vansteenwegen;Frank Baeyens

  • Understanding fear of pain in chronic pain: interoceptive fear conditioning as a novel approach.

    Steven De Peuter;Ilse Van Diest;Debora Vansteenwegen;Omer Van den Bergh

  • Exposure to physical movements in low back pain patients: restricted effects of generalization.

    Geert Crombez;Chris Eccleston;Johan W. S. Vlaeyen;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Counterconditioning reduces cue-induced craving and actual cue-elicited consumption.

    Dinska Van Gucht;Frank Baeyens;Debora Vansteenwegen;Dirk Hermans

  • Exposure to physical movement in chronic back pain patients: no evidence for generalization across different movements

    Liesbet Goubert;Geert Francken;Geert Crombez;Debora Vansteenwegen

  • Stronger renewal in human fear conditioning when tested with an acquisition retrieval cue than with an extinction retrieval cue.

    Debora Vansteenwegen;Bram Vervliet;Dirk Hermans;Tom Beckers

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Hermans
Dirk Hermans KU Leuven
Frank Baeyens
Frank Baeyens KU Leuven
Bram Vervliet
Bram Vervliet KU Leuven
Paul Eelen
Paul Eelen KU Leuven
Tom Beckers
Tom Beckers KU Leuven
Ann Meulders
Ann Meulders Maastricht University
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Rudi D'Hooge
Rudi D'Hooge KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Counseling is one of the most popular fields for psychology graduates, leading to roles in schools, healthcare, and private practice. Students can earn a degree online from institutions across the country, making it convenient to balance work and study.

When considering your options, it’s wise to look at regional program strengths. For example, the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Arizona are well-regarded for their emphasis on multicultural counseling. In California, the top-ranked counseling degree programs in California provide robust courses in clinical and community counseling. If you’re seeking urban experience, the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Chicago offer strong ties to local healthcare and school systems. The most popular counseling degree programs in Colorado emphasize mental health advocacy and research.

No matter the location, online psychology and counseling degrees can prepare graduates for diverse careers. Paths may include clinical counseling, research, social work, or organizational consulting, each contributing to the mental well-being of individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Debora Vansteenwegen

Recently Published Articles