World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hartmut Schächinger

Hartmut Schächinger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5941 5524 281 276 233 9111

Hartmut Schächinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hartmut Schächinger between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hartmut Schächinger published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2009. 3 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2009. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1987 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hartmut Schächinger: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 4
1991 7
1992 8
1993 4
1994 3
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 0
1999 3
2000 5
2001 2
2002 2
2003 8
2004 6
2005 5
2006 5
2007 9
2008 21
2009 32
2010 23
2011 19
2012 8
2013 18
2014 13
2015 10
2016 14
2017 8
2018 7
2019 7
2020 8
2021 1
2022 3
2023 5
2024 2
2025 1
Total 284
Download as CSV

Hartmut Schächinger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartmut Schächinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 233 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 233
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hartmut Schächinger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartmut Schächinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hartmut Schächinger is affiliated with the University of Trier in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on interdisciplinary areas bridging medicine, neuroscience, and psychology, with a strong emphasis on behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, cardiology, and experimental psychology.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including stress responses and cortisol, heart rate variability and autonomic control, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, hormonal regulation and hypertension, neural and behavioral psychology studies, anxiety, depression and related psychometrics, as well as EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Recent publications by Hartmut Schächinger include the following:

  • "Cardiac cycle phases affect auditory-evoked potentials, startle eye blink and pre-motor reaction times in response to acoustic startle stimuli," 2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • "Disentangling sensorimotor and cognitive cardioafferent effects: A cardiac-cycle-time study on spatial stimulus-response compatibility," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Effects of rejection intensity and rejection sensitivity on social approach behavior in women," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Combining mental and physical stress: Synergy or interference?," 2021, Physiology & Behavior
  • "Modulation of startle and heart rate responses by fear of physical activity in patients with heart failure and in healthy adults," 2020, Physiology & Behavior

The scientist has frequently published in several academic venues. The most notable among these include:

  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Physiology & Behavior
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE

Hartmut Schächinger collaborates regularly with several co-authors in their research. The most frequent collaborators include:

  • Johannes B. Finke
  • André Schulz
  • Claus Vögele
  • Mauro F. Larra
  • Jeremia Mark Hoffmann

In terms of research fields, the scientist is active in:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

The subfields within these areas that form the focus of their research include:

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Best Publications

  • HPA axis activation by a socially evaluated cold-pressor test.

    Lars Schwabe;Leila Haddad;Hartmut Schachinger

  • Post-learning intranasal oxytocin modulates human memory for facial identity.

    Egemen Savaskan;Rike Ehrhardt;André Schulz;Marc Walter

  • Stress modulates the use of spatial versus stimulus-response learning strategies in humans.

    Lars Schwabe;Melly S. Oitzl;Christine Philippsen;Steffen Richter

  • The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress - can u shape it?

    Corinna Peifer;André Schulz;André Schulz;Hartmut Schächinger;Nicola Baumann

  • Effect of water deprivation on cognitive-motor performance in healthy men and women

    Gabor Szinnai;Hartmut Schachinger;Maurice J Arnaud;Lilly Linder

  • Reduced parasympathetic cardiac control in patients with hypertension at rest and under mental stress.

    Wolf Langewitz;Heinz Rüddel;Hartmut Schächinger

  • Effects of pre-learning stress on memory for neutral, positive and negative words: Different roles of cortisol and autonomic arousal.

    Lars Schwabe;Andreas Bohringer;Monischa Chatterjee;Hartmut Schachinger

  • Corticosteroids operate as a switch between memory systems

    Lars Schwabe;Hartmut Schächinger;E. Ron de Kloet;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Relevance of stress and female sex hormones for emotion and cognition.

    J. P. ter Horst;E. R. de Kloet;H. Schächinger;M. S. Oitzl

  • Chronic stress modulates the use of spatial and stimulus-response learning strategies in mice and man.

    Lars Schwabe;Sergiu Dalm;Hartmut Schächinger;Melly S. Oitzl

  • Rising Sound Intensity: An Intrinsic Warning Cue Activating the Amygdala

    Dominik R. Bach;Hartmut Schächinger;John G. Neuhoff;Fabrizio Esposito

  • Stability of heart rate variability indices reflecting parasympathetic activity.

    Katja Bertsch;Katja Bertsch;Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Hartmut Schächinger

  • Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain

    Erich Seifritz;John G. Neuhoff;Deniz Bilecen;Klaus Scheffler

  • Cardiovascular indices of peripheral and central sympathetic activation.

    Hartmut Schächinger;Markus Weinbacher;Alexander Kiss;Rudolf Ritz

  • Disordered calcium homeostasis of sepsis: association with calcitonin precursors

    B Müller;K L Becker;M Kränzlin;H Schächinger

  • Making sense of what you sense: Disentangling interoceptive awareness, sensibility and accuracy

    Thomas Forkmann;Anne Scherer;Judith Meessen;Matthias Michal

  • For whom the bell (curve) tolls: Cortisol rapidly affects memory retrieval by an inverted U-shaped dose–response relationship

    Thomas M. Schilling;Monika Kölsch;Mauro F. Larra;Carina M. Zech

  • Ten years of research with the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test: Data from the past and guidelines for the future.

    Lars Schwabe;Hartmut Schächinger

  • Cold pressor stress induces opposite effects on cardioceptive accuracy dependent on assessment paradigm.

    André Schulz;Johanna Lass-Hennemann;Johanna Lass-Hennemann;Stefan Sütterlin;Hartmut Schächinger

  • Testing the cumulative stress and mismatch hypotheses of psychopathology in a rat model of early-life adversity.

    Nikolaos P. Daskalakis;Melly S. Oitzl;Hartmut Schächinger;Danielle L. Champagne

Frequent Co-Authors

Terry D. Blumenthal
Terry D. Blumenthal Wake Forest University
Claus Vögele
Claus Vögele University of Luxembourg
Melly S. Oitzl
Melly S. Oitzl University of Amsterdam
Lars Schwabe
Lars Schwabe Universität Hamburg
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Christian Frings
Christian Frings University of Trier
Daniel J. Cox
Daniel J. Cox University of Virginia
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Claude P. Muller
Claude P. Muller University of Trier
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of career opportunities, many of which require further specialization and licensure. One popular career path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which offers the opportunity to work directly with individuals, couples, and families.

The process to become an MFT can vary depending on location. For insights about how to become an mft in Jersey City, requirements typically include earning a graduate degree, completing supervised hours, and passing exams. If you are interested in the Midwest, the steps for how to become an mft in Kansas City offer a similar path with specific state credentials.

Prospective professionals in Texas can review the Laredo mft education requirements which emphasize relevant coursework and clinical training. Meanwhile, those aiming for Nevada should explore the Las Vegas mft certification requirements to ensure eligibility.

Exploring these pathways can help you align your psychology degree with a rewarding career in mental health. Online degrees offer the flexibility to meet education and training requirements from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Hartmut Schächinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles